Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flamelet model limitations

A 2-D CFD model has been set up using FLUENT4.5 in a joint EU JOULE project with FLUENT and ALSTOM. As turbulence models the k- model and Reynolds Stress model (RSM) have been applied. As chemistry models a chemical equilibrium model has been applied and on the other hand two models describing finite reaction chemistry, i.e. the laminar flamelet model and the reaction progress variable model. The comparison between experiments and the numerical results from the three chemistry models show that the chemical equilibrium model is sufficient to predict the combustion of LCV gas at elevated pressures, since deviation from chemical equilibrium is small due to the fast reactions. Hence no improvements are expected and have been observed from kinetically limited models. The RSM with constants Cl and C2 in the pressure-strain term proposed by Gibson and Younis [17] seems to yield the best predictions, however, the influence of the type of turbulence model (RSM or k- e) on the species concentrations and temperature predictions is not very large. [Pg.485]

Figure 5.1. Closures for the chemical source term can be understood in terms of their relationship to the joint composition PDF. The simplest methods attempt to represent the joint PDF by its (lower-order) moments. At the next level, the joint PDF is expressed in terms of the product of the conditional joint PDF and the mixture-fraction PDF. The conditional joint PDF can then be approximated by invoking the fast-chemistry or flamelet limits, by modeling the conditional means of the compositions, or by assuming a functional form for the PDF. Similarly, it is also possible to assume a functional form for the joint composition PDF. The best method to employ depends strongly on the functional form of the chemical source term and its characteristic time scales. Figure 5.1. Closures for the chemical source term can be understood in terms of their relationship to the joint composition PDF. The simplest methods attempt to represent the joint PDF by its (lower-order) moments. At the next level, the joint PDF is expressed in terms of the product of the conditional joint PDF and the mixture-fraction PDF. The conditional joint PDF can then be approximated by invoking the fast-chemistry or flamelet limits, by modeling the conditional means of the compositions, or by assuming a functional form for the PDF. Similarly, it is also possible to assume a functional form for the joint composition PDF. The best method to employ depends strongly on the functional form of the chemical source term and its characteristic time scales.
In region HI, bounded by the lines corresponding to Kax = 1 at the bottom and Dax = 1 at the top, the reaction zone thickness grows and the flame cannot be described by the flamelet approach based on the laminar curved flame model. As a limiting case the ideal mixing reactor model (the chemical reaction speed is neglected in comparison with the turbulent mixing time) is considered. [Pg.9]


See other pages where Flamelet model limitations is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.755]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.437]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.206 , Pg.207 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.206 , Pg.207 ]




SEARCH



Flamelet model

Flamelets

Model limitations

Modeling limitations

© 2024 chempedia.info