Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Finding New Elements

And so with Moseley s work break, it would seem that we have come full cycle. We have now seen a rationalization of the order of the elements in the Periodic Table and an explanation for atomic weights. But finding new elements is not all there is to inorganic chemistry. Each one of these elements once identified has a chemistry and... [Pg.274]

In Sweden the eagerness to find new elements had not been reduced. A. E. [Pg.1133]

Another possible side effect of the acceptance of the periodic system was that the search for new elements became more focused, since the periodic system set a limit to the amount of elements that could be discovered. A marked dechne of reports on new elements can be seen toward the end of the century. None of the earlier systems, including Blomstrand s, had given such a hmit to the number of new elements. This no-limit attitude partly explains the many earlier reports of new elements, which later turned out not to be elements. Among some chemists spectral analysis at first also seemed to have contributed to an increased behef in the possibility of finding new elements. Nilson and Krilss referred to this method when they, admittedly according to a rather late source, declared that it was in principle possible to find more than twenty new elements, using spectral analysis. ... [Pg.164]

Maher draws attention to the 1874 paper of Lecoq de Boisbaudran in which he announced the discovery of gallium, the first of Mendeleev s predictions to be confirmed. And this is, indeed, an important paper. One possible misconception should, however, be quashed immediately. De Boisbaudran did not discover gallium as a result of testing Mendeleev s prediction. Instead he operated quite independently by empirical means in ignorance of Mendeleev s prediction and he proceeded to characterise the new element spectroscopically. De Boisbaudran s findings were published in the Comptes Rendus. [Pg.55]

Mendeleev is often given most credit lor his fame as the "father of the periodic table" because he predicted elements that wars undiscovered at the time. But Just how impressive were those predictions As for as the elements grfllum, germanium and scandium are concerned, they were quite outstanding—so much so that Mendeleev was evan able to correct some of the initial experimental findings on these new elements. [Pg.126]

The discovery of two new elements started a frenetic race to find more. Actinium was soon unearthed (Debierne 1900) and many other substances were isolated from U and Th which also seemed to be new elements. One of these was discovered somewhat fortuitously. Several workers had noticed that the radioactivity of Th salts seemed to vary randomly with time and they noticed that the variation correlated with drafts in the lab, appearing to reflect a radioactive emanation which could be blown away from the surface of the Th. This Th-emanation was not attracted by charge and appeared to be a gas, °Rn, as it turns out, although Rutherford at first speculated that it was Th vapor. Rutherford swept some of the Th-emanation into a jar and repeatedly measured its ability to ionize air in order to assess its radioactivity. He was therefore the first to report an exponential decrease in radioactivity with time, and his 1900 paper on the subject introduced the familiar equation dN/dt = - iN, as well as the concept of half-lives (Rutherford 1900a). His measured half-life for the Th emanation of 60 seconds was remarkably close to our present assessment of 55.6 seconds for °Rn. [Pg.663]

The first moon explorers brought back rock samples of a nature never before seen on earth, but they did not find any new elements. The moon rocks merely added to the proof that the moon, the earth, and the whole universe are made from the same elemental building blocks. [Pg.83]

Where might one find new AC/QC materials Our earlier extensions of the p-element components in Zintl-type compounds to the triels (Al, Ga, In, Tl) (beyond the so-called Zintl boundary ) as well as the inclusions of late transition metals had already given us some significant glimpses of new and appropriate chemistry and structures [46,51]. In addition, some examples were already in the literature for Ga [44], In contrast, the anion or intermetallic chemistry of aluminum [45] stands apart from that of the three heavier group members (Ga, In, and Tl) and will not be considered here significantly. [Pg.21]

As is often the case when working out an interaction, we find we have brought new elements into the design. These elements should now be incorporated into the class diagram... [Pg.283]

Chemists used spectral analysis during the nineteenth century to analyze substances and, sometimes, to discover new elements. Another common technique for analyzing substances, often used in conjunction with spectral analysis is a flame test. One of the foremost practitioners of this technique was a chemist named Robert Bunsen. Find out why he invented his famous burner. Carry on your research to investigate other ways that chemists use spectral analysis to examine the composition of substances. Select an appropriate medium to report your findings. [Pg.122]

There is a long and mixed history for the claims of discovery for ruthenium. In 1748 Antonio de UUoa (1716—1795), a Spanish scientist and explorer, reported finding a special metal in South America. It was silvery-gray and denser than gold, but it did not have the attractive luster of gold or silver. He did know that he had located a new element along with the platinum metal. [Pg.134]

It is interesting to notice the form in which the mixed products of l-RDM and l-HRDM elements carry global information about the correlation effects. In our opinion (24) and (25) are important Sum relations. Unfortunately they are not independent relations since by adding up relation (25) for a given element to the relation obtained for the cross element one obtains relation (24). Therefore we have only half of the conditions needed for solving the global problem which thus remains open. The question is whether there is still possible to find new relations or whether we must think of an approximative approach which would complete the information needed. [Pg.49]

Lecoq, incidentaiiy, did not know of Mendeieyev s tabie or his predictions when he discovered gaiiium, and he was rather put out to find that his discovery had aiready been anticipated. He argued that the density of the new element was actually quite different from that which Mendeleyev had predicted for eka-aiuminium, so it could not possibly be the substance the Russian had foreseen. But a subsequent measurement showed that Mendeleyev s predicted density was spot on. [Pg.85]

ATOMIC ENERGY — The force hidden in the atom will be turned into light and heat and power for everyday uses. Chemists of the future, working with their brother-scientists, the physicists, will find new ways of harnessing and using the atoms of numerous elements — some of them unknown to the scientists of today. [Pg.109]

The most effective way to find the matrix elements of the operators of physical quantities for many-electron configurations is the method of CFP. Their numerical values are generally tabulated. The methods of second-quantization and quasispin yield algebraic expressions for CFP, and hence for the matrix elements of the operators assigned to the physical quantities. These methods make it possible to establish the relationship between CFP and the submatrix elements of irreducible tensorial operators, and also to find new recurrence relations for each of the above-mentioned characteristics with respect to the seniority quantum number. The application of the Wigner-Eckart theorem in quasispin space enables new recurrence relations to be obtained for various quantities of the theory relative to the number of electrons in the configuration. [Pg.111]

Whenever a new compound is made in the laboratory or found in nature, it must be analyzed to find what elements it contains and how much of each element is present—that is, to find its composition. The percent composition of a compound is expressed by identifying the elements present and giving the mass percent of each. For example, we might express the percent composition of a certain colorless liquid found in gasoline by saying that it contains 84.1% carbon and 15.9% hydrogen by mass. In other words, a 100.0 g sample of the compound contains 84.1 g of carbon atoms and 15.9 g of hydrogen atoms. [Pg.97]


See other pages where Finding New Elements is mentioned: [Pg.322]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.745]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.745]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.193]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info