Fiducial limits

The estimated potency is not less than 80% and not more than 125% of the stated potency. The fiducial limits of error of the estimated potency p = 0.95) are not less than 64% and not more than 156% of the stated potency. 

The factor for heterogeneity for each line was used in the determination of the fiducial limits of the LD values selected on that line. More than 1300 separate lots of treated fruit were used in these tests and mortality counts of approximately 250,000 insects were involved. 

In mixture with kerosene, the LDjs value for paraffinic fraction 5 was found to be 63 micrograms per sq. cm., with fiducial limits of —10 and +11 micrograms at a probability of 0.05 and the LDss value for fraction 9 was foimd to be 67 micrograms per sq. cm , wilii fiducial limits of —10 and +12 micrograms at a probability of 0.05. Further studies of this nature are in progress. 

Nevertheless, limitations imposed by the fiducial limits of the force constants will apply irrespective of the method by which the coupling constants themselves have been derived, and the great advantage of the Angular Overlap Model is that it enables good estimates of Ejt to be deduced very simply and without the complexity of previous and more convoluted methods of calculating the coupling constants. (See for example Van... 

Although the LD 0 can be obtained from a log dosage-probit line by graphic estimation, bioassay data need to be subjected to probit analysis to obtain a more reliable value. This analysis will provide, in addition to the LD50, parameters such as the X2 value (for testing the heterogeneity of discrepancies between observed and expected numbers), 95% fiducial limits to the... 

Because the chi-square is small (P > 0.1000), fiducial limits will be calculated using a t value of 1.96. 

Strictly speaking, these are fiducial limits and not confidence limits. For practical purposes the distinction is so slight as to be not worth making, and because of its greater intelligibility the term confidence limit is used here. 

Data set (True LD50) Normality with Respect to Calculation Method with Estimate (95% Fiducial Limits) ... 

Pyre th mid UK, (mg per insect) 95% Fiducial limits Factor of synergism... 

Precision. Figures for the index of precision (A) using such techniques do not yet appear to have been calculated. According to Stockell and Hartree (S25), the precision of hemagglutination-inhibition tests is reasonably satisfactory in skilled hands, the fiducial limits of... 

This has been defined (B5) as the smallest single result which, with some assurance, can be distinguished from zero, or, in statistical terms, the smallest single result whose fiducial limits for, say, P = 0.05 do not include zero. This review will be primarily concerned with clinical chemical methods that have acceptable levels of sensitivity, and to which therefore statistical methods of quality control can be applied throughout the range of concentrations which may be encountered in physiological and pathological conditions. To take an extreme example, therefore, the statistical methods of quality control discussed in this review would not be fully applicable to determinations of plasma epinephrine or... 

Fig. 5. Classical linear regression plot. R is the regression line for a calibration curve o and b, the true 1% fiducial limits for future estimates of y. The bars show the probable standard deviations of measurements of y aX x = A, B, and C. e, d = the probable form of the actual 1% fiducial limits of a calibration curve in analytical chemistry when working near the limits of sensitivity.

LD50 (mg kg Fiducial limits ) 95% DRF FD50 (mg kg-1) Fiducial limits 95% DRF FD50 (mgk-1) Fiducial limits 95% DRF... 

ChEI Improving dose mg/kg, p.o. LD50 (95% fiducial limits) mg/kg, p.o... 

Confidence limits are an idea due to Neyman. (Fisher used a similar, but conceptually more difficult and controversial, idea of fiducial limits.) Neyman s idea can be explained like this. Conventionally, when testing the effects of treatment, we use the null hypothesis that they are equal and that the difference between them is zero. The framework of hypothesis testing, however, allows us to use any difference at all as a null hypothesis. Suppose in a given case we test a number of such null hypotheses at (say) the 5% level. For example, we might test the null hypothesis that the difference is 5 mm and then the null hypothesis that it is —7 mm and so forth. If we do this, we shall reject some of these null hypotheses and not reject others. We can then collect all the null hypotheses that we would not reject in one set. Usually these will form one continuous interval and the limits of this interval can be established mathematically. The interval so derived then constitutes a confidence interval (in this case a 95% confidence interval) and the limits of the interval are confidence limits (in this case 95% limits). Values of the treatment effect lying outside the limits are then regarded as unreasonable values to entertain. 

In a related study, Kauffman and Kennedy (65) demonstrated that the toxicity of PI 134417 and BC2 foliage to sonorensis larvae during cocoon spinning was eliminated when the glandular trichomes were removed. They further demonstrated the acute toxicity of 2-tridecanone and 2-undecanone to sonorensis larvae on treated filter paper disks (2-tridecanone LC50 = 13.0, 95% fiducial limits =... 

It has been suggested by Wood (53) that, for those microbiological assays which show a strictly linear portion to the standard curve, the so-called slope-ratio method diould be used for calculating the results. This method, of course, has the merit of being statistically sound, and it also has the valuable advantage that it is possible to calculate the fiducial limits of an assay. 

Table 1. Changes in plasma ACTH concentrations 10 minutes after the intraperitoneal injection of various substances in saline-, phentolamine-, or MJ-1999 treated rats. Doses are expressed as Lg free base per rat. B.P. blood pressure. Pooled samples from 10 rats were assayed in 5 to 20 assay animals. (Fiducial limits at P = 0.95 are given in parentheses.)... 

The potency is calculated by equating the average lethal doses for the standard and the sample being tested, and its fiducial limits are calculated by standard statistical methods (see p. 841). The potency of digitalis is considered satisfactory if the estimate lies between 8-5 and 11 5 units per g providing that the fiducial limits (P = 0 95) of the estimate is not less than 8 nor greater than 12 units per g. 

The use of this estimate of variance to assign fiducial limits of error to a ratio will overestimate the precision of an assay unless the coefficient of variation of b is small. Fieller showed that the true fiducial limits are the roots of the quadratic. 

---