FE-SEM images

Fig. 2. (a) (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of as-grown VGCFs (broken portion) with the PCNT core exposed field emission-type scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) image of (c) as-grown and (d) heat-treated VGCFs (broken portion) at 2800°C with PCNT (white line) exposed [20],... 

Fig. 16. Representative FE-SEM images of the branched Pf-BuA-silica hybrid nanoparticles obtained by SCVCP of f-BuA with the inimer 1 at y=6.1 (a, b) and y=l.l(c, d). (Reproduced with permission from [134], Copyright 2001 American Chemical Society.)...

Figure 8.1 FE-SEM images of K-OMS-2 [(a)-(c)], y-Mn02 [(d) and (e)], and Rb-OMS-2 [(f) and (g)] nanomaterials synthesized using the hydrothermal method. Reprinted with permission from [9-11] (2011) American Chemical Society and Wiley-VCH GmbH Co. KGaA.

HRSEM images of STA-7 were taken using a JEOL JSM-7000F (FE SEM). Images of silicalite-2 and zeolite A were taken on a JEOL JSM-7401F (cold-FE SEM) using the Everhart-Thomley (E-T) secondary electron detector. Samples were not coated but placed on a conductive surface. 

Fig. 5.21 FE-SEM images of titanium foil sample anodized in DSMO and ethanol mixture solution (1 1) containing 4% HE at -h20 V (vs. Pt) for 70 h at room temperature (a) before and (b) after washing in dilute HE.

Figure 10 FE-SEM images of polyp5rrole/C104 nanotubes obtained by electropolymerization in the pores of supported nanoporous template with thickness of 350 nm (a, b, c) and 1.3 pm (d).

Fig. 11. (a) FE-SEM image of FHETMS/Si- OH patterned monolayer and (b) ESEM image of a water droplet on an FHETMS/Si-OH patterned monolayer after exposure in water vapor at 273 K. 

Fig. 32 (a) TEM image of TiO, nanotubes (Reproduced with permission from ref. 29) (b) and (c) FE-SEM images of TiOj nanoiubes deposited from a TiF4 solution. (Reproduced with permission from ref. 80). 

Recipe from [2127-2129], Ultrasonically Aided Submerged Arc Properties Anatase with admixture of rutile, TEM and FE-SEM images, XRD pattern available [2130]. 

Fig. 15.18 FE-SEM images of electroless NiB film deposited on (a) the organic substrate, (b) the inorganic substrate...

Fig. 2 shows the FE-SEM images of Na2Ca4Mg2Si4Oi5 4 mol % Tb3+particles. The particles showed a narrow size-distribution of about 80 100 nm with spherical shape. There was only minor aggregation of the particles. 

Figure 1. FE-SEM images of (a) uncoated and (b) coated H-ZSM-5 crystals synthesized from the solutions with the TPAOH/SiOa molar ratios of (b) jc= 0.0, (c) x= 0.12, (d) x= 0.24 in the precursor solutions. Scale bar 1.5 pm.

Fig. 3 shows a FE-SEM image of the Pt/C sample. White dots correspond to Pt particles. The particle sizes are about 3-8 nm and the Pt nanoparticles were... 

Fig. 1 FE-SEM images of fractured surfaces of (a) PEG, (b) PEG loaded with paracetamol and montmorillonite, PEGP5M1, (c) PEGP5M1 and (d)PEG loaded with paracetamol and fluoromica,...

Figure 38.3 shows field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of Ni/NiO nanoparticles prepared at different pressures and carrier gas flow rates. It was found that the particle size generally increased as the residence time increased. With an identical residence time, 40 Torr, there was a total carrier gas flow rate of 1 L/min, while at 80 Torr the total carrier gas flow rate was 2 L/min. However, particles formed in the latter case were bigger. Carrier gas flow rate also played a role in controlling particle size, as shown by the difference in particle size at the same pressure but with a different carrier gas flow rate. The effect of pressure played a more important role than the residence time (Fig. 38.3a, d). 

Fig. 39.2 FE-SEM images of Y203 Eu powder prepared using two different atomizers, (a) two-fluid nozzle, (b) ultrasonic nebulizer. The powder was fabricated at under gaseous flow rates of CH4 2.5 L/min and O2 6.3 L/min. In the case of the two-fluid nozzle atomizer, the dispersant gas (N2) flow rate was 5 L/min (a). When an ultrasonic nebulizer was used, the nitrogen (carrier gas) flow rate was 7 L/min (b). ([4] Reproduced by permission of The Society of Chemical Engineer-Japan)...

Fig. 39.3 FE-SEM images of Y3Al50i2 Ce + (YAG Ce +) powder prepared from different precursor concentrations of 0.05 M (a) and 0.3 M (b). (c) Average particle size as a function of precursor concentration. The powder was fabricated under gaseous flow rates of CH4 5.5 L/min, O2 13.8 L/min, N2 (carrier gas) 2 L/min. The as-prepared powder was then annealed at 1100°C for 2 h to convert fiorn a hexagonal structure to a garnet structure. ([5] Reproduced by permission of The Electrochemical Society)...

Fig. 39.4 FE-SEM images of hexagonal YAIO3 (YAH, intermediate phase of YAG) indicating nanoparticle dispersion evolution as a function of urea-nitrate ratios of (a) 0, (b) 10, (c) 20, and (d) 30. ([9] Reproduced by permission of Elsevier)...

Fig. 39.7 FE-SEM images of silica particles under flame treatment at different methane flow rates, (a) Monodispersed silica as a precursor, (b) flame-treated at CH4 1 L/min, (c) 2 L/min, and (d) 3 L/min. ([28] Reproduced by permission of John Wiley Sons)...

Fig. 6.2. FE-SEM image of integrally skinned asymmetric polysulfone membrane dried under T2E (ethanol). Reprinted from [2], Copyright 1999, with kind permission from the American Chemical Society...

Figure 12.15 (a) Schematic diagram of a homogeneous coating of well-dispersed SWCNTs on sUicon electrode due to the random adsorption of PANl molecules onto SWCNTs and (b) FE-SEM image of the PANI/SWCNTs composite materials. Reproduced with permission from Ref [69], Copyright 2012 The Polymer Society of Korea and Springer Netherlands. 

Transport and Adsorption Phenomena in Mesopores, Fig. 3 (a) FE-SEM image of an SBA-16 film synthesized on the top surface of a Si substrate, (b) FE-TEM image of the cross section of the film, and (c) schematic of ionic current measurement. Scale bar in FE-SEM and FE-TEM images is 50 nm... 

---