Factor selection mixture-related factors

The selected factors are either mixture-related, quantitative (continuous), or qualitative (discrete).A mixture-related factor is, for instance, the fraction organic solvent in the buffer system. Examples of quantitative factors are the electrolyte concentration, the buffer pH, the capillary temperature, and the voltage, and of qualitative factors the manufacturer or the batch number of a reagent, solvent, or capillary. Sample concentration (see Table 1) is a factor sometimes included. However, the aim of the method tested is to determine this concentration through the measured signal, from a calibration procedure. Thus, one evaluates the influence of the sample concentration on the sample concentration, which we do not consider a good idea. 

In robustness tests, usually the factors are examined at two extreme levels.For mixture-related and quantitative factors, these levels usually are chosen symmetrically around the nominal. The range between the extreme levels is selected so that it represents the variability that can occur when transferring the method.However, specifications to estimate such variability are not given in the ICH guidelines. Often the levels are chosen based on personal experience, knowledge, or intuition. Some define the extreme levels as nominal level +x%. However, this relative variation in factor levels is not an appropriate approach, since the absolute variation then depends on the value of the nominal level. Another possibility is to define the levels based on the precision or the uncertainty, with which... 

In the study of Teuschler et al. (2000), the models for analyzing the data were selected beforehand, and it was also decided to only focus on environmentally relevant mixtures. The authors indicated that these 2 factors were decisive for choosing the concentration levels to test. The concentration levels were not selected in relation to a specific endpoint, using the toxic unit approach. This may have been avoided because several different hepatotoxic endpoints have been measured simultaneously. The concentrations tested enabled the use of 3 types of models a multiple regression CA model, the interaction-based HI, and the proportional-response addition method. A major problem with mixture toxicity research in general is the... 

Optimum conditions. However, modeling a qualitative factor has no meaning because only discrete levels are possible and no intermediate values occur. Therefore, only mixture-related and quantitative factors are examined in the optimization step. Sequential optimization methods select successive experiments in the factor domain, which implies that again only mixture-related and quantitative factors can be examined. 

In robustness testing, the extreme levels are most frequently chosen symmetrically around the nominal for mixture-related and quantitative factors. However, for some factors, an asymmetric interval might better represent the reality or better reflect the change in response occurring. A first example is the capillary temperature. Suppose a capillary temperature of 15 °C is prescribed. Symmetric levels, selected based on uncertainty are, for instance, 10 °C and 20 °C. However, many cooling systems do not allow temperatures of more than 10 °C below room temperature therefore, 10 °C may not be attained accurately by the instrument. The lowest extreme level could then be taken equal to the nominal (15 °C). 

An adsorbent can be visualized as a porous soHd having certain characteristics. When the soHd is immersed in a Hquid mixture, the pores fill with Hquid, which at equilibrium differs in composition from that of the Hquid surrounding the particles. These compositions can then be related to each other by enrichment factors that are analogous to relative volatiHty in distillation. The adsorbent is selective for the component that is more concentrated in the pores than in the surrounding Hquid. 

In processing, it is frequently necessary to separate a mixture into its components and, in a physical process, differences in a particular property are exploited as the basis for the separation process. Thus, fractional distillation depends on differences in volatility. gas absorption on differences in solubility of the gases in a selective absorbent and, similarly, liquid-liquid extraction is based on on the selectivity of an immiscible liquid solvent for one of the constituents. The rate at which the process takes place is dependent both on the driving force (concentration difference) and on the mass transfer resistance. In most of these applications, mass transfer takes place across a phase boundary where the concentrations on either side of the interface are related by the phase equilibrium relationship. Where a chemical reaction takes place during the course of the mass transfer process, the overall transfer rate depends on both the chemical kinetics of the reaction and on the mass transfer resistance, and it is important to understand the relative significance of these two factors in any practical application. 

The transfer hydrogenation methods described above are sufficient to carry out laboratory-scale studies, but it is unlikely that a direct scale-up of these processes would result in identical yields and selectivities. This is because the reaction mixtures are biphasic liquid, gas. The gas which is distilled off is acetone from the IPA system, and carbon dioxide from the TEAF system. The rate of gas disengagement is related to the superficial surface area. As the process is scaled-up, or the height of the liquid increases, the ratio of surface area to volume decreases. In order to improve de-gassing, parameters such as stirring rates, reactor design and temperature are important, and these will be discussed along with other factors found important in process scale-up. 

S.6 Choice of Organic Modifier. Selection of the organic modifier type could be viewed as relatively simple The usual choice is between acetonitrile and methanol (rarely THF). In Chapters 2 and 4 the principal difference in the behavior of methanol and acetonitrile in the column is discussed. In short, methanol shows more predictable influence on the analyte elution, and the logarithm of the retention factor shows linear variation with the concentration of methanol in the mobile phase. Often for the effective separation of complex mixtures of related compounds, this ideal behavior is not a benefit and greater effect of the type and organic concentration on the separation efficiency is required. Acetonitrile as an organic modifier may offer these variations due to the introduction of a dual retention mechanism. The dual retention mechanism was discussed in Chapter 2. 

Immobilized metal affinity chromatography has been shown to be effective for isolating proteins from crude mixtures, as well as for selective separations of closely related proteins [2]. With respect to separation efficiency, IMAC compares well with biospecific affinity chromatography and the immobilized metalion complexes are much more robust than antibodies or enzymes. These factors make IMAC particularly well suited for scale-up to process scale chromatography. The main scale-up points to be aware of are the degree to which the column is metal saturated, the chelating agent content of the sample, and the potential of leached metal (or its interactions) within the product eluate. 

Way, Noble and Bateman (49) review the historical development of immobilized liquid membranes and propose a number of structural and chemical guidelines for the selection of support materials. Structural factors to be considered include membrane geometry (to maximize surface area per unit volume), membrane thickness (<100 pm), porosity (>50 volume Z), mean pore size (<0.1)jm), pore size distribution (narrow) and tortuosity. The amount of liquid membrane phase available for transport In a membrane module Is proportional to membrane porosity, thickness and geometry. The length of the diffusion path, and therefore membrane productivity, is directly related to membrane thickness and tortuosity. The maximum operating pressure Is directly related to the minimum pore size and the ability of the liquid phase to wet the polymeric support material. Chemically the support must be Inert to all of the liquids which It encounters. Of course, final support selection also depends on the physical state of the mixture to be separated (liquid or gas), the chemical nature of the components to be separated (inert, ionic, polar, dispersive, etc.) as well as the operating conditions of the separation process (temperature and pressure). The discussions in this chapter by Way, Noble and Bateman should be applicable the development of immobilized or supported gas membranes (50). 

---