Factor factorial methods

The simplest experimental design is one in which the effect of a single factor is investigated in two experiments. For example, the effect of method of agitation on the rate of solution of a solid in a liquid is being investigated. The experimental design is a one-factor factorial at two levels, three runs at each level, shown at the left. 

Factorial methods - factor analysis (FA) - principal components analysis ( PCA) - partial least squares modeling (PLS) - canonical correlation analysis Finding factors (causal complexes)... 

Failure to properly correct installation factors for materials of construction is one of the most common sources of error with the factorial method. Typical values of the materials factor for common engineering alloys are given in Table 6.5. 

The purchased cost of an item of equipment, free on board (FOB) is quoted by a supplier, and may be multiplied by a factor of 1.1 to give the approximate delivered cost. The factorial methods for estimating the total installed cost of a process plant are based on a combination of materials, labor, and overhead cost components. The fixed capital cost, C(-p, of a plant based on design can be estimated using the Lang Factor method [14] given by the equation... 

The proportionality factors p. are, for example, determined by cross-validation (cf. Factorial Methods Section). 

In general, the system can be represented by a functional equation containing correlated factors or variables (entrance) and responses (exit). In particular, the full factorial design requires specifying the upper and lower limits of each factor. This method suggests two limits which are maximum value represented by -1-1 and minimum value represented by -1. 

One of the problems with the use of factorial methods for compound selection is that it may be difficult or impossible to obtain a compound required for a particular treatment combination, either because the synthesis is difficult or because that particular set of factors does not exist. One way to overcome this problem, as discussed in Section 2.2.3, is D-... 

Such arrays raise the question of more generalizations of the table-oriented techniques presented in Chapters 3.9 to 3.11. The most prominent representatives of factorial methods are the so-called Tucker3 [21] and PARAFAC (parallel factor analysis) [22] models. For three-way arrays, the Tucker3 model is expressed as... 

In 2005 at the Enropean Weathering Symposium (EWS), a paper was presented which repeated the Sedona exposure for a different material (commercial polycarbonate) which indicated two important results [3] First, that paper referenced a classical SEP approach. In the classical SLR approach, researchers utilize a three-step method. In step one, a model is created, typically in laboratory artificial weathering devices nsing DOE fnll factorial methods and/or multi-linear regressions varying the inpnt factors (typically including irradiance, temperature, and moisture). In step 2, researchers then obtain time slices of environmental variables from... 

Factorial design methods cannot always be applied to QSAR-type studies. For example, i may not be practically possible to make any compounds at all with certain combination of factor values (in contrast to the situation where the factojs are physical properties sucl as temperature or pH, which can be easily varied). Under these circumstances, one woul( like to know which compounds from those that are available should be chosen to give well-balanced set with a wide spread of values in the variable space. D-optimal design i one technique that can be used for such a selection. This technique chooses subsets o... 

Duarte and colleagues used a factorial design to optimize a flow injection analysis method for determining penicillin potentiometricallyd Three factors were studied—reactor length, carrier flow rate, and sample volume, with the high and low values summarized in the following table. 

Cure Characteristics. Methods of natural rubber production and raw material properties vary from factory to factory and area to area. Consequentiy, the cure characteristics of natural mbber can vary, even within a particular grade. Factors such as maturation, method and pH of coagulation, preservatives, dry mbber content and viscosity-stabilizing agents, eg, hydroxylamine-neutral sulfate, influence the cure characteristics of natural mbber. Therefore the consistency of cure for different grades of mbber is determined from compounds mixed to the ACSl formulation (27). The ACSl formulation is as follows natural mbber, 100 stearic acid, 0.5 zinc oxide, 6.0 sulfur, 3.5 and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), 0.5. 

As an analytical method becomes more complex, the number of factors is likely to increase and the likelihood is that the simple approach to experimental design described above will not be successful. In particular, the possibility of interaction between factors that will have an effect on the experimental outcome must be considered and factorial design [2] allows such interactions to be probed. 

Factorial design One method of experimental design that allows interactions between factors to be investigated, i.e. whether changing one experimental variable changes the optimum value of another. 

Abstract A preconcentration method using Amberlite XAD-16 column for the enrichment of aluminum was proposed. The optimization process was carried out using fractional factorial design. The factors involved were pH, resin amount, reagent/metal mole ratio, elution volume and samphng flow rate. The absorbance was used as analytical response. Using the optimised experimental conditions, the proposed procedure allowed determination of aluminum with a detection limit (3o/s) of 6.1 ig L and a quantification limit (lOa/s) of 20.2 pg L, and a precision which was calculated as relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.4% for aluminum concentration of 30 pg L . The preconcentration factor of 100 was obtained. These results demonstrated that this procedure could be applied for separation and preconcentration of aluminum in the presence of several matrix. 

Initial screens can be distinguished between methods that are used to determine what factors are most important, and follow-up screens that allow optimization and improvement of crystal quality (Table 14.1). In experimental design, this is known as the Box-Wilson strategy (Box et al., 1978). The first group of screens is generally based on a so-called factorial plan which determines the polynomial coefficients of a function with k variables (factors) fitted to the response surface. It can be shown that the number of necessary experiments n increases with 2 if all interactions are taken into account. Instead of running an unrealistic, large number of initial experiments, the full factorial matrix can... 

---