Experimental techniques specific surface area

Much of the difficulty in demonstrating the mechanism of breakaway in a particular case arises from the thinness of the reaction zone and its location at the metal-oxide interface. Workers must consider (a) whether the oxide is cracked or merely recrystallised (b) whether the oxide now results from direct molecular reaction, or whether a barrier layer remains (c) whether the inception of a side reaction (e.g. 2CO - COj + C)" caused failure or (d) whether a new transport process, chemical transport or volatilisation, has become possible. In developing these mechanisms both arguments and experimental technique require considerable sophistication. As a few examples one may cite the use of density and specific surface-area measurements as routine of porosimetry by a variety of methods of optical microscopy, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction at reaction temperature of tracer, electric field and stress measurements. Excellent metallographic sectioning is taken for granted in this field of research. 

IR spectra did not show differences between the intermediate phase and the disordered cancrinite. Therefore, IR techniques fail when were used to identify these phases. One more effective way to identify disordered cancrinite and the intermediate phase is by using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Fig 1 shows the diffractogram of both tectosilicates. In the intermediate phase, the observed peaks correspond with those reported in the literature[4]. The main differences between both spectra correspond to those peaks placed between 25°<20<35°, which are more intense for the disordered cancrinite [9]. Likewise, the results of specific surface area for the intermediate phase (sample 5) and the disordered cancrinite (sample 6) were 35 and 41 m2/g respectively. The antacid capacity test was carried out with the samples 5 and 6. Fig. 2 shows the relationship between experimental pH versus the mass content of the tectosilicates. The neutralization capacity of these solids is related with its carbonate content which reacts with the synthetic gastric juice to neutralize it. In general, the behaviour of solids is similar the pH increases as the weight of the studied solid is increased. However, a less disordered cancrinite mass amount must be employed to reach a pH= 4 in comparison... 

Experimental values obtained for k3 using various techniques and for different samples [43] Powder (1) and powder (2) are calcite samples of BET specific surface areas 0.22 and 5.65 m2 g"1, respectively. 

In this study, activated carbon fibers (ACFs) deposited by copper metal were prepared by electroplating technique to remove nitric oxide (NO). The surface properties of ACFs were determined by FT-IR and XPS analyses. N2/77K adsorption isotherm characteristics, including the specific surface area, micropore volume were investigated by BET and t-plot methods respectively. And, NO removal efficiency was confirmed by gas chromatographic technique. From the experimental results, the copper metal supported on ACFs appeared to be an increase of the NO removal and a decrease of the NO adsorption efficiency reduction rate, in spite of decreasing the BET S specific surface area, micropore volume, and micro-porosity of the ACFs. Consequently, the Cu content in ACFs played an important role in improving the NO removal, which was probably due to the catalytic reactions of C-NO-Cu. 

Drug Substance (DS) Specific Surface Area (SSA) has been estimated by permeabilimetry, gas adsorption, laser light scattering and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP). Because of the simplifying and different assumptions made, none of these experimental methods can provide the absolute SSA value and a perfect agreement between the values obtained by each technique is not found However, differences in theoretical assumptions made for each technique and observed results have been useful for understanding and interpreting the texture of the powder studied. 

The specific surface area of a soil clay sample is the combined surface area of ail the particles in the sample as determined by some experimental technique and expressed per unit mass of the sample. Thus the SI units of specific surface "area are square meters per kilogram. As its definition implies, specific surface area is an operational concept. The numerical value found for a given soil clay depejadSjaa Jdtud, fi3 ... 

It is evident that if the physical adsorption capacity were limited to a close-packed monolayer, determination of the saturation limit from an experimental isotherm with a molecule of known size would provide a simple and straightforward method of estimating the specific area. The main difficulty is that in chemisorption the sites are usually widely spaced so that the saturation limit bears no obvious relationship to specific surface area while physical adsorption generally involves multilayer adsorption. The formation of the second and subsequent molecular layers commences at pressures well below that required for completion of the monolayer so it is not immediately obvious how to extract the monolayer capacity from the experimental isotherm. This problem was first solved by Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) who developed a simple model isotherm to account for multilayer adsorption and used this model to extract the monolayer capacity and hence the specific surface area. A number of refinements to the BET model and to the experimental method have been developed more recently but the basic BET method remains the most widely used technique for measurement of specific surface... 

The surface area and the dimensions and volume of the pores can be determined in many ways. A convenient method is based on measurement of the capacity for adsorption. The experimental techniques do not differ from those used for chemisorption (see Section 3.6.3). The fundamental difference between physi.sorption and chemisorption is that in chemisorption chemical bonds are formed, and, as a consequence, the number of specific sites is measured, whereas in physisorption the bonds are weak so that non-chemical properties, in particular the surface area, are determined. 

A series of criteria that should be met before XPS can be fully applied to corrosion studies of thin films has been established by Castle (LI, 1 2). These criteria, when generalized to other surface science techniques, suggest four general areas or concerns (Table I) that should be addressed before a surface technique (or in fact any experimental technique) is applied to a corrosion problem. Although these concerns or questions seem very elementary, the specific problem and solutions they imply may be very difficult to sort out. In fact, in some cases, answers can not be obtained without testing or trying the method in similar or known conditions. 

---