Experimental methods free diffusion

While catalytic HDM results in a desirable, nearly metal-free product, the catalyst in the reactor is laden with metal sulfide deposits that eventually result in deactivation. Loss of catalyst activity is attributed to both the physical obstruction of the catalyst pellets pores by deposits and to the chemical contamination of the active catalytic sites by deposits. The radial metal deposit distribution in catalyst pellets is easily observed and understood in terms of the classic theory of diffusion and reaction in porous media. Application of the theory for the design and development of HDM and HDS catalysts has proved useful. Novel concepts and approaches to upgrading metal-laden heavy residua will require more information. However, detailed examination of the chemical and physical structure of the metal deposits is not possible because of current analytical limitations for microscopically complex and heterogeneous materials. Similarly, experimental methods that reveal the complexities of the fine structure of porous materials and theoretical methods to describe them are not yet... 

This places a burden on the interpretation of static experiments (or equivalent flow reactor experiments), and conditions should therefore be established which are free of diffusion effects. In connection with these difficulties the advantage of experimental methods such as the Schwab-type reactor system becomes quite apparent, since no variations of pressure or concentration occur during the measurements in this system. 

Figure 17.5 Experimental methods to delivery a second reactant Y inside a X-containing vesicle. (1) Free (passive) diffusion ofY from outside to vesicle inside. (2) Fusion between two or more vesicles. (3) Microinjection of Y inside a giant vesicle. (4) Keeping the vesicles at the phase transition temperature (or by thermal cycles around T ). The permeability of lipid membranes is generally maximal at T - (5) Adding detergents at sublytic concentration, so that the membrane permeability is increased (especially for small solutes) without dramatic changes of membrane integrity. (6) Incorporation of pore-forming compounds in liposomes (a-hemolysin, OmpF porin,. ..)...

The various physical methods in use at present involve measurements, respectively, of osmotic pressure, light scattering, sedimentation equilibrium, sedimentation velocity in conjunction with diffusion, or solution viscosity. All except the last mentioned are absolute methods. Each requires extrapolation to infinite dilution for rigorous fulfillment of the requirements of theory. These various physical methods depend basically on evaluation of the thermodynamic properties of the solution (i.e., the change in free energy due to the presence of polymer molecules) or of the kinetic behavior (i.e., frictional coefficient or viscosity increment), or of a combination of the two. Polymer solutions usually exhibit deviations from their limiting infinite dilution behavior at remarkably low concentrations. Hence one is obliged not only to conduct the experiments at low concentrations but also to extrapolate to infinite dilution from measurements made at the lowest experimentally feasible concentrations. 

So, here is the summary of what we can do to help the experimenter be sure that his or her measurement reflects interfacial and not transport control.3 (1) Working at short times (microseconds up to a millisecond, say), increases iL and therefore lengthens the current density range in which diffusion-free measurements can be made. (2) Working at times > about 10 s means that natural convection tends to make 8 constant, i. e., independent of time. However, this time-independent value can still be reduced (and hence iL helpfully increased by methods already reviewed (Chapter 7),... 

This method has considerable advantages over the free boundary methods with regard to experimental procedure. Possible objections to the method are (a) the calibration of the cell with material of different relative molecular mass and/or shape from the material under investigation is not necessarily valid and (b) entrapment of air bubbles in the pores or adsorption of the diffusing molecules on the pore walls will invalidate the results. 

Counterion binding is not a well defined quantity, with various experimental techniques weighing the ion distribution slightly differently. Thermodynamic methods (e.g. ion activities or osmotic coefficients) monitor the free counterion concentration, transport methods (e.g. ion self diffusion or conductivity) the counterions diffusing with the micelle, and spectroscopic methods (e.g. NMR) the counterions in close contact with the micelle surface. Measurement of the effect of Na+ counterions on the symmetric S-O stretching modes would also be expected to be highly dependent on the distance of the counterion from the micelle surface (similar to the NMR method). 

As announced above these findings are in astonishing agreement with the heuristic pictures of the diffusion mechanism discussed in the framework of some microscopic diffusion models. But, besides being free of the conceptual drawbacks (the ad hoc assumptions) of the classical diffusion models, the MD method of computer simulation of diffusion in polymers makes it possible to get an even closer look at the diffusion mechanism and explain from a true atomistic level well known experimental findings. For example the results reported in (119,120) on the hopping mechanism reveal the following additional features. 

---