Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Excluded region

Fig. 4. Variation in S13C and S34S of ground water and surface water from sites 1 and 2. Data for other waters (excluding regional water unpublished) from Conly et at. (2008b). Fig. 4. Variation in S13C and S34S of ground water and surface water from sites 1 and 2. Data for other waters (excluding regional water unpublished) from Conly et at. (2008b).
Use of the concept of the Excluded Region to limit the orientation of -OH groups and both orientation and translations of water molecules (48). [Pg.29]

Figure 2.4 Schematic representation of Van der Waals corrections (i) Dotted line showing the spherical excluded region (of volume ra/3) surrounding a probe molecule (heavy circle) that is inaccessible to the center of mass of another molecule of diameter d. (ii) Wavy lines (molecular attractions) depicting the net pulling effect of attractions by surrounding molecules on a given probe molecule (heavy circle) about to strike the wall, thereby reducing the impact of collision and resulting pressure of wall collisions. Figure 2.4 Schematic representation of Van der Waals corrections (i) Dotted line showing the spherical excluded region (of volume ra/3) surrounding a probe molecule (heavy circle) that is inaccessible to the center of mass of another molecule of diameter d. (ii) Wavy lines (molecular attractions) depicting the net pulling effect of attractions by surrounding molecules on a given probe molecule (heavy circle) about to strike the wall, thereby reducing the impact of collision and resulting pressure of wall collisions.
Figure 2.9 Display of the ichthyoidal construction for a dashed test circle C centered at s = eres. For the point on C with the smallest excluded region circle, the corresponding probe circles on the inner and outer ichthyoid are shown. Published with permission from Phys. Rev. A. Figure 2.9 Display of the ichthyoidal construction for a dashed test circle C centered at s = eres. For the point on C with the smallest excluded region circle, the corresponding probe circles on the inner and outer ichthyoid are shown. Published with permission from Phys. Rev. A.
Figure 16.7. Experimental constraints on the density of axions in the galactic halo near the Sun as a function of the axion mass (upper scale) and cavity frequency (lower scale). The regions above the curves marked DFSZ and KSVZ are excluded fro the respective axion models. The currently accepted value for the local dark halo density is 0.45 GeV/cm3, which is approximately the extension of the excluded region for the KSVZ axion. (Figure from Asztalos et al.(2004).)... Figure 16.7. Experimental constraints on the density of axions in the galactic halo near the Sun as a function of the axion mass (upper scale) and cavity frequency (lower scale). The regions above the curves marked DFSZ and KSVZ are excluded fro the respective axion models. The currently accepted value for the local dark halo density is 0.45 GeV/cm3, which is approximately the extension of the excluded region for the KSVZ axion. (Figure from Asztalos et al.(2004).)...
Let us now turn to the problem of minimizing equation (5) with respect to T and a, subject to both equations (9) and (10). It is usual in practice simply to perform a sequence of calculations optimizing E against T for discrete sets of exponents aj., v.% interpolation procedure. This means that the constraint of equation (10) causes no trouble at all, since we can simply choose all our discrete sets to obey it, and forbid interpolation into the excluded regions. However, it is also easy to see that a simple transformation... [Pg.37]

Figure 2.10 shows a plot of the excluded region for the Ow-H - - O bonds discussed in Part IV, Chap. 22. [Pg.44]

As the O-ft - O angle in a three-center hydrogen bond approaches 90°, the O - - O van der Waals repulsive force comes into play which gives rise to the excluded region described in Part I. The bond length of the minor component tends to increase. For an H O hydrogen bond of 2.5 A, a covalent O-H bond of... [Pg.138]

The mixing of surfactant and polymer in the porous medium occurs due to both dispersion and the excluded volume effect for the flow of polymer molecules in porous media, which in turn could lead to the phase separation. Figure 16 illustrates the schematic explanation of the surfactant-polymer incompatibility and concomittant phase separation. We propose that around each micelle there is a region of solvent that is excluded to polymer molecules. However, when these micelles approach each other, there is overlapping of this excluded region. Therefore, if all micelles separate out then the excluded region diminishes due to the overlap of the shell and more solvent becomes available for the polymer molecules. This effect is very similar to the polymer depletion stabilization (55). Therefore, this is similar to osmotic effect where the polymer molecule tends to maximize the solvent for all possible configurations. ... [Pg.167]

The inheritance seems heterogeneous. A few are clearly autosomal dominant (H24, S30). Most are probably autosomal recessive (G14). The relationship to CNS disorders, other immune deficiencies, and chromosome 18 merit further study. Because of the heterogeneity, the definition of IgA deficiency is difficult. Serum IgA <1% MNA is safe, and <10% MNA is acceptable if increased IgA turnover can be excluded. Regional deficiencies of secretory IgA may exist. [Pg.252]

As shown in this review, the complexity of pharmacophores can range from very simple objects (two- or three-point pharmacophores) to more sophisticated objects by the addition of more pharmacophoric features, different types of geometric constraints, shape, or excluded regions information. 2D (substructure) as well as ID (relational data) information can also be added to a 3D pharmacophore. The nature of the pharmacophoric points (feature vs. substructure) will directly affect the overall performance of a database search. In general, an overspecification of the pharmacophoric points will result in hit lists with limited structural diversity. However, the use of pharmacophores is an efficient procedure since it eliminates quickly molecules that do not possess the required features. Unfortunately, all the retrieved hits are not always active as expected since the presence of the pharmacophoric groups is only one of the multiple components that account for the activity of a molecule. Other properties (physicochemical, ADME, and toxicological properties) are other components of the multidimensional approach that is used to turn a hit into a drug. [Pg.476]

Mean transit time and time to peak are the most commonly used parameters for evaluating abnormal perfusion. Some studies have employed a quantitative threshold-based approach to exclude regions of benign oligemia... [Pg.254]

Spectrum Search Search Parameters Excluded Regions Select Libraries ... [Pg.149]

Figure 11.28. The Spectrum Search dialog box Exclude Regions page. Figure 11.28. The Spectrum Search dialog box Exclude Regions page.
Figure 11.30. The short report of the spectrum search for the sample Unknown 4 based on the standard algorithm with the following parameters search sensitivity 14, maximum numbers of hits 5, minimum hit quality 300, and no excluded regions. Figure 11.30. The short report of the spectrum search for the sample Unknown 4 based on the standard algorithm with the following parameters search sensitivity 14, maximum numbers of hits 5, minimum hit quality 300, and no excluded regions.
The conductivity of a single pore is determined by the charge density of protons p and the proton mobiUty p,. As discussed above, p and are fimctions of the position within the pore. In highly hydrated PEMs, p, is highest in the bulk and smallest close to the surface. The proton distribution from simple Poisson-Boltzmann theory decreases monotonously from the interface towards the pore center. Refined calculations of the proton distribution take into accoimt the finite size of protonated complexes and a repulsive part of the intermolecular potential near the pore surface. This modified PB approach predicts an excluded region for the hydrated protons close to the surface (mainly related to the finite size of proton complexes). A maximum in exists at about 1.5 A away from the interface. From this position p decreases continuously towards the center of the pore. This density profile is in reasonable agreement with results from MD simulations [84]. Further possible refinements, such as incorporating variations of dielectric constant with position within the pore and with pore size, were not included in these calculations. [Pg.36]

Figure 4.10 also shows the excluded volume for this pair of molecules. The dashed line is roughly the closest distance that the center of a water molecule can approach. Thus, if we replace the pair of methane molecules at this specific configuration by an ethane molecule, we expect that the geometry of the excluded region will not be changed. [Pg.441]


See other pages where Excluded region is mentioned: [Pg.136]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.466]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 , Pg.429 ]




SEARCH



Exclude

© 2024 chempedia.info