Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Excitation single-beam

Now, we are not particular experts in X-ray and gamma-ray spectroscopy (nor mass spectroscopy, for that matter), but our understanding of those technologies is that they are used mainly in emission mode. Even when the exciting source is a continuum source, such as is found when an X-ray tube is used to produce the exciting X-rays for an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement, the measurement itself consists of counting the X-rays emitted from the sample after the sample absorbs an X-ray from the source. These measurements are themselves the equivalent of single-beam measurements and will thus also be Poisson-distributed in accordance with the basic physics of the phenomenon. [Pg.286]

FIGURE 7.12 Single-beam Raman control of a mixture consisting of CBrClj and CHCI3. In the unshaped case (b = 0), all accessible modes from CBrClj (solid vertical line) and CHCI3 (dashed vertical lines) are visible. Selecting a suitable b parameter, only a distinct mode of either molecule can be excited. [Pg.185]

The added benefit of intrinsic interferometric detection is only a further example of the great flexibility of using the pulse shaper in single-beam nonlinear microspectroscopy. The setup used here for CARS in its variants is, of course, also capable of immediately performing all the other nonlinear microspectroscopies simply by changing the shape of the excitation pulses with computer control. This is shown in the next section, where we discuss a broadband TPF application. [Pg.190]

The laser hres at f = 0 and causes an increase in absorbance in the sample as a consequence the intensity of light reaching the detector decreases. While laser photolysis systems are normally single-beam spectrometers, in fact they behave as dual-beam instruments. The reference beam is separated from the sample beam in time, rather than space. Thus, the reference signal is acquired before laser excitation and leads to Iq. The absorbance at time t in Figure 18.3 is given by Eq. 1 ... [Pg.852]

The model ascribes the effective polarization (Pseff(2a>)) of Eq. (3-5) to a linear combination of the bulk nonlinear polarization (Pj(2a>)) of Eq. (3.3) and a surface nonlinear polarization PNS(2o>). For a cubic medium excited by a single beam of frequency co, the bulk nonlinear polarization induced by (cu) becomes... [Pg.150]

Initial Measurements. The data in Table 2 for the fluorescence of pesticides in hexane and methanol were obtained with a single-beam spectrofluorometer. No attempt was made to adjust these values for either the intensity distribution of the excitation source or the relative sensitivity of the emission unit with wavelength. However, several observations can be drawn from this data that can be useful when applied to a HPLC fluorescence detector. [Pg.110]

A more sophisticated instrument is the Farrand VIS-UV Chromatogram Analyser CFigure 3) that can also be used to measure the fluorescence spectra as well as to obtain reliable quantitative data. This particular instrument is equipped with a Xenon lamp that emits a continuous spectrum of wavelengths. It has two monochromators and two filters, for both the excitation and emission modes and can be operated either in double-beam ratio or single beam. [Pg.129]

An important test of a transient spectrometer s accuracy, stability, and noise level is provided by a baseline spectrum. This is an averaged spectrum obtained in exactly the same way as actual data, except that the ultraviolet excitation beam is kept blocked when it would otherwise be open. The lowest trace shown in Figure 2 is a typical 5-cycle baseline spectrum for our system. Systematic deviation from zero is less than 0. 01 absorbance units throughout, and the r. m. s. noise level varies from 0. 03 near the edges to 0. 007 near the center of the spectrum. These noise variations are inversely related to the detected single beam intensity spectrum, which drops on the blue side because of the continuum distribution and the transmissive properties of our beam combiner, and on the red side because of the photocathode response of the SIT detector head. A high degree of intensity linearity in the OMA is necessary for our... [Pg.231]

Generally there are two different methods for measuring excited state spectra in the ms time regime. Typically, IR PIA spectra are not recorded with the lock-in technique but by referencing several hundred accumulated single beam spectra (by FTIR spectrometer) under illumination and in the dark, while UV/VIS PIA uses a lock-in detector to filter out signal changes due to photoexcitation. [Pg.18]

Figure 11.54 The bimodal growth of Ag nanoprisms. a) TEM image of a sample of Ag nanoprisms formed using single-beam excitation (550 20 nm) inset, histograms used to charactaize the size distribution as bimodal. b, c) TEM images of nanoprism stacks showing that nanoprisms have nearly identical thicknesses (9.8 1.0 nm). d) Schematic diagram of the proposed light-induced fusion growth of Ag nanoprisms. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd Nature [109] C> (2003). Figure 11.54 The bimodal growth of Ag nanoprisms. a) TEM image of a sample of Ag nanoprisms formed using single-beam excitation (550 20 nm) inset, histograms used to charactaize the size distribution as bimodal. b, c) TEM images of nanoprism stacks showing that nanoprisms have nearly identical thicknesses (9.8 1.0 nm). d) Schematic diagram of the proposed light-induced fusion growth of Ag nanoprisms. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd Nature [109] C> (2003).
Figure 1. Fluorescence intensity versus incident laser light intensity at 320 nm. The straight line was fit to the low-intensity data and is drawn with the assumption that the fluorescence intensity is proportional to the intensity of the incident laser light. The curved solid line is the result predicted by the phenomenological equation for single-photon excitation with y = 4.2 X 10 cm ls. The area of the exciting laser beam was about 0.1 cm. ... Figure 1. Fluorescence intensity versus incident laser light intensity at 320 nm. The straight line was fit to the low-intensity data and is drawn with the assumption that the fluorescence intensity is proportional to the intensity of the incident laser light. The curved solid line is the result predicted by the phenomenological equation for single-photon excitation with y = 4.2 X 10 cm ls. The area of the exciting laser beam was about 0.1 cm. ...

See other pages where Excitation single-beam is mentioned: [Pg.2488]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.123 ]




SEARCH



Single beam

Singly excited

© 2024 chempedia.info