Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Exchange integrals basis sets

The goal of pseudospectral methods is to reduce the formal dependence of the Coulomb and Exchange operators in the basis set representation (two-electron integrals, eq. (3.51)) to This can be accomplished by switching between a grid... [Pg.174]

The exchange repulsion energy in EFP2 is derived as an expansion in the intermolecular overlap. When this overlap expansion is expressed in terms of frozen LMOs on each fragment, the expansion can reliably be truncated at the quadratic term [44], This term does require that each EFP carries a basis set, and the smallest recommended basis set is 6-31-1— -G(d,p) [45] for acceptable results. Since the basis set is used only to calculate overlap integrals, the computation is very fast and quite large basis sets are realistic. [Pg.201]

The various MO calculations use different basis sets and have different ways of calculating multicenter coulomb and exchange integrals. The current trend in MO is to expand as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO). The atomic orbitals are represented by Slater functions with expansion in gaussian functions, taking advantage of the additive rule. When the calculation is performed in this... [Pg.166]

If the basis set is restricted to one pn basis function on each sp2 carbon, if the two-electron integrals ignore all three-center or four-center ones, and if we exclude exchange components, one has the Pariser-Parr-Pople model. If, further, all two-electron integrals are set to zero except for the repulsion between opposite spins on the same site and the one-electron tunneling terms are restricted to nearest neighbors, the result is the Hubbard Hamiltonian... [Pg.10]

While in principle all of the methods discussed here are Hartree-Fock, that name is commonly reserved for specific techniques that are based on quantum-chemical approaches and involve a finite cluster of atoms. Typically one uses a standard technique such as GAUSSIAN-82 (Binkley et al., 1982). In its simplest form GAUSSIAN-82 utilizes single Slater determinants. A basis set of LCAO-MOs is used, which for computational purposes is expanded in Gaussian orbitals about each atom. Exchange and Coulomb integrals are treated exactly. In practice the quality of the atomic basis sets may be varied, in some cases even including d-type orbitals. Core states are included explicitly in these calculations. [Pg.532]

An alternative procedure consists in using a numerical integration scheme to evaluate the exchange-correlation contribution. In this case, no auxiliary basis set is needed for the exchange-correlation terms, and numerically more reliable results can be obtained. [Pg.187]

The problem of evaluating matrix elements of the interelectron repulsion part of the potential between many-electron molecular Sturmian basis functions has the degree of difficulty which is familiar in quantum chemistry. It is not more difficult than usual, but neither is it less difficult. Both in the present method and in the usual SCF-CI approach, the calculations refer to exponential-type orbitals, but for the purpose of calculating many-center Coulomb and exchange integrals, it is convenient to expand the ETO s in terms of a Cartesian Gaussian basis set. Work to implement this procedure is in progress in our laboratory. [Pg.219]

As presented, the Roothaan SCF process is carried out in a fully ab initio manner in that all one- and two-electron integrals are computed in terms of the specified basis set no experimental data or other input is employed. As described in Appendix F, it is possible to introduce approximations to the coulomb and exchange integrals entering into the Fock matrix elements that permit many of the requisite F, v elements to be evaluated in terms of experimental data or in terms of a small set of fundamental orbital-level coulomb interaction integrals that can be computed in an ab initio manner. This approach forms the basis of so-called semi-empirical methods. Appendix F provides the reader with a brief introduction to such approaches to the electronic structure problem and deals in some detail with the well known Htickel and CNDO- level approximations. [Pg.351]


See other pages where Exchange integrals basis sets is mentioned: [Pg.80]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.2740]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.228 ]




SEARCH



Exchange integral

Integrity basis

© 2024 chempedia.info