Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evolutionary Mutation, Crossover

Creation of a new Kbrary (the next generation) by means of evolutionary operators (crossover and mutation) from the best catalysts (identified by their catalytic performance) of all materials of all previous generations. [Pg.222]

The evolutionary process of a genetic algorithm is accomplished by genetic operators which translate the evolutionary concepts of selection, recombination or crossover, and mutation into data processing to solve an optimization problem dynamically. Possible solutions to the problem are coded as so-called artificial chromosomes, which are changed and adapted throughout the optimization process until an optimrun solution is obtained. [Pg.467]

In evolutionary strategies, a parent string produces X offspring the fittest of the 1 + X individuals is selected to be the single parent for the next generation of offspring. There is no crossover operator in evolutionary strategies, only mutation. [Pg.162]

Table 10.10 shows the performance of the evolutionary solver on this problem in eight runs, starting from an initial point of zero. The first seven runs used the iteration limits shown, but the eighth stopped when the default time limit of 100 seconds was reached. For the same number of iterations, different final objective function values are obtained in each run because of the random mechanisms used in the mutation and crossover operations and the randomly chosen initial population. The best value of 811.21 is not obtained in the run that uses the most iterations or computing time, but in the run that was stopped after 10,000 iterations. This final value differs from the true optimal value of 839.11 by 3.32%, a significant difference, and the final values of the decision variables are quite different from the optimal values shown in Table 10.9. [Pg.407]

The mutation and crossover steps muddy the picture a little, but it appears from the second generation (Fig. 5) that neither of the two poorest designs from generation 1 have made it through the selection process. In particular, the small dark lighthouse from population 1, which was clearly an also-ran in the evolutionary stakes, has been eliminated, and all the designs, while still of little architectural merit, are at least functional. The evolutionary steps are now repeated,... [Pg.15]

GA is a programming technique that mimics biological evolution to find true or approximate solutions to optimization and search problems. They are a specific instance of evolutionary algorithms that use techniques inspired by evolutionary biology such as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover. GAs were developed by John Holland and his team [67]. [Pg.110]

Population sizes in ES are extremely small compared to other evolutionary algorithms. At the extreme, it is possible to have a population size of just one. This is known as a two-membered, or (1 -p 1), ES. There are considered to be two members because there is always a parent and a child. The (1 -P 1) refers to the fact that there is one parent, which produces one offspring in each generation. In this case, there is no crossover, just mutation. When the child is created, it is compared to the parent and, if it has a greater fitness, replaces the parent. [Pg.132]

Based on genetic and evolutionary principles, GAs work by repeatedly modifying a population of artificial structures (chromosomes) through the application of selection, crossover, and mutation operators. The evaluation of optimisation happens with the adaptation function (fitness), which is represented by the objective problem function in study (involving the mathematical model of the analysed system), that determines the process performance. [Pg.690]

The sequence identity between PcL and PMIL is over 77%, which facilitated mutational exchange between the two parallel evolution pathways and allowed us to switch protein sequence blocks to create chimeric proteins of HRPLs with hybrid or even enhanced features. To favor mulhple crossover events between laccase scaffolds, in vitro and in vivo DNA recombination methods were combined in a single evolutionary step (see Section 1.6). Chimeras with up to six crossover events per sequence were identified, which generated active laccase hybrids with combined characteristics in terms of substrate affinity, pH activity, and thermostability [54]. Interestingly, some chimeras showed higher thermostabilities than the original... [Pg.10]


See other pages where Evolutionary Mutation, Crossover is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.1530]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.118]   


SEARCH



Crossover

© 2024 chempedia.info