Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluation of Nonbonded Interactions

The boat form is an alternate conformation of cyclohexane. Actually, by a slight twist, the nonbonded interactions in the boat form can be reduced (twist boat conformation). [Pg.35]

Although the chair form of cyclohexane is the preferred conformation, other conformations are known and in some systems are required. [Pg.35]

The lactone moeity acts as a stereochemical bridge, maintaining the hydroxyl and carboxylic acid groups in a cis relationship. [Pg.35]

Stereoanalysis of monosubstituted cyclohexanes involves two distinct stages  [Pg.35]

Therefore, we can compute the equilibrium composition of the two methylcyclo-hexane conformers as shown below  [Pg.36]


Schulten238 outlined the development of a multiple-time-scale approximation (distance class algorithm) for the evaluation of nonbonded interactions, as well as the fast multipole expansion (FME). efficiency of the FME was demonstrated when the method outperformed the direct evaluation of Coulomb forces for 5000 atoms by a large margin and showed, for systems of up to 24,000 atoms, a linear dependence on atom number. [Pg.269]

U. Dinur and A. T. Hagler,/ Am. Chem. Soc., 111,5149 (1989). Direct Evaluation of Nonbonding Interactions from ah Initio Calculations. [Pg.271]

It is possible to evaluate cohesive energies, packing characteristics and other properties of molecular crystals quantitatively on the basis of nonbonded interactions between atoms (Kitaigorodsky, 1973). The analytical expressions are of the form... [Pg.11]

The conventional concepts and computational methodologies for nonbonded and intermolecular interactions are essentially atom based [48], and therefore are conceptually and operationally suitable for molecules comprising the gamut of the elements, and where functional groups are often less relevant. Atom-based evaluation of intermolecular interaction energies has not yet been challenged by an alternative, and will underlie the remainder of this article. [Pg.159]

While the evaluation of the interactions in a dense system is computationally beneficial, the underlying lattice structure requires the usage of special simulation techniques to accurately calculate the contribution of the nonbonded interactions to the pressure. These difficulties can be mitigated by using a soft, coarse-grained, off-lattice model. Since forces are well defined in off-lattice models, one can use Brownian dynamics or dissipative particle dynamics methods [97-103]. Also, simulations under constant pressure or surface tension are feasible. [Pg.225]

Goodman JM, Paton RS (2009) Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking how reliable are force fields A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions. J Chem Inf Model 49 944-955... [Pg.75]

The results of calculations for n-alkanes, which are applicable to the PM chain as well, provide an illustrative example. In Figure 1, an energy contour map calculated for two consecutive internal C-C bonds is shown at intervals of 1 kcalmol (4.2kJmor ). In these calculations, an intrinsic threefold potential with barrier height of 2.8 kcalmol" (11.7 kJmol" ) was assigned to rotation about the C-C bond, and Buckingham s 6-exp energy functions were employed for the evaluation of nonbonded interatomic interactions... [Pg.52]

In LN, the bonded interactions are treated by the approximate linearization, and the local nonbonded interactions, as well as the nonlocal interactions, are treated by constant extrapolation over longer intervals Atm and At, respectively). We define the integers fci,fc2 > 1 by their relation to the different timesteps as Atm — At and At = 2 Atm- This extrapolation as used in LN contrasts the modern impulse MTS methods which only add the contribution of the slow forces at the time of their evaluation. The impulse treatment makes the methods symplectic, but limits the outermost timestep due to resonance (see figures comparing LN to impulse-MTS behavior as the outer timestep is increased in [88]). In fact, the early versions of MTS methods for MD relied on extrapolation and were abandoned because of a notable energy drift. This drift is avoided by the phenomenological, stochastic terms in LN. [Pg.252]

Fig. 1. Nonbonded force evaluation may be distributed among processors according to atomic coordinates, as in spatial decomposition (left), or according to the indices of the interacting atoms, as in force-matrix decomposition (right). Shades of gray indicate processors to which interactions are assigned. Fig. 1. Nonbonded force evaluation may be distributed among processors according to atomic coordinates, as in spatial decomposition (left), or according to the indices of the interacting atoms, as in force-matrix decomposition (right). Shades of gray indicate processors to which interactions are assigned.
Methods of decomposing the nonbonded force evaluation fall into two classes, spatial decomposition [15] in which atoms and their interactions are divided among processors based on their coordinates, and force-matrix decomposition [16] in which the calculation of the interaction between a pair of atoms is assigned to a processor without considering the location of either atom (Fig. 1). Spatial decomposition scales better to large numbers of... [Pg.474]

The lion s share of the computer-time for the least-squares process has to be provided for forming the Z-matrix. The elements of this matrix are evaluated partly numerically and partly analytically in the calculations of Lifson and Warshel (17). In certain cases, strong parameter correlations may occur. Therefore caution is demanded when inverting the matrix C. Also from investigations other than consistent force-field calculations it is known that such correlations frequently occur among the parameters for the nonbonded interactions (34,35). Another example of force field parameter correlations was encountered by Ermer and Lifson (19) in the course of the calculation of olefin properties. When... [Pg.176]

A final useful index of sigma nonbonded interactions between lone pairs is the partial bond order p (Xm, Yn) which is evaluated over the MO s which result from the interaction of the lone pair group MO s with the sigma HOMO and vacant MO s of the coupling unit. This index is intimately connected with the type of analysis employed in this work. In our survey of a variety of problems of molecular structure we shall provide computational results pertinent to the analysis outlined, i e. all or some of the following indices will be provided ... [Pg.45]


See other pages where Evaluation of Nonbonded Interactions is mentioned: [Pg.189]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.630]   


SEARCH



Interactions, nonbonding

Nonbond Interactions

Nonbonded interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info