Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Eulerian framework

The thermal conductivity of polymeric fluids is very low and hence the main heat transport mechanism in polymer processing flows is convection (i.e. corresponds to very high Peclet numbers the Peclet number is defined as pcUUk which represents the ratio of convective to conductive energy transport). As emphasized before, numerical simulation of convection-dominated transport phenomena by the standard Galerkin method in a fixed (i.e. Eulerian) framework gives unstable and oscillatory results and cannot be used. [Pg.90]

Governing flow equations, originally written in an Eulerian framework, should hence be modified to take into account the movement of the mesh. The time derivative of a variable / in a moving framework is found as... [Pg.103]

As described in Chapter 3, Section 5.1 the application of the VOF scheme in an Eulerian framework depends on the solution of the continuity equation for the free boundary (Equation (3.69)) with the model equations. The developed algorithm for the solution of the described model equations and updating of the free surface boundaries is as follows ... [Pg.145]

For canonical turbulent flows (Pope 2000), the flow parameters required to complete the CRE models are readily available. However, for the complex flow fields present in most chemical reactors, the flow parameters must be found either empirically or by solving a CFD turbulence model. If the latter course is taken, the next logical step would be to attempt to reformulate the CRE model in terms of a set of transport equations that can be added to the CFD model. The principal complication encountered when following this path is the fact that the CRE models are expressed in a Lagrangian framework, whilst the CFD models are expressed in an Eulerian framework. One of the main goals of this book... [Pg.23]

An alternative method to RTD theory for treating non-ideal reactors is the use of zone models. In this approach, the reactor volume is broken down into well mixed zones (see the example in Fig. 1.5). Unlike RTD theory, zone models employ an Eulerian framework that ignores the age distribution of fluid elements inside each zone. Thus, zone models ignore micromixing, but provide a model for macromixing or large-scale inhomogeneity inside the reactor. [Pg.29]

In an Eulerian framework the spatial coordinates form a fixed frame of reference through which the fluid flows. The velocity vector is considered to be a continuous function of time and space, which are independent variables,... [Pg.25]

Riding along with a fluid packet is a Lagrangian notion. However, in the limit of dt - 0, the distance traveled dx vanishes. In this limit, (i.e., at a point in time and space) the Eulerian viewpoint is achieved. The relationship between the Lagrangian and Eulerian representations is established in terms of Eq. 2.52, recognizing the equivalence of the displacement rate in the flow direction and the flow velocity. In the Eulerian framework the... [Pg.26]

Overall our objective is to cast the conservation equations in the form of partial differential equations in an Eulerian framework with the spatial coordinates and time as the independent variables. The approach combines the notions of conservation laws on systems with the behavior of control volumes fixed in space, through which fluid flows. For a system, meaning an identified mass of fluid, one can apply well-known conservation laws. Examples are conservation of mass, momentum (F = ma), and energy (first law of thermodynamics). As a practical matter, however, it is impossible to keep track of all the systems that represent the flow and interaction of countless packets of fluid. Fortunately, as discussed in Section 2.3, it is possible to use a construct called the substantial derivative that quantitatively relates conservation laws on systems to fixed control volumes. [Pg.67]

In addition to overall mass conservation, we are concerned with the conservation laws for individual chemical species. Beginning in a way analogous to the approach for the overall mass-conservation equation, we seek an equation for the rate of change of the mass of species k, mk. Here the extensive variable is N = mu and the intensive variable is the mass fraction, T = mk/m. Homogeneous chemical reaction can produce species within the system, and species can be transported into the system by molecular diffusion. There is convective transport as well, but it represented on the left-hand side through the substantial derivative. Thus, in the Eulerian framework, using the relationship between the system and the control volume yields... [Pg.92]

The study of mixing effects on chemical reactions has been an active area of research since the pioneering papers of Danckwerts (1958) and Zwietering (1959). The topic has become a part of classical Chemical Reaction Engineering and has been discussed in textbooks (Froment and Bischoff, 1990 Levenspiel, 1999 Westerterp et al., 1984) and review articles (Villermaux, 1991). Historically, this study has progressed in two parallel branches, based on the Lagrangian and Eulerian frameworks of description, respectively. [Pg.210]

Conservation of Mass. The law of conservation of mass for a compressible medium is usually expressed in an Eulerian framework as, "the time rate change of mass density at any point is equal to the negative divergence of the momentum density at that point."... [Pg.261]

Until 10 to 15 years ago the combined approach of macromixing and micromixing models was very widely used in the field of CRE but gradually CFD-based strategies have replaced the first mentioned strategy. In this respect it should be noted that this change also introduced big conceptual differences because the traditional CRE approach is usually formulated in the age space of fluid parcels whereas in CFD approaches a Eulerian framework is often adopted. Subsequently a brief overview of CFD-based approaches for reacting flows is presented and the current limitations are also indicated. [Pg.261]

The equations for the gas and particle phases are solved separately, with coupling between phases. The time-averaged gas equations are solved in an Eulerian framework. [Pg.911]

Eulerian framework is used for continuous phase. Influence of dispersed phase via averaging over large number of tra jectories... [Pg.89]

It may be noted that the discussion so far has not considered turbulent flow. When the continuous phase flow field is turbulent, its influence on particle trajectories needs to be represented in the model. The situation becomes quite complex in the case of two-way coupling between continuous phase and dispersed phase, since the presence of dispersed phase can affect turbulence in the continuous phase. The Eulerian framework may be more suitable to model such cases. Even when dispersed phase particles are assumed to have no influence on the continuous phase flow field, the trajectories of the particles will be affected by the presence of turbulence in the continuous phase. For such cases, it is necessary to calculate the trajectories of a sufficiently large number of particles using the instantaneous local velocity to represent the random effects of turbulence on particle dispersion. [Pg.100]

In this approach, the finite volume methods discussed in the previous chapter can be applied to simulate the continuous fluid (in a Eulerian framework). Various algorithms for treating pressure-velocity coupling, and the discussion on other numerical issues like discretization schemes are applicable. The usual interpolation practices (discussed in the previous chapter) can be used. When solving equations of motion for a continuous fluid in the presence of the dispersed phase, the major differences will be (1) consideration of phase volume fraction in calculation of convective and diffusive terms, and (2) calculation of additional source terms due to the presence of dispersed phase particles. For the calculation of phase volume fraction and additional source terms due to dispersed phase particles, it is necessary to calculate trajectories of the dispersed phase particles, in addition to solving the equations of motion of the continuous phase. [Pg.204]

There are two main approaches for the numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow 1) Eulerian framework for the gas phase and Lagrangian framework for the dispersed phase (E-L) and 2) Eulerian framework for all phases (E-E). In the E-L approach, trajectories of dispersed phase particles are calculated by solving Newton s second law of motion for each dispersed particle, and the motion of the continuous phase (gas phase) is modeled using an Eulerian framework with the coupling of the particle-gas interaction force. This approach is also referred to as the distinct element method or discrete particle method when applied to a granular system. The fluid forces acting upon particles would include the drag force, lift force, virtual mass force, and Basset history force.Moreover, particle-wall and particle-particle collision models (such as hard sphere model, soft sphere model, or Monte Carlo techniques) are commonly employed for this approach. In the E-E approach, the particle cloud is treated as a continuum. Local mean... [Pg.1004]


See other pages where Eulerian framework is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.2103]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.370]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 , Pg.27 , Pg.146 , Pg.150 ]




SEARCH



Eulerian

© 2024 chempedia.info