Errors nature

RumeUiart D E, G W Hinton and R J Williams 1986. Learning Representations by Back-propagatin Errors. Nature 323 533-536. 

This example illustrates the complexity and trial and error nature of stage-by-stage calculation. 

Although the existence or absence of a particular process can often be determined from observed data, an assessment of how well an algorithm represents the process is often difficult to make due to observation errors, natural variations in field data, and lack of sufficient data on individual component processes. In such circumstances, model validity must be inferred or possibly based on comparisons with laboratory data obtained under controlled conditions. Often laboratory data provide the basis for developing an algorithm since field data are so much more difficult and expensive to collect and interpret. Examples of system representation errors and their analysis were presented at the Pellston workshop (6 ). 

Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J., Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature, 323,533, 1986. 

This book would probably never have been written without the friendly insistence of G. Bram and the help of O. Eisenstein, J. M. Lefour, A. Lubineau, Y. T. N Guessan, P. Metzner, J. P. Pradere and A. Sevin. I have also benefited from the vast chemical knowledge which J. Boivin and S. Zard have regularly shared with me. Many thanks are due to D. Carmichael for the first English draft and for correcting a number of obscurities and numerical errors. Naturally, I am solely responsible for any mistakes in this book. 

Fusion power generators are inherently safe. The magnetic confinement of the plasma must be carefully controlled and balanced to sustain the nuclear reaction. Any disturbance of the operating conditions will result in termination of the reaction. No combination of system failure, operator error, natural disaster or sabotage can cause the fusion reaction to run away. A nuclear explosion, melt down or similar catastrophic accident is not possible. A violent event, one of sufficient magnitude to disrupt the total reactor, could cause a chemical or electrical fire similar to any industrial fire. 

Despite its trial and error nature, such a method is easily implemented on a spreadsheet. We make two columns, one containing the experimental data, the other the theoretical curve as calculated with assumed parameter values. In a third column we calculate the squares of the residuals (i.e., the differences between the two), and we add all these squares to form the sum of squares, SRR. This sum of the residuals squared, SRR, will be our data-fitting criterion. We now adjust the various assumed parameters that define the theoretical curve, in such a direction that SRR decreases. We keep doing this for the various parameters until SRR has reached a minimum. Presumably, this minimum yields the best-fitting parameter values. Incidentally, the third column is not needed when we use the command =SUMXMY2[experimental data, theoretical data). 

Of course, this requires the excess free energy, which is exactly what we are seeking to estimate So this emphasizes the trial-and-error nature of determining a suitable (r ), and may seem a little discouraging. But in fact the result in Eq. (2.15) is most useful, as we now explain ... 

All data in the experimental sciences are subject to some random variability due to a variety of causes such as measurement error, natural variability in laboratory specimens, uncontrolled variation in external conditions, and so on. With careful control of the measurement process and of laboratory conditions, this variation can sometimes be kept very small. However, in other cases, it may be more substantial and then the need for statistics is more apparent. Random variation is often described, perhaps rather misleadingly, as the error component of variation. However, it is essential to realize that there is nothing abnormal about random variation, though the experimenter will naturally wish to reduce it as far as possible. 

The editors have convinced 146 experts from many parts of the world to contribute their knowledge and to share the secrets of their successful and unsuccessful experiences. Despite all that is known, there are still failures engineers are human, they make errors nature is capricious, it brings unexpected surprises But bridge engineers learn from failures, and even errors help to foster progress. 

In the course of the history of the lichen symbiosis and, indeed, in the histories of all symbiotic systems, there must, because of the trial and error nature of evolution, have been numerous examples of incipient symbiosis. Interaction between various algae and fungi at the unicellular and multicellular level is a matter of common observation, particularly with reference to algal covers on tree trunks. But we still cannot identify a single example of early interaction between alga and fungus as a case of incipient lichen symbiosis. 

Place a small covered magnetic stirring har in the flask of precipitate and whilst stirring vigorously pipette duplicate portions of 10, 5, 2, 1, and 0.5 ml of slurry directly onto membrane filters in the Millipore filtration equipment A little water should be put in the filter funnel first and the aliquot of slurry added (rinse the pipette into the funnel) before applying suction. This ensures a more uniform dispersion of precipitate on the membrane filter. Dry the ten separate planchettes and precipitates thus obtained. Count each precipitate, normalize each count to the radioactive standard, and correct for coincidence error, natural background, etc. The counts found for the 10-, 5-, 2-, 1-, and 0.5-ml aliquots are multiplied by... 

---