Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equilibrium rate, surface pressure

If the spreading is into a limited surface area, as in a laboratory experiment, the film front rather quickly reaches the boundaries of the trough. The film pressure at this stage is low, and the now essentially uniform film more slowly increases in v to the final equilibrium value. The rate of this second-stage process is mainly determined by the rate of release of material from the source, for example a crystal, and the surface concentration F [46]. Franses and co-workers [47] found that the rate of dissolution of hexadecanol particles sprinkled at the water surface controlled the increase in surface pressure here the slight solubility of hexadecanol in the bulk plays a role. [Pg.111]

The dynamic surface tension of a monolayer may be defined as the response of a film in an initial state of static quasi-equilibrium to a sudden change in surface area. If the area of the film-covered interface is altered at a rapid rate, the monolayer may not readjust to its original conformation quickly enough to maintain the quasi-equilibrium surface pressure. It is for this reason that properly reported II/A isotherms for most monolayers are repeated at several compression/expansion rates. The reasons for this lag in equilibration time are complex combinations of shear and dilational viscosities, elasticity, and isothermal compressibility (Manheimer and Schechter, 1970 Margoni, 1871 Lucassen-Reynders et al., 1974). Furthermore, consideration of dynamic surface tension in insoluble monolayers assumes that the monolayer is indeed insoluble and stable throughout the perturbation if not, a myriad of contributions from monolayer collapse to monomer dissolution may complicate the situation further. Although theoretical models of dynamic surface tension effects have been presented, there have been very few attempts at experimental investigation of these time-dependent phenomena in spread monolayer films. [Pg.60]

The differences in time-dependent adsorption behavior between 99% PVAC at 25° and 50°C demonstrate the influence of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the adsorption process. The limiting surface pressure of the hydrophobic water-soluble polymer appears to be 33 mN/m, approximately 7 mN/m below that of commonly used surfactants. The rate of attainment of equilibrium surface pressure values is faster if there is uniformity of the hydrophobic segments among the repeating units of the macromolecule. [Pg.127]

When an ideal monolayer is compressed, A = A - vt, where t is the time after the experiment begins. At t = 0, A = A, the uncompressed area of the monolayer, and u A = n RT at equilibrium. From equations (2) and (3), a simp e°rela ionship for the surface pressure as a function of area, compression rate and time is obtained ... [Pg.188]

Furthermore, we employ the same assumptions to describe a different set of hysteresis experiments a monolayer with surface pressure it at equilibrium is subjected to expansion at a constant speed of v cm /sec. The theoretical curves of surface pressure are plotted against area for various q-values in Figure 4. The curves show that the reduction of surface pressure decreases when the expansion rate is decreased for a given mono-layer, i.e. as q becomes more negative. In Figure 5, curves are plotted for q = -2 with the two different modes initial compression and initial expansion. Because the theoretical curves of the second and subsequent cycles in both modes almost coincide, we can expect that the surface pressure vs. area curves will be independent of how the hysteresis experiment starts after about two initial cycles. [Pg.190]

Figure 6-8 shows how the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in equilibrium with surface water oscillates in phase with the fluctuations in precipitation rate, saturation state, and temperature. The oscillations in alkalinity and bicarbonate concentrations have shifted in phase by about 90° because these quantities decrease when precipitation and evaporation are removing carbon from the system at above-average rates. [Pg.94]

Another real-time study of the reaction of M-FA films with H2S utilized ellip-sometry to monitor changes in film thickness concurrent with metal sulfide formation (53). The reactions appeared to reach equilibrium within the same period of time (within 2 h), with a change per monolayer of 0.2 nm for CdBe and 0.9 nm for both CuBe and ZnBe. Their ellipsometry results, in agreement with Peng et al. (66), also show a dependence of the reaction rate on the H2S pressure and the surface pressure at which the films were deposited. [Pg.263]

If the adsorption of A is the rate determining step in the sequence of adsorption, surface reaction and desorption processes, then equation 3.71 will be the appropriate equation to use for expressing the overall chemical rate. To be of use, however, it is first necessary to express CA, Cv and Cs in terms of the partial pressures of reactants and products. To do this an approximation is made it is assumed that all processes except the adsorption of A are at equilibrium. Thus the processes involving B and P are in a state of pseudo-equilibrium. The surface concentration of B can therefore be expressed in terms of an equilibrium constant KB for the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of B ... [Pg.146]

Adsorption isotherm equations can in principle be derived by first formulating the chemical potential of the adsorbate p° in terms of a model, then equating p to p. Although it is not impossible to derive expressions for p by thermodynamic means, statistical approaches are more appropriate because in this way the molecular picture can be made explicit. Moreover, adsorbates are not macroscopic systems, which is a prerequisite for applying thermodynamics, and statistical thermodynamics lends itself very well to the derivation of expressions for the surface pressure. Another approach is based on kinetic considerations expressions for the rates of adsorption and desorption are formulated at equilibrium the two are equal. [Pg.36]

Example 12-1 Wakao et al. studied the conversion of ortho hydrogen to para hydrogen in a fixed-bed tubular-flow reactor (0.50 in. ID) at isothermal conditions of — 196°C (liquid nitrogen temperature). The feed contained a mole fraction P-H2 of fc, = 0.250., The equilibrium value at — 196°C is = 0.5026. The catalyst is Ni on AI2O3 and has a surface area of 155 m /g. The mole fraction p-Hj in the exit stream from the reactor was measured for different flow rates and pressures and for three sizes of catalyst granular particles of equivalent spherical diameter, 0.127 mm, granular particles 0.505 mm, and nominal f x -in. cylindrical pellets. The flow rate, pressure, and composition measurements are given in Table 12-1. [Pg.470]

The experimental apparatus for measuring surface pressures has been described by Christodoulou and Rosano (4). The compression and expansion rates were between 0.009 and 0.03 cm/sec. Isotherms were determined when the system regained equilibrium after short periods of compression. [Pg.269]

Elastic properties of interface. The surface tension of the solution interface is less than the surface tension of the pure solvent interface. The difference is equal to the surface pressure of surfactant molecules [9, 109, 414], This does not contradict the fact that the films forming the skeleton of the foam possess increased strength and elasticity. The equilibrium surface layer of a pure liquid is ideally inelastic. Under the action of external forces, the free surface increases not because of extension (an increase in the distance between the molecules in the near-surface layer) but because new molecules are coming from the bulk. A decrease in the equilibrium tension as some amount of surfactant is added does not mean that the elasticity of the surface decreases, since this surface does not possess elastic properties under slow external actions. Nevertheless, we point out that even surfaces of pure liquids possess elastic properties [465] (dynamic surface tension [232]) under very rapid external actions whose characteristic time is less than the time of self-adsorption relaxation of the surface layer. This property must not depend on the existence of an adsorption layer of surfactant. At the same time, surfactants impart additional elastic properties to the surface both at low and high strain rates. [Pg.310]

Here D is the diffusion coefficient, t is the time, t is a dummy integration variable. Using Equation (8), respective T(t) dependencies can be obtained, while the Equations (l)-(7) serve as boundary condition for the diffusion model. This set of equations yield a quasi-equilibrium diffusion model which means that at a given surface pressure the composition of the surface layer under dynamic conditions is equal to that in the equilibrium. Another regime of adsorption kinetics, called kinetic model, can also be described by assuming compositions of the adsorption layer that can differ from the equilibrium state. The deviation of the adsorption layer from the equilibrium composition is the result of the finite rate of the transition process between the adsorption states. In case of two adsorption states we have6... [Pg.156]

This amounts to saying that the rate of evaporation from the droplet at any time can be calculated from the equilibrium rate corresponding to the instantaneous partial pressure of A just above the surface of the drop. From Henry s law, [A(/ p, t)] = H Aps(t), and therefore we can rewrite (12.52) using [A(/ , r)], the concentration of A at the droplet surface as... [Pg.552]

A more advanced model was suggested very recently by [78] based on the adsorption isotherm for proteins given by Eq. (2.124). In addition to diffusion of the molecules in the bulk, a kinetic process was assumed equivalent to the mechanism used in the mixed kinetic model. The configuration changes, i.e. orientation of a globular protein molecule to the surface, were characterised by one rate constant k. The following Fig. 4.7 shows model calculations where the following parameters were used coi = 2.5-10 m /mol, W2 = 5.010 m /mol (i.e. coj/ ] = 2), a i = 200. These parameters correspond to those for HSA adsorbed at the water/air interface [79]. The diffusion coefficient was taken to be D = lO cmVs and the protein concentration as 10 mol/I. The equilibrium surface pressure of the protein solutions was taken to be 20 mN/m, typical for HSA at this concentration. It should be noted first that the time required for an experimentally observable decrease of the surface tension, say by 0.5 mN/m, is about 3100 s... [Pg.305]

The other characteristic that can be deduced from experimental data is that plots of the rate as a function of t (Equation 7) do not extrapolate to zero rate at infinite time as required by a purely diffusion controlled process ( ). This indicates the presence of a barrier to the desorption step at the interface. This is confirmed by the very much smaller values for the equilibrium sub surface concentrations calculated from desorption kinetics than those expected from the adsorption isotherm at the same pressures. [Pg.174]

Two theories have been proposed to predict flow of a saturated or nearly saturated liquid through an orifice, namely, an equilibrium flow theory and a metastable flow theory. In the equilibrium model it was assumed that the vapor bubbles formed throughout the stream cross section at the section where the saturation pressure is reached [ ]. Experimental measurements of the flow of saturated water have shown that the mass flow rates are considerably higher than predicted by calculations based on the equilibrium theory. Surface tension effects have been used to explain the variance between the experimental results and the predicted values. It is postulated that vapor bubble formation is retarded because of the surface tension. [Pg.293]

Our investigation shows that the vapor pressures of solid bismuth and antimony tellurides and of bismuth selenide are quite low. The working temperatures of thermoelements made of these substances do not exceed 700 C. Under such conditions, the evaporation of thermoelements should be of little significance, especially as the loss of matter from open surfaces occurs at a rate which is 6—65 times slower than the equilibrium rate of evaporation. The values of the evaporation coefficient (0.15-0.16) found in our study show that the evaporation process is fairly complex. This is supported by thermodynamic calculations, which demonstrate that the evaporation is of a dissociative nature. [Pg.155]


See other pages where Equilibrium rate, surface pressure is mentioned: [Pg.297]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.154]   


SEARCH



Equilibrium pressure

Equilibrium rate, surface pressure attainment

Equilibrium surface pressure

Pressure rated

Rate-equilibrium

Surface pressure

Surface rate

© 2024 chempedia.info