Equilibrium, environmental fate models

This relationship is commonly used in environmental fate models to predict aqueous concentrations from sediment measurements by substituting the equilibrium expression for Kp and rearranging to solve for Cw ... 

Concentrations are useful for assessing trends, but do not adequately describe the fate of a contaminant in the environment. The rates of movement of contaminants from one compartment to another are necessary to assess fate, and to construct models that can predict fate under different environmental conditions. Models that describe contaminant transport and fate can range from simple equilibrium box models to highly complex dynamic models. For modelling PCB fate, accuracy and precision are limited by our ability to describe the processes involved, and the availability of actual field data for calibrating and validating the models. 

Many environmental fate processes, such as the degradation of pollutant chemicals, are not usefully modeled as equilibrium chemistry problems because the rate of the reaction is more important to quantify than the final composition of the system. For example, even though it may be known that at equilibrium a certain chemical will be fully degraded, it is crucial to know whether degradation will take seconds, years, or perhaps centuries. 

The fundamentals of mathematical models lie in the mass balance of the chemical in the environment, which is quantitatively expressed in terms of equilibrium and rate constants of the environmental fate processes. Incorporating these constants into a set of the mass balance equations, and solving these equations are complicated, so that computers are used frequently to reduce the time and cost. 

We have developed a number of multi-media models based on our (Higinal idea, and validated their predictability for evaluating environmental fate and exposure [2-9]. In our models, it is assumed that the environment consists of phases which are composed of several homogenous compartments. Also, the models assume that rates of intraphase transfer processes are faster than those of interphase transfer, transport and transformation processes (local equilibrium). 

Experimental measurements of solubility are influenced by many different factors, including the purity of the solute and solvent, presence of cosolvents, presence of salts, temperature, physical form of the undissolved solute, ionization state, and solution pH [18]. Consequently many different definitions of solubility are in common use in the published literature. Here we discuss the intrinsic aqueous solubility, Sg, which is defined as the concentration of the neutral form of the molecule in saturated aqueous solution at thermodynamic equilibrium at a given tanperature [18-20]. Intrinsic aqueous solubility is used to calculate dissolution rate and pH-dependent solubility in models such as the Noyes-Whimey equation [21] and the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation [22, 23], respectively. Prediction of the intrinsic aqueous solubility of bioactive molecules is of great importance in the biochemical sciences because it is a key determinant in the bioavailability of novel pharmaceuticals [1, 3, 24-26] and the environmental fate of potential pollutants [27, 28],... 

It is obvious to the user at this juncture that the subject of environmental chemical fate models enjoys many individual mass transfer processes. Besides this, the flux equations used for the various individual processes are often based on different concentrations such as Ca, Cw, Cs, and so on. Since concentration is a state variable in all EC models, the transport coefficients and concentrations must be compatible. Several concentrations are used because the easily measured ones are the logical mass-action rate drivers for these first-order kinetic mechanisms. Unfortunately, the result is a diverse set of flux equations containing various mechanism-oriented rate parameters and three or more media concentrations. Complications arise because the individual process parameters are based on a specific concentration or concentration difference. As argued in Chapter 3, the fiigacity approach is much simpler. Conversions to an alternative but equivalent media chemical concentration are performed using the appropriate thermodynamic equilibrium statement or equivalent phase partition coefficients. The process was demonstrated above in obtaining the overall deposition velocity Equation 4.9. In this regard, the key purpose of Table 4.2 is to provide the user with the appropriate transport rate constant compatible with the concentration chosen to express the flux. Eor each interface, there are two choices of concentration... 

The fate and distribution of 4-nitrophenol in different environmental compartments were assessed with a nonsteady-state equilibrium model (Yoshida et al. 1983). The model predicted the following distribution air, 0.0006% water, 94.6% soil, 0.95% sediment, 4.44% and biota, 0.00009%. Therefore, only a very small fraction of this compound released from various sources is expected to... 

The persistent organochlorine compounds, once released, will partition between environmental media according to their physical and chemical properties. Steady state equilibrium partitioning between these media has been considered as the simplest model simulating their behaviour. Over recent years, modelling the environmental partitioning and fate of these compounds has led to a broad... 

The first section (i.e., 1 in Table 2) serves as an introduction and defines the scope of the subject. As implied in the title, it is one of chemodynamics or the movement of chemicals. Chemical transport is the primary focus of the material. Critics have noted that production and degradation rates of chemical reactions are all but absent in the course syllabus. Environmental reaction is a very important but is also a very broad subject and its inclusion at even a basic technical level into EC would detract from the transport message. Two basic subjects are necessary for understanding transport. These are chemical equilibrium at interfaces and the fundamentals of transport phenomena. Highly condensed material on these two key subjects are presented in chapters 2 and 3. The last chapter, number 7, is on the fate and transport in water, air, and soil. These are the traditional subjects of environmental modeling which treat each of the three media separately and as isolated units from a multimedia perspective. Nevertheless, this approach is very appropriate for numerous EC applications. The section stresses the commonalities of fate and transport in the three media however, the brief coverage offered on each belies the importance of these respective intraphase transport topics. 

Level II includes the effects of advection and degradation reactions (represented as half-lives) in various media on the fate of chemicals. It describes a situation in which a chemical is discharged into the environment at a constant rate and achieves steady state (input equals output). The Level II model also assumes intermedia equilibrium, and thus rates of intermedia transport are again not considered. The environmental medium of discharge is therefore not important and the relative distribution of chemical among the various media is similar to Level I. 

The Level III model includes all the important fate and transport processes in a real environment and is one step more complex than Level n. As in the Level II model, the chemical is discharged at a constant rate into the environment to reach a steady state (at which input equals output). Unlike Level II, equilibrium between different media is not assumed and rates of chemical transfer by intermedia transport processes are defined. The individual discharges to all environmental media must be specified because fhe disfribufion of the chemical between media now depends on how the chemical enters the system. Depending on the properties of a chemical, the mode of entry can also significantly alter chemical persistence or residence time in the environment to viues that are quite different from Level II results. A series of 12 transport velocities control chemical transfer between the four primary environmental media (air, water, soil, and sediment). Equilibrium is assumed, however, within each medium. For example, suspended matter and fish are assumed to be at the same fugacity as water. 

---