Galerkin finite element equation

The simplicity gained by choosing identical weight and shape functions has made the standard Galerkin method the most widely used technique in the finite element solution of differential equations. Because of the centrality of this technique in the development of practical schemes for polymer flow problems, the entire procedure of the Galerkin finite element solution of a field problem is further elucidated in the following worked example. 

As an illustrative example we consider the Galerkin finite element solution of the following differential equation in domain Q, as shown in Figure 2.20. 

A Galerkin finite element (FE) program simultaneously solved the heat transfer PDE plus the material balance ordinary differential equation (Equation 9) (ODE). Typically, 400 equally spaced nodes were used to discretize half the cross-section. The program solved for the temperature and epoxide consumption at each node. 

Galerkin Finite Element Method In the finite element method, the domain is divided into elements and an expansion is made for the solution on each finite element. In the Galerkin finite element method an additional idea is introduced the Galerkin method is used to solve the equation. The Galerkin method is explained before the finite element basis set is introduced, using the equations for reaction and diffusion in a porous catalyst pellet. 

The Galerkin finite element method results when the Galerkin method is combined with a finite element trial function. The domain is divided into elements separated by nodes, as in the finite difference method. The solution is approximated by a linear (or sometimes quadratic) function of position within the element. These approximations are substituted into Eq. (3-80) to provide the Galerkin finite element equations. For example, with the grid shown in Fig. 3-48, a linear interpolation would be used between points x, and, vI+1. 

The set of partial differential equations developed for the simultaneous transfer of moisture, hear, and reactive chemicals under saturated/unsaturated soil conditions has been solved by the Galerkin finite element method. The chemical transport equations are formulated in terms of the total analytical concentration of each component species, and can be solved sequentially (Wu and Chieng, 1995). 

Using these definitions, the Galerkin finite element formulation for the stress equations will be... 

Parabolic Equations in One Dimension By combining the techniques applied to initial value problems and boundary value problems it is possible to easily solve parabolic equations in one dimension. The method is often called the method of lines. It is illustrated here using the finite difference method, but the Galerkin finite element method and the orthogonal collocation method can also be combined with initial value methods in similar ways. The analysis is done by example. 

In the early 1970s, the standard finite element approximations were based upon the Galerkin formulation of the method of weighted residuals. This technique did emerge as a powerful numerical procedure for solving elliptic boundary value problems [102, 75, 53, 84, 50, 89, 17, 35]. The Galerkin finite element methods are preferable for solving Laplace-, Poisson- and and diffusion equations because they do not require that a variational principle exists for the problem to be analyzed. However, the power of the method is still best utilized in systems for which a variational principle exists, and it... 

To illustrate the finite element method, the basic steps in the formulation of the standard Galerkin finite element method for solving a one-dimensional Poisson equation is outlined in the following. 

Selecting ( ) = / and substituting the approximate solution into the weak formulation, one obtains the local Galerkin finite element equation,... 

It is commonly accepted that the finite element methods offer the most rigorous numerical schemes for the simulation of fluid flow phenomena. The inherent flexibility of these schemes and their ability to cope with complicated geometries and boundary conditions can be used very effectively to solve the governing equations of complex flow regimes. In particular, the finite element simulation of steady, incompressible laminar flow is very well-established, and an extensive literature in this area is available. Galerkin finite element schemes based on different types of Lagrange elements are the most frequently used techniques in these simulations [8]. In flow domains with porous walls, however, more recent work... 

Since we introduced the Galerkin finite element approximations in space, the result (6.64) is an ordinary differential equation in the time-domain. 

---