Enzyme rhizosphere effect

In soil, the chances that any enzyme will retain its activity are very slim indeed, because inactivation can occur by denaturation, microbial degradation, and sorption (61,62), although it is possible that sorption may protect an enzyme from microbial degradation or chemical hydrolysis and retain its activity. The nature of most enzymes, particularly size and charge characteristics, is such that they would have very low mobility in soils, so that if a secreted enzyme is to have any effect, it must operate close to the point of secretion and its substrate must be able to diffuse to the enzyme. Secretory acid phosphatase was found to be produced in response to P-deficiency stress by epidermal cells of the main tap roots of white lupin and in the cell walls and intercellular spaces of lateral roots (63). Such apoplastic phosphatase is safe from soil but can be effective only when presented with soluble organophosphates, which are often present in the soil. solution (64). However, because the phosphatase activity in the rhizo-sphere originates from a number of sources (65), mostly microbial, and is much higher in the rhizosphere than in bulk soil (66), it seems curious that plants would have a need to secrete phosphatase at all. 

Mucilage has protective functions for the root meristem and improves root-soil contact by inclusion and aggregation of soil particles. It may also contribute to P desorption and to the exclusion of toxic elements (Al, Cd, Pb) by complexation with galacturonates, mainly in exchange with Ca2+ (Neumann and Romheld, 2002). Secreted enzymes contribute to the extracellular enzyme pool it has been shown that the activity of extracellular enzymes, such as phophatases, proteases, and aryl-sulfatases, exhibit more activity in the rhizosphere relative to the bulk soil and may have a dramatic effect on the cycling of nutrients such as P, N, and S (Badalucco and Nannipieri, 2007). 

Stimulation of active H+ extrusion from roots (Cesco, 1995 Pinton et al., 1997 Table 9.1) and transmembrane potential hyperpolarization (Slesak and Jurek, 1988) indicated the involvement of the PM H+-ATPase in the increased nutrient uptake generally observed in the presence of humic substances. Direct proof of an interaction between humic molecules and the PM H+-ATPase has been obtained by Vara-nini et al. (1993), who demonstrated that low-molecular-weight (<5kDa) humic molecules at concentrations compatible with those present in the rhizosphere can stimulate the phospho-hydrolytic activity of this enzyme in isolated PM vesicles (Table 9.1). Further proof of the action of humic molecules on PM FT-ATPase activity and on nutrient uptake mechanisms was obtained when studying the effect of these molecules on NO3 uptake. Transport of this nutrient is a substrate-inducible process and involves FT co-transport. At higher uptake rates, the levels and activity of root PM FT-ATPase increased (Santi et al., 1995). The short-term (4h) contact... 

The process giving rise to enhanced methylation, and hence emissions, from rice-planted and flooded soil was postulated by Muramatsu and Yoshida (1995). This process entails the desorption of iodine from the solid phase of the soil due to low and consequent predominance of G in the soil solution. in the rhizosphere then becomes biomethylated by the effect of enzymes produced by soil microorganisms or roots (e.g., methyl halide transferase (Wuosmaa and Hager, 1990)). The methyl iodide produced... 

---