Ensemble total energy

The microcanonical ensemble is a certain model for the repetition of experiments in every repetition, the system has exactly the same energy, Wand F but otherwise there is no experimental control over its microstate. Because the microcanonical ensemble distribution depends only on the total energy, which is a constant of motion, it is time independent and mean values calculated with it are also time independent. This is as it should be for an equilibrium system. Besides the ensemble average value (il), another coimnonly used average is the most probable value, which is the value of tS(p, q) that is possessed by the largest number of systems in the ensemble. The ensemble average and the most probable value are nearly equal if the mean square fluctuation is small, i.e. if... 

Consider two systems in thennal contact as discussed above. Let the system II (with volume and particles N ) correspond to a reservoir R which is much larger than the system I (with volume F and particles N) of interest. In order to find the canonical ensemble distribution one needs to obtain the probability that the system I is in a specific microstate v which has an energy E, . When the system is in this microstate, the reservoir will have the energy E = Ej.- E due to the constraint that the total energy of the isolated composite system H-II is fixed and denoted by Ej, but the reservoir can be in any one of the R( r possible states that the mechanics within the reservoir dictates. Given that the microstate of the system of... 

The canonical ensemble is the name given to an ensemble for constant temperature, number of particles and volume. For our purposes Jf can be considered the same as the total energy, (p r ), which equals the sum of the kinetic energy (jT(p )) of the system, which depends upon the momenta of the particles, and the potential energy (T (r )), which depends upon tlie positions. The factor N arises from the indistinguishability of the particles and the factor is required to ensure that the partition function is equal to the quantum mechanical result for a particle in a box. A short discussion of some of the key results of statistical mechanics is provided in Appendix 6.1 and further details can be found in standard textbooks. 

Figure 1 Convergence of the total energy and of the Hellmann-Feynman forces for ensembles of paramagnetic Fe atoms with 4 to 32 atoms. Part (a) shows the results of non-selfconsistent calculations performed with a fixed potential, part (b) the results of selfconsistent calculations. Full lines represent the RMM-DIIS (iterative diagonal-ization) results, broken lines the CGa (total-energy minimization) calculations. (4. text.

The probability of an ensemble distribution in classical statistics is maximized under the condition of given total energy in the ensemble, to yield the familiar Boltzmann distribution ... 

Fig. 2-19. Activity coefficient, y, and molar fraction, n/ N, of electrons in an electron ensemble in condensed phases n - electron concentration N = total energy state density available for electrons. [From Rosenberg, I960.]...

Once the boundary conditions have been implemented, the calculation of solution molecular dynamics proceeds in essentially the same manner as do vacuum calculations. While the total energy and volume in a microcanonical ensemble calculation remain constant, the temperature and pressure need not remain fixed. A variant of the periodic boundary condition calculation method keeps the system pressure constant by adjusting the box length of the primary box at each step by the amount necessary to keep the pressure calculated from the system second virial at a fixed value (46). Such a procedure may be necessary in simulations of processes which involve large volume changes or fluctuations. Techniques are also available, by coupling the system to a Brownian heat bath, for performing simulations directly in the canonical, or constant T,N, and V, ensemble (2,46). 

A direction for improving DPT lies in the development of a functional theory based on the one-particle reduced density matrix (1-RDM) D rather than on the one-electron density p. Like 2-RDM, the 1-RDM is a much simpler object than the A-particle wavefunction, but the ensemble A-representability conditions that have to be imposed on variations of are well known [1]. The existence [10] and properties [11] of the total energy functional of the 1-RDM are well established. Its development may be greatly aided by imposition of multiple constraints that are more strict and abundant than their DPT counterparts [12, 13]. 

To conclude our brief overview of ab initio MD, we note that the dynamics defined by Eq. (9.16) define a microcanonical ensemble. That is, trajectories defined by this Lagrangian will conserve the total energy of the system. Similar to the situation for classical MD simulations, it is often more useful to calculate trajectories associated with dynamics at a constant temperature. One common and effective way to do this is to add additional terms to the Lagrangian so that calculations can be done in the canonical ensemble (constant N, V, and T) using the Nose-Hoover thermostat introduced in Section 9.1.2. 

At first glance, the situation looks if anything worse than was true for AC. Now the ensemble averages are not over the total energies (already large numbers), but over exponentials of the total energies expressed in multiples of k Tl However, as long as the two systems A... 

In the general approach to classical statistical mechanics, each particle is considered to occupy a point in phase space, i.e., to have a definite position and momentum, at a given instant. The probability that the point corresponding to a particle will fall in any small volume of the phase space is taken proportional to die volume. The probability of a specific arrangement of points is proportional to the number of ways that the total ensemble of molecules could be permuted to achieve the arrangement. When this is done, and it is further required that the number of molecules and their total energy remain constant, one can obtain a description of the most probable distribution of the molecules in phase space. Tlie Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution law results. 

There are two basic approaches to the computer simulation of liquid crystals, the Monte Carlo method and the method known as molecular dynamics. We will first discuss the basis of the Monte Carlo method. As is the case with both these methods, a small number (of the order hundreds) of molecules is considered and the difficulties introduced by this restriction are, at least in part, removed by the use of artful boundary conditions which will be discussed below. This relatively small assembly of molecules is treated by a method based on the canonical partition function approach. That is to say, the energy which appears in the Boltzman factor is the total energy of the assembly and such factors are assumed summed over an ensemble of assemblies. The summation ranges over all the coordinates and momenta which describe the assemblies. As a classical approach is taken to the problem, the summation is replaced by an integration over all these coordinates though, in the final computation, a return to a summation has to be made. If one wishes to find the probable value of some particular physical quantity, A, which is a function of the coordinates just referred to, then statistical mechanics teaches that this quantity is given by... 

---