Enrichment selection pressure

In the first five cycles of in-vitro selection, very little (0.1-0.2%) of the total RNA reacted with biotin, predominantly because of the uncatalyzed background reaction. Several potential cofactors, for example Lewis acids, metal ions, a dipeptide compound, and a dipyridyl compound, were present in the reaction mixture. From cycle 6 onwards significant acceleration of the reaction was observed. As a consequence, in the following cycles the selection pressure was increased by shortening the reaction time and reducing the concentration of maleimide. Compared with the starting library a 6500-fold acceleration of the reaction was observed for the enriched pool after cycle 10. 

There are several options for the display of alien proteins using this technique. Proteins can be displayed on the envelope spike protein (Env), in which case selective pressure is placed on the population of viral particles before reinfection into fresh mammalian cells, much like phage display. So far, the potential of retroviral display for the generation and screening of eukaryotic expression libraries has only been demonstrated for small peptides. For example, avian leukemia virus (ALV) has been used to display a random peptide library (8-mer) and used to select specific sequences that bind to monoclonal antibodies that recognize short peptides (FLAG and HA tag antibodies). A lOOx enrichment of binding sequences was observed per round of selection.232... 

Eq. 1 allowed the plotting of rates of enrichment of resistance, with different scenarios of selection pressure, seed bank size, fitness, and initial mutation frequency (Fig. 1A). The values that could be plugged into the equation to generate the scenarios were based on a very limited data-base, mostly from corollary systems, such as heavy-metal tolerance. We knew too little about weed-herbicide interactions at that time to make precise estimates. With the experience of hindsight, we can see where the model was clearly correct, and where it needed modification. 

We previously (3) made calculations with Eq. 1, the counterpart of Eq. 4, for a number of parameter values, showing the enrichment of resistance when various levels of herbicides with different selection pressures axe applied annually. We also estimated the effects of periodically stopping herbicide use by setting a = 1 in calculating the resistance enrichment factor (Fig. IB). 

Returning to Eq. 9, we show in Fig. 4 the values of a that provide resistance stasis, as a function of the duration of the seedbank, for f0// = 0.2 (Fig. 4A) and for values of f0 that are so small compared to unity (/<,// <. 05) that /off essentially has no effect (Fig. 4B). Three possible rotation strategies are examined. We see that there can be cases where there is no enrichment at all for resistance. If the effective kill of 2,4-D in wheat is only 50-60% due to late weed germination, then under low fitness and a 1 1 enrichment there is no enrichment (Fig. 4). Stasis can even be obtained with selection pressures above 90% if there is a 2 or more year interval between the treatments with the herbicide. Stasis is impossible with very high selection pressure herbicides in usual rotational sequences. Long duration in the seed bank is actually a deterrent to stasis, as resistant seeds act as a buffer for longer periods (Fig. 4). 

For comparison, values of a are depicted in Fig. 5 that will just double resistance in three years if the 1-on 2-off strategy is employed. Note from Fig. 5 that at an intermediate value of 6, i.e., at an intermediate duration of the seeds in the seed bank, the doubling of resistance occurs very slowly at the lowest selection pressures. This means that if the frequency of resistance is 10 e, then it will take almost 60 years for resistant populations to predominate. A parallel phenomenon is observed in Fig. 6 where the enrichment factor Hlt2 (one on , two off ) for a = 10 (90% effective kill) has a maximum as a function of 6. 

Figure 3. Resistance stasis for no till agriculture. Values of selection pressure (a) and fitness in off years that will allow no enrichment for resistance (stasis), when fon = 1. This was drawn based on Eq. 12. The effective kills are based upon total lack of herbicidal effect on the resistant individuals.

Figure 4. Lack of enrichment for resistance under various selection pressures (a), under different rotation strategies, with different weed seed dynamics in the seed bank. The selection pressure is also shown as effective kill (the percent reduction in sensitive propagules over a whole season) with the assumption that the rare resistant individuals are totally unaffected by the herbicide. Here fon = 1 while f0/f takes a relatively large value (A) and a (B) value so small that / // has a negligible effect.

A typical affinity maturation project using yeast cell surface display is divided into several steps. First, the variable (VH and VL) domains of the parent hybridoma clone are identified. Second, the VH and VL genes are cloned into a display vector for expression as a scFv fragment on the cell surface. Third, the binding characteristics of the WT scFv are determined. Fourth, diverse variegated populations for selection are created by mutagenesis of the parent clone plasmid DNA. Fifth, clones with improved affinities are enriched from the mutant library after application of selective pressure. Sixth, selected clones are sequenced and... 

The affinity optimization process is divided into six major steps. Each step consists of a number of substeps that are required to complete the task. The first three steps construct and characterize the parental scFv clone that will be subsequently modified. Step four introduces random mutations to create a variegated population, and step five isolates clones with improved affinities from that library. Finally, step six characterizes the selected clones to determine whether adequate improvements have been achieved during the affinity optimization process. It should be noted that the degree of improvement depends on many factors, including but not limited to, the diversity of the library and extent of mutagenesis, selective pressure application, the degree of enrichment between rounds of selection and the overall magnitude of desired improvement. However, it will be readily appreciated that this entire process can be reiterated to achieve desired success. 

Fig. 2. The reiterative selection cycle. An initial library (106-107 complex) is constructed and induced for scFv expression. The library is allowed to bind to antigen under a selective pressure (e.g. antigen concentration, time, competitor) before clones with improved properties are isolated by FACS. Enriched clones are propagated and reinduced for scFv expression and the round of selection is repeated, using the enriched rather than the initial library. Individual clones can be analyzed and saved between rounds of selection.

In an artificial system, such as a directed evolution project, the amplification of variants can be fuUy separated from the selection step. If the selection pressure is applied to the pool comprising the entire library of protein variants, we call this strategy selection by physical enrichment. This approach is most straightforward if the improved fitness of variants confers higher binding affinities to a target molecule. 

The selection started with an RNA library of -2 x 10 sequences of 160 nucleotide length." After tethering the RNA to anthracene via long flexible PEG chains, this library was allowed to react for with an excess of biotinylated maleimide. Biotinylated RNA was recovered using immobilized strepavidin, and selection pressure was gradually increased by reducing reaction time and maleimide concentration. After 10 iterations of selection and amplification, the enriched library showed -6,500-fold rate acceleration, compared to the starting library. Individual members of this enriched library were sequenced and assayed for activity. 

Intercalators could have also provided selective pressure toward the formation of a more uniform backbone. As discussed above, non-enzymatic template directed ligation reactions produce a mixture of 2, 5 and 3, 5 linkages, often with enrichment in 2, 5 linkages (65). Recent work in our laboratory has demonstrated that proflavine has a 25-fold higher affinity for 2, 5 -linked versus 3, 5 -linked RNA (66). However, other intercalators, such as ethidium bromide, favor the 3, 5 -linked RNA duplexes (66). It can therefore be postulated that if a given midwife molecule has a preferential association with a 3, 5 -linked RNA... 

---