Energy expression single-determinant form

DFT methods also use a wave function, but this wave function serves merely to obtain the electron density of the molecule, and it is from the density that the energy and all molecular properties are subsequently derived. Even though the auxiliary wave function in DFT has a single determinant form, the energy expression extracted from it incorporates static as well as dynamic electron correlation. Consequently, the DFT procedure is faster than the ab initio procedmes its time consumption scales like Hartree-Fock theory, but its accuracy is much better, and is sometimes competitive even with CASPT2. As such, DFT can treat systems of up to c. 100 or more atoms and obtain results with decent accuracy for an entire potential energy surface of an enzymatic reaction. 

When the single determinant many-electron functions are constructed from canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals, the excited functions, and , are doubly excited with respect to the reference function . The second term in the third order energy expression cancels diagonal components for which p = v in the first term. The principal term in the fourth order energy expression has the form... 

Ideally, one would like to smdy excited stales and ground states using wave functions of equivalent quality. Ground-state wave functions can very often be expressed in terms of a single Slater determinant formed from variationally optimized MOs, with possible accounting for electron correlation effects taken thereafter (or, in the case of DFT, the optimized orbitals that intrinsically include electron correlation effects are use in the energy functional). Such orbitals are determined in the SCF procedure. 

This is exactly the same as the expression for the kinetic energy of a single determinant of MOs Xi- If. however, the expansion is restricted to only n terms the eoMct kinetic energy of a system of interacting electrons cannot be expressed in this way the best that we can hope for is to be able to choose this restricted expansion in such a way that, perhaps, the majority of the kinetic energy may be computed in this way. Because, if it can, we have an expansion for the electron density of a flexible form (identical to the familiar single-determinant MO expression) from which we can easily compute ... 

Section 2.3 is concerned with the form of the one- and two-electron operators of quantum chemistry and the rules for evaluating matrix elements of these operators between Slater determinants. The conversion of expressions for matrix elements involving spin orbitals to expressions involving spatial orbitals is discussed. Finally, we describe a mnemonic device for obtaining the expression for the energy of any single determinant. 

In the simplest model case where the Cl expansion comprises only a single determinant, which defines the Hartree-Fock approximation, reduces the energy expression to a more compact form. 

As mentioned in Sect. 2, the exchange-overlap energy depends on the nature of the spin coupling of the interacting molecules [18, 19]. For closed-shell molecules the resultant total spin is zero, and the first-order contribution to the exchange-overlap component of the interaction can be expressed in closed form if Atp is approximated as a single determinant of Hartree-Fock spin-orbitals of the individual molecules [48-50]. 

Perturbation methods are size consistent in other words, they lead to total energies that scale linearly with the size of the system. However, they have drawbacks. First, their energies are not upper bounds to the exact energy of the system (because the energy expression is not of the expectation value form). Second, the wavefunction is expressed in terms of corrections to a presumed dominant reference function of a single determinant. Therefore, when Hartree-Fock theory presents a major problem, MP2 may not be an appropriate method of rectification. For further discussion of post-Hartree-Fock methods, see, for example, a recent, excellent review by Bartlett and Stanton. 

Although they did not obtain a closed-form analytic expression for the three-dimensional case, they dealt with a trasformed one-matrix for the single Slater determinant constructed from plane waves, and rewrote the energy in terms of this transformed matrix. The conditions on the transformation were not imposed through the Jacobian but rather through the equations ... 

The selection rules governing photon absorption in solids determine the oscillator strength of the optical transition and its energy dependence. The expressions obtained for the imaginary component of the optical dielectric constant depend on whether the transition is allowed in the dipole approximation and on whether the simultaneous absorption or emission of a phonon is involved. In pure single-crystal materials, the absorption coefficient can be described conveniently by relationships that take the general form [4]... 

---