Energy bands, relation photoemission

The magnitude of the injection barrier is open to conjecture. Meanwhile there is consensus that energy barriers can deviate significantly from the values estimated from vacuum values of the work-function of the electrode and from the center of the hole and electron transporting states, respectively. The reason is related to the possible formation of interfacial dipole layers that are specific for the kind of material. Photoelectron spectroscopy indicates that injection barriers can differ by more than 1 eV from values that assume vacuum level alignment [176, 177]. Photoemission studies can also delineate band bending close to the interface [178]. 

Fig. 30. Diagram of transitions related to photoemission into solution 1—photoexcitation of an electron and photoemission, 2—thermalization of the photoemitted electron in the solution, 3—solvation of the thermalized electron, and 4—trapping of the solvated electron by acceptor A in the solution. de)oc is the lower edge of the band of delocalized states in the solution, solv is the energy level of the solvated electron, and EA is the acceptor energy level.

First, the level F, whose position determines the thermodynamic work function wx, is located in the case of semiconductors in the forbidden band. The energy characteristics of a semiconductor-electrolyte interface under photoemission are presented in Fig. 31, which shows, in particular, that the threshold frequency is given by the relation tiw0 = Eg + where % is the difference between the potential energy level of a delocalized electron outside... 

Figure 2. Dispersion relation for uppermost energy levels for the isx(k), Ey k) bands discussed in the text for a given k = (k ky). The energy surface has fourfold symmetry about the origin. The result is compared with the photoemission data of Shen et al [7] also shown in the lower part of the figure.

The lifetime of the simplest quasiparticle, i.e. a hole in a surface band, can be obtained experimentally from the width of the corresponding peak in ARPES, since the spectral linewidth of a quasiparticle excitation in the energy space is inversely related to its lifetime. The lower panel of Fig. 4 shows the widths of the photoemission peaks at normal emission corresponding to the L-gap surface states. It can be shown [45] that for a 2D band such as these, the widths reflect the initial state (hole) lifetime. For these surface states the lifetime ranges from 30 to 110 femtoseconds (ImeV corresponds to a lifetime of 0.67 x 10 12s). 

Surface sensitivity is an intrinsic property of photoemission measurements. The incident light penetrates far into the solid, but the escape depth of excited electrons is very short (Fig. 5), although there are local variations related to direction-dependent band structure effects. Surface sensitivity can be further enhanced by appropriate choice of experimental parameters such as photon energy, angles of incidence and emission, etc., which take advantage of selection rules favouring surface processes. 

A comparison between the Si 2p spectra of the different Si(100)2xl-AM surfaces is presented in Fig. 10. The intensity of the surface component S suggests that it corresponds to emission from the whole uppermost Si layer for Na and K interfaces, while it seems to correspond to half a monolayer for the Rb and Cs interfaces. The values of the S energy splitting with respect to the bulk is presented in Table 9 for different AM. Theoretical calculations predict the formation of symmetric dimers after AM adsorption. This conclusion was supported from the corresponding Si 2p core levels from Na and K interfaces. On the contrary, the Si 2p core levels obtained for Rb and Cs interfaces do not differ much flum those of the clean surface, which suggests a weaker modification of the surface by the adsotbed AM atoms, and the Si dimers may remain asymmetric in this case. The difference in the modification on the Si dimers by the different AM atoms must be related to the Si-AM or AM-AM interactioa A concomitant surface band gap decrease when the size of the AM atom increases has also been detected by inverse photoemission [93Joh]. 

The internal photoelectric effect, just as infrared radiation, was also first observed in the 19th century, when certain minerals such as selenium or lead sulfide were found to increase their electrical conductivity in the presence of light. These photoconductors depend upon the photoexcitation of bound electrons and/or holes into the conduction and/or valence bands of the material. Then, at the turn of the century, external photoemission was discovered in vacuum diodes. As first explained by Einstein, the photoelectric effect was found to have a threshold wavelength determined by the relation hv = he lk>E, where E is the energy required for the electron to exit the material. In the case of a semiconductor, the excitation energy, E, is that of the gap between the valence and conduction bands or the ionization energy of an impurity in the material. The electronic detector family has two main branches, the first being the vacuum photodiode and its more useful... 

---