Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Empirical models, nonlinear relationships

In contrast to the mechanistic models, empirical models make no a priori assumptions about the importance of single descriptors and the type of relationship (e.g., linear or nonlinear) between the input and the observed data. Still, many empirical models either employed descriptors that had been previously found to be important or the descriptors in the final model were replaced by such that could be easily interpreted from a mechanistic point of view. [Pg.474]

Artificial neural networks are able to derive empirical models from a collection of experimental data. This applies in particular to complex, nonlinear relationships between input and output data. [Pg.103]

Franke developed another empirical model to bridge the gap between so many linear relationships and a nonlinear model (Figure 12). He considered binding of ligands at a hydrophobic protein surface of limited size as being responsible for nonlinear lipophilicity-activity relationships and formulated two equations, one for the linear left side (eq. 82) and the other one for the right side, the nonlinear part (eq. 83 log P = critical log P value, where the linear relationship changes to a nonlinear one) [435]. [Pg.69]

The empirical current-duration relationship is in somewhat better accordance with the hyperbolic model than the exponential, but the exponential model is directly derived from the electric circuit model with a current source supplying an ideal resistor and capacitor in parallel. The empirical current-duration relationship is different for myelinated and naked axons. Also, it must be remembered that the excitation process is nonlinear and not easily modeled with ideal electronic components. [Pg.138]

Experimental evidence obtained from the literature and from current research has been cited to demonstrate that densification processes are responsive to at least five independent experimental variables, temperature, remnant porosity, remnant surface area, applied stress, and the concentration of non-thermodynamic defects, which represent annealable excess internal energy. An empirical model for densification kinetics incorporating these variables has been proposed which provides for nonlinear dependences of densification rate upon porosity and total stress. The proposed relationship is com-... [Pg.404]

Neural nets can also be used for modeling physical systems whose behavior is poorly understood, as an alternative to nonlinear statistical techniques, eg, to develop empirical relationships between independent and dependent variables using large amounts of raw data. [Pg.540]

The most, comprehensive review of quantitative structure-pharmacokinetics relationships [452] tabulates about 100 equations, including absorption, distribution, protein binding, elimination, and metabolism of drugs. Since many of these equations and those included in other reviews e.g. [472, 761]) have been derived before appropriate mathematical models for nonlinear lipophilicity-activity relationships (chapter 4.4) and for the correct consideration of the dissociation and ionization of acids and bases (chapter 4.5, especially eqs. 107—110) were available, some of the older results should be recalculated by using the theoretical models (chapters 4.4 and 4.5) instead of the empirical ones. [Pg.129]

Most work on the development of dynamic process models has been empirical this work is usually referred to as process identification. As mentioned earlier, two classes of empirical identification techniques are available one uses deterministic (step, pulse, etc.) functions, the other stochastic (random) identification functions. With either technique, the process is perturbed and the resulting variations of the response are measured. The relationship between the perturbing variable and the response is expressed as a transfer function. This function is the process model. Empirical identification of process models by the deterministic method has been reported by various workers [55-58]. A drawback of this method is the difficulty in obtaining a measurable response while restricting the process to a linear response (small perturbation). If the perturbation is large, the process response will be nonlinear and the representations of the process with a linear process model will be inaccurate. [Pg.142]

Moreover, the relationships making part of the Kowalska model (e.g., Eqs. 41-44) are—contrary to the relationships offered by the other approaches discussed in this chapter—more flexible and hence more accurate, due to the fact that they (i) strongly depend on the chemical nature of the mixed mobile phases, and (ii) couple together the coefficient with the mobile phase composition in a manner which is nonlinear by principle (the important feature that does not always occur with the remaining models of solute retention, no matter how much this nonlinearity was closer to the empirical practice of chromatography than the assumed straight-line simplifications). Thus it seems reasonable to expect that Eqs. 41-44 can be employed in the interpretational methods of selectivity optimization at least as successfully, as any other already established retention model, and occasionally even significantly better than them. [Pg.76]

The most commonly used model for understanding the relationship between the hyperpolarizability P and molecular structure is the two-state model (Oudar and Chemla, 1977). This model provides only a rough description but it allows a qualitative understanding of the nonlinear optical properties of molecules. For push-pull compounds with electron donors and acceptors, the P value depends mainly on the intramolecular polarization, the oscillator strength, and the excited state of the material (Allis and Spencer, 2001). There are three different possibilities for a refinement of the two-state model semi-empirical, ab initio and density functional theory methods (Li et al., 1992 Kanis et al., 1994 Kurtz and Dudis, 1998). [Pg.302]

Figure 6.1.3 is useful in showing thow the (solids free) gas friction factor in conical- and cylindrical-bodied cyclones varies with cyclone Reynolds number and relative wall roughness, that is fair = f kg/R,Rep). Even so, if we wish to incorporate it into a cyclone computer model, we need to express this functional relationship in equation form. Although the dependency between the variables shown in Fig. 6.1.3 is very nonlinear, and difficult to fit , the authors have developed a set of equations that fit the entire range of fair, kg/R and Rep values shown in Fig. 6.1.3 for both conical- and cylindrical-bodied cyclones. These empirical equations have a maximum error of about 20 to 22% relative to the data points shown in Fig. 6.1.3. This error decreases, of course, with increasing solids loading. The gas phase friction factors computed with the empirical curve fits shown below have proven sufficiently accurate for most design applications. Figure 6.1.3 is useful in showing thow the (solids free) gas friction factor in conical- and cylindrical-bodied cyclones varies with cyclone Reynolds number and relative wall roughness, that is fair = f kg/R,Rep). Even so, if we wish to incorporate it into a cyclone computer model, we need to express this functional relationship in equation form. Although the dependency between the variables shown in Fig. 6.1.3 is very nonlinear, and difficult to fit , the authors have developed a set of equations that fit the entire range of fair, kg/R and Rep values shown in Fig. 6.1.3 for both conical- and cylindrical-bodied cyclones. These empirical equations have a maximum error of about 20 to 22% relative to the data points shown in Fig. 6.1.3. This error decreases, of course, with increasing solids loading. The gas phase friction factors computed with the empirical curve fits shown below have proven sufficiently accurate for most design applications.
In the first study by Tan et al. in order to obtain a mathematical relationship between the structural components of the nonsolvent additives and the gas performance, each nonsolvent additive was split into structural components such as -CH3, -CH2-, =CH- and = C = groups. Table 20 shows the grouping of all the nonsolvent additives. Several linear polynomial 1st and 2nd order equations as well as nonlinear polynomial equations were attempted to derive an empirical correlation between the number of structural components and gas permeation data. A correlation could only be determined for the CO2/CH4 permeance ratio. This model is... [Pg.278]


See other pages where Empirical models, nonlinear relationships is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.2530]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.1916]    [Pg.498]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Empirical modeling

Empirical models

Empirical models, nonlinear

Empirical relationship

Nonlinear model

Nonlinear modeling

© 2024 chempedia.info