Enamel surface, elemental composition

From a materials perspective there are two possible reasons why dental enamel shows the large variations in mechanical properties shown in figure 1 firstly, chemical variations in apatite composition and, secondly, changes in enamel structure with position from the occlusal surface to the EDJ. The chemical composition of enamel can be examined with a lateral resolution of 1-10 pm with electron microprobe analysis. Enamel structure can be obtained with SEM. To perform an accurate microprobe analysis, natural and synthetic minerals are used as standards to calibrate the instrument. This is fairly routine for geologists and earth scientists who are able to obtain chemical compositions with an accuracy of <0.1% for a wide range of elements simultaneously (including Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy, Er, Yb, Hf, Ta, Pb, Th, U, F and Cl). In enamel only a few of these (Na, Mg, Al, P, K, Ca, Ti, Cl and F) are above the detection limit. The Ti is likely to be an impurity or contaminant rather than a constituent of enamel. This technique does not work for lighter elements such as C, S, O and N which may be present in enamel. 

Table A3.2 Major Elemental Composition of Surface and Bulk Dental Enamel ...

---