Electrons approximation and

It should be stated that eqs. (3) through (21) are general in that they do not require a rr-electron approximation and do not represent directly any specific computational method. In the rr-electron approach with Pople s approximations, the F matrix elements become those below. 

The reactivities of isomeric thienothiophenes calculated in n -electron approximation by the PPP method, and those calculated considering all valence electrons, show reasonable agreement. It should be noted, however, that the choice of parameters in PPP calculations is somewhat arbitrary, especially for heavy atoms (e.g., sulfur). This may lead to a discrepancy between theoretical (in 7r-electron approximation) and experimental estimation of reactivities. For example, Clark applied the semiempirical method PPP SCF MO to calculate the reactivities of different positions in thienothiophenes 1—3, thiophene, and naphthalene from the localization energy values and found the following order of decreasing reactivity for electrophilic substitution thieno[3,4-b]-thiophene (3) > thieno[2,3-Z>]thiophene (I) > thieno [3,2-b]thiophene... 

This is the one-electron approximation, also called the independent electron approximation and hence the le superscript, where a Hamiltonian Hq of an A e-electron system can be expressed as the sum of Ne one-electron Hamiltonians and the Schrodinger equation to be solved becomes ... 

In these integrals the additional superscript it indicates that we are now within the framework of the 7r-electron approximation and that essentially H has been replaced by Ht (see eqn (10-4.1)) and consequently (see eqn (10-3.4)) by... 

The arrival of ab initio programs based on Gaussian-type orbitals and more powerful computers reduced all these developments to historical souvenirs. It should be emphasized, however, that Sandorfy s work constituted the first attempt to go beyond the 7t-electron approximation, and the first molecular orbital treatment of polyatomic molecules that took into account all valence electrons without using group orbitals. 

The origin of these effects has been debated. One possibility is the Peierls instability [57], which is discussed elsewhere in this book In a one-dimensional system with a half-filled band and electron-photon coupling, the total energy is decreased by relaxing the atomic positions so that the unit cell is doubled and a gap opens in the conduction band at the Brillouin zone boundary. However, this is again within an independent electron approximation, and electron correlations should not be neglected. They certainly are important in polyenes, and the fact that the lowest-lying excited state in polyenes is a totally symmetric (Ag) state instead of an antisymmetric (Bu) state, as expected from independent electron models, is a consequence... 

PPP) method, and there are a large number of reviews based on this method.3 5 The indispensable role of the PPP method for practical molecular modeling is not likely to decrease in photochemistry, not only because it is a very simple method, but also because it takes electron correlation into account by taking advantage of the subtle balance between the jt-electron approximation and the ykk=Ip — EA approximation. ... 

Centrifugal barriers have a profound effect on the physics of many-electron atoms, especially as regards subvalence and inner shell spectra. One aspect not discussed above is how energy degeneracies arising from orbital collapse can lead to breakdown of the independent electron approximation and the appearance of multiply excited states. Similarly, we have not discussed multiple ionisation (the ejection of several electrons by a single photon) enhanced by a giant resonance. Both issues will be considered in chapter 7. 

In Chapter 7 we saw that it is not possible to obtain exact solutions of the Schrodinger equation for many-electron atoms, even within the one-electron approximation, and the same applies to molecules. For these systems it is necessary to use approximate solutions, which are based on chemical insight and chosen for mathematical convenience. 

Conduction electrons in broad bands of s- and p-like character contribute to all three quantities (sp). The Landau orbital diamagnetism (L) of these electrons is frequently considered only in the free-electron approximation, and taken care of by introducing a factor of two thirds in front of jp, whilst represents only the core diamagnetism. More localized non-s-like electrons in narrow bands give temperature-dependent contributions. In addition to the spin part (d) of the susceptibility, which is noticeable at the nucleus via core polarization (and finally Fermi-contact interaction) or via dipolar interaction (dip), van Vleck type induced orbital contributions of the magnetic susceptibility lead to orbital (orb) contributions of K and l/T, and eventually also to quadrupolar contributions (Q) of l/Ti- In this chapter we will use the symbol a, (instead ofH , ) for the hyperfne coupling constant(s) (with units of Oep. or Oe/electron) in the equation... 

In the periodic Anderson model state of the electrons of the crystal containing impurities in the 7i-electron approximation and the nearest neighbor approximation is described by the effective Hamiltonian, having the following standard form [5] ... 

For the monomer units one can directly compare values of 2nd hyperpolarizability obtained in a -electron approximation and ab inito methods with augmented basis set, 6-31 -l-+G(d,p). We carried out calculations for monomer units of considered (in the Sect. 3.3.3.3) polyfulvenes at MP2 level of theory. Results are presented in the Table 3.1. 

With respect to optical properties, most calculations are limited to the independent-electron approximation and the imaginary part of the dielectric function ( 2) given by (Ossicini et al. 2003)... 

A very different ansatz apphes when the opposite limit holds, i. e. when the kinetic-energy gain due to spreading an electron over both atoms dominates the mutual electron repulsions. The molecular-orbital theory describes the two electrons within the independent electron approximation and the bonding molecular orbital of an H2 molecule is... 

Problem 2.2. The electronic surface states are shown in Fig. 2.26 by dashed lines. The parabolic shape of the upper surface band implies that it is well described by the nearly-free electron approximation and hence this state is classified as a Shockley state. The lower surface state has the character of a surface resonance in the region where it intersects the electronic bulk band. An electronic transition between the surface states is possible if the upper state is unoccupied, i.e., it is located above the Fermi level. The minimum energy of such a transition is about 1.8 eV. 

The most popular approximation, which allows to approach the solution of the problem, is the one-electron approach where electrons, according to the Pauli principle, are distributed over the system of levels in some effective potential of nuclei and electrons (in the self-consistent field, SCF). This distribution is named the electronic configuration. There are different variants of the one-electron approximation, and the range of their applicability depends on intemuclear distances. The method of molecular orbitals (MO) is the most popular and highly developed method to present time. In this method, molecular orbitals are arranged as a linear combination (LC) of atomic orbitals (AO) fix>m which the method is named MO LCAO. 

For a disordered Hamiltonian it is natural to ask what the nature of the wave functions is. In particular, do they extend throughout the solid or are they localized It is important to note that this is a meaningful question even in the independent-electron approximation and indeed all of this section is in that spirit. What do we mean by localization Thouless has listed six definitions which have been used, with the statement that they are probably equivalent. Three of these are given below. 

For a further description, we use the single-electron approximation and confine a single electron for simplicity in a one-dimensional box of length L. We set the potential energy within the box to zero, while it is infinite at the walls of the box. 

---