Electronic structure Coulomb interactions

Another interesting situation arises in the ST of excitons in which the electron and hole are spatially separated and are localized on different filaments (polymers or quantum wires) or different planes (or quantum wells). In such structures the electron-hole Coulomb interaction changes when these filaments or planes are deformed. As a result a strong exciton-phonon interaction may exist, even if the individual quasiparticles (electron and hole) have very small interaction with the phonons. The theory of ST of this type of excitations may be found in Ref. (44). 

C) All mean-field models of electronic. structure require large corrections. Essentially all ab initio quantum chemistry approaches introduce a mean field potential F that embodies the average interactions among the electrons. The difference between the mean-field potential and the true Coulombic potential is temied [20] the "fluctuationpotentiar. The solutions Ef, to the true electronic... 

The original FMM has been refined by adjusting the accuracy of the multipole expansion as a function of the distance between boxes, producing the very Fast Multipole Moment (vFMM) method. Both of these have been generalized tc continuous charge distributions, as is required for calculating the Coulomb interactioi between electrons in a quantum description. The use of FMM methods in electronic structure calculations enables the Coulomb part of the electron-electron interaction h be calculated with a computational effort which depends linearly on the number of basi functions, once the system becomes sufficiently large. 

What Do We Need to Know Already This chapter assumes that we know about atomic structure and electron configurations (Chapter 1), the basic features of energy, and the nature of the Coulomb interaction between charges (Section A). It is also helpful to be familiar with the nomenclature of compounds (Section D) and oxidation numbers (Section K). 

In the DC-biased structures considered here, the dynamics are dominated by electronic states in the conduction band [1]. A simplified version of the theory assumes that the excitation occurs only at zone center. This reduces the problem to an n-level system (where n is approximately equal to the number of wells in the structure), which can be solved using conventional first-order perturbation theory and wave-packet methods. A more advanced version of the theory includes all of the hole states and electron states subsumed by the bandwidth of the excitation laser, as well as the perpendicular k states. In this case, a density-matrix picture must be used, which requires a solution of the time-dependent Liouville equation. Substituting the Hamiltonian into the Liouville equation leads to a modified version of the optical Bloch equations [13,15]. These equations can be solved readily, if the k states are not coupled (i.e., in the absence of Coulomb interactions). 

After cocondensation of SiO (1226 cm 1) with alkali metal atoms like Na or K, new bands are detected at 1014 cm 1 (Na) or 1025 cm 1 (K). They can only be attributed to an SiO" anion because of the red shift of the SiO stretching vibration (with respect to that of uncoordinated SiO) and because of different isotopic splittings (28/29/30SiO, Si16/180) [21]. The formation of an ionic species M+(SiO) (M = Na, K) is in line with the results of quantum chemical calculations for the SiO anion (SiO d = 1.49 A, SiO" d = 1.55 A, "electron affinity" SiO + e + 1.06 eV —> SiO") [20]. Taking simple Coulomb interactions into consideration this species is very likely to have a strongly bent structure. The same situation occurs in gaseous NaCN (<(NaNC) = 81.2°) [22],... 

Further, if the wave function depends also on the electron spins, spin variables over all electrons should also be integrated we will see this below, in the calculation of exchange hole. The expression in the curly brackets above is exactly the XC hole PxCM(r, r ) defined in Equation 7.17. A comparison with Equation 7.19a shows that adding the hole to the density is similar to subtracting the density of one electron p(r )/N from it. The hole thus represents a deficit of one electron from the density. This is easily verified by integrating p tM(V, r ) over the volume dr, which gives a value of — 1. However, the structure of the hole is not simple and this is because of the motion of different electrons correlated due to the Pauli exclusion principle and the Coulomb interaction between them. Finally we note that the product p(r)p cM(r, r ) is symmetric with respect to an exchange in the variables... 

The ion-water interactions are very strong Coulomb forces. As the hydrated ion approaches the solution/metal interface, the ion could be adsorbed on the metal surface. This adsorption may be accompanied by a partial loss of coordination shell water molecules, or the ion could keep its coordination shell upon adsorption. The behavior will be determined by the competition between the ion-water interactions and the ion-metal interactions. In some cases, a partial eharge transfer between the ion and the metal results in a strong bond, and we term this process chemisorption, in contrast to physisorption, which is much weaker and does not result in substantial modification of the ion s electronic structure. In some cases, one of the coordination shell molecules may be an adsorbed water molecule. hi this case, the ion does not lose part of the coordination shell, but some reorganization of the coordination shell molecules may occur in order to satisfy the constraint imposed by the metal surface, especially when it is charged. 

So far we have assumed that the electronic structure of the crystal consists of one band derived, in our approximation, from a single atomic state. In general, this will not be a realistic picture. The metals, for example, have a complicated system of overlapping bands derived, in our approximation, from several atomic states. This means that more than one atomic orbital has to be associated with each crystal atom. When this is done, it turns out that even the equations for the one-dimensional crystal cannot be solved directly. However, the mathematical technique developed by Baldock (2) and Koster and Slater (S) can be applied (8) and a formal solution obtained. Even so, the question of the existence of otherwise of surface states in real crystals is diflBcult to answer from theoretical considerations. For the simplest metals, i.e., the alkali metals, for which a one-band model is a fair approximation, the problem is still difficult. The nature of the difficulty can be seen within the framework of our simple model. In the first place, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian operator is really different for each electron. If we overlook this complication and use some sort of mean value for this operator, the operator still contains terms representing the interaction of the considered electron with all other electrons in the crystal. The Coulomb part of this interaction acts in such a way as to reduce the effect of the perturbation introduced by the existence of a free surface. A self-consistent calculation is therefore essential, and the various parameters in our theory would have to be chosen in conformity with the results of such a calculation. 

---