Electronic coupling transfer rate

At higher current densities, the primary electron transfer rate is usually no longer limiting instead, limitations arise tluough the slow transport of reactants from the solution to the electrode surface or, conversely, the slow transport of the product away from the electrode (diffusion overpotential) or tluough the inability of chemical reactions coupled to the electron transfer step to keep pace (reaction overpotential). 

Early studies showed tliat tire rates of ET are limited by solvation rates for certain barrierless electron transfer reactions. However, more recent studies showed tliat electron-transfer rates can far exceed tire rates of diffusional solvation, which indicate critical roles for intramolecular (high frequency) vibrational mode couplings and inertial solvation. The interiDlay between inter- and intramolecular degrees of freedom is particularly significant in tire Marcus inverted regime [45] (figure C3.2.12)). 

In the strong-coupling limit at high temperatures the electron transfer rate constant is given by the Marcus formula [Marcus 1964]... 

EPR studies on electron transfer systems where neighboring centers are coupled by spin-spin interactions can yield useful data for analyzing the electron transfer kinetics. In the framework of the Condon approximation, the electron transfer rate constant predicted by electron transfer theories can be expressed as the product of an electronic factor Tab by a nuclear factor that depends explicitly on temperature (258). On the one hand, since iron-sulfur clusters are spatially extended redox centers, the electronic factor strongly depends on how the various sites of the cluster are affected by the variation in the electronic structure between the oxidized and reduced forms. Theoret-... 

Figure 23. Arrhenius plot of the electron transfer rate. The electronic coupling strength is TIad = 0.0001 a.u. Solid line-Bixon-Jortner perturbation theory Ref. [109]. FuU-circle present results of Eq. (26 ). Dashed line-results of Marcus s high temperature theory [Eq.(129)]. Taken from Ref. [28].

Figure 25. Electron-transfer rate the electronic coupling strength at T = 500 K for the asymmetric reaction (AG = —3ffl2, oh = 749 cm ). Solid line-present full dimensional results with use of the ZN formulas. Dotted line-full dimensional results obtained from the Bixon-Jortner formula. Filled dotts-effective ID results of the quantum mechanical flux-flux correlation function. Dashed line-effective ID results with use of the ZN formulas. Taken from Ref. [28].

According to the Marcus theory [9], the electron transfer rate depends upon the reaction enthalpy (AG), the electronic coupling (V) and the reorganization energy (A). By changing the electron donor and the bridge we measured the influence of these parameters on the charge transfer rate. The re-... 

The influence of the electronic coupling on the electron transfer rate was determined by changing the length of the (A T)n bridge. As expected, the rate decreased as the number n of the A T base pairs between electron donor and electron acceptor increased [4, 7]. But, surprisingly, the exponential correlation of Eq. (1) between the rate kEr and the distance is not valid for short distances. The plots in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show that at 6 A the electron transfer rate /cEt is much faster than expected [4, 7]. 

Outer-sphere electron transfer reactions involving the [Co(NH3)6]3+/2+ couple have been thoroughly studied. A corrected [Co(NH3)6]3+/2+ self-exchange electron transfer rate (8 x 10-6M-1s-1 for the triflate salt) has also been reported,588 which is considerably faster than an earlier report. A variety of [Co(NH3)g]3+/2+ electron transfer cross reactions with simple coordination compounds,589 organic radicals,590,591 metalloproteins,592 and positronium particles (electron/ positron pairs)593 as redox partners have been reported. 

Very few references are available on the determination of the rate constant for each step of electron charge transfer in the reaction M2+ + 2e -> M(s), i.e., M2+ + e -> M+, M+ + c" -> M(s). Earlier studies are mostly related to two-electron charge transfer reactions either at M2+/Hg(dme), M2+/metal amalgam, or redox couple/Pt interfaces. Even in these studies, the kinetic parameters have been determined assuming that one of the two steps of the reaction is much slower and is in overall control of the rate of reaction in both... 

When the electron coupling between locally excited-state (LE) and charge transfer state (CT) is weak, the electron transfer rate kcl can be expressed as (7)... 

In this section, we switch gears slightly to address another contemporary topic, solvation dynamics coupled into the ESPT reaction. One relevant, important issue of current interest is the ESPT coupled excited-state charge transfer (ESCT) reaction. Seminal theoretical approaches applied by Hynes and coworkers revealed the key features, with descriptions of dynamics and electronic structures of non-adiabatic [119, 120] and adiabatic [121-123] proton transfer reactions. The most recent theoretical advancement has incorporated both solvent reorganization and proton tunneling and made the framework similar to electron transfer reaction, [119-126] such that the proton transfer rate kpt can be categorized into two regimes (a) For nonadiabatic limit [120] ... 

Moreover, it has been demonstrated that CNTs promote the direct electrochemistry of enzymes. Dong and coworkers have reported the direct electrochemistry of microperoxidase 11 (MP-11) using CNT-modified GC electrodes [101] and layer-by-layer self-assembled films of chitosan and CNTs [102], The immobilized MP-11 has retained its bioelectrocatalytic activity for the reduction of H202 and 02, which can be used in biosensors or biofuel cells. The direct electrochemistry of catalase at the CNT-modified gold and GC electrodes has also been reported [103-104], The electron transfer rate involving the heme Fe(III)/Fe(II) redox couple for catalase on the CNT-modified electrode is much faster than that on an unmodified electrode or other... 

In the quantum mechanical formulation of electron transfer (Atkins, 1984 Closs et al, 1986) as a radiationless transition, the rate of ET is described as the product of the electronic coupling term J2 and the Frank-Condon factor FC, which is weighted with the Boltzmann population of the vibrational energy levels. But Marcus and Sutin (1985) have pointed out that, in the high-temperature limit, this treatment yields the semiclassical expression (9). 

It has been shown so far that internal and external factors can be combined in the control of the electron-transfer rate. Although in most cases a simple theoretical treatment, e.g. by the Marcus approach, is prevented by the coincidence of these factors, it is clear that the observed features for the isoenergetic self-exchange differ by the electronic coupling and the free energy of activation. Then it is also difficult to separate the inner- and outer-sphere reorganization energies. 

---