Electronegativity Electronic configuration

Complete the concept map using the following terms electronegativity, electron configuration, periodic trends, ionic radius, atomic radius, ionization energy, and periodic table. 

The electron configuration or orbital diagram of an atom of an element can be deduced from its position in the periodic table. Beyond that, position in the table can be used to predict (Section 6.8) the relative sizes of atoms and ions (atomic radius, ionic radius) and the relative tendencies of atoms to give up or acquire electrons (ionization energy, electronegativity). 

All the elements in a main group have in common a characteristic valence electron configuration. The electron configuration controls the valence of the element (the number of bonds that it can form) and affects its chemical and physical properties. Five atomic properties are principally responsible for the characteristic properties of each element atomic radius, ionization energy, electron affinity, electronegativity, and polarizability. All five properties are related to trends in the effective nuclear charge experienced by the valence electrons and their distance from the nucleus. 

A correlation of isomer shift, electronic configuration, and calculated -electron densities for a number of ruthenium complexes in analogy to the Walker-Wertheim-Jaccarino diagram for iron compounds has been reported by Clausen et al. [ 127]. Also useful is the correlation between isomer shift and electronegativity as communicated by Clausen et al. [128] for ruthenium trihalides where the isomer shift appears to increase with increasing Mulliken electronegativity. 

Transition metal compounds with ligands of low electronegativity also show deviations, in spite of a d° electron configuration. For example, W(CH3)6 does not have the expected octahedral structure, but is trigonal-prismatic. 

Element Atomic Number Electronic Configuration Electronegativity Crystal Ionic Radius A°... 

Zinc, Cu and Ni have similar ionic radii and electron configurations (Table 5.6). Due to the similarity of the ionic radii of these three metals with Fe and Mg, Zn, Cu and Ni are capable of isomorphous substitution of Fe2+ and Mg2+ in the layer silicates. Due to differences in the electronegativity, however, isomorphous substitution of Cu2+ in silicates may be limited by the greater Pauling electronegativity of Cu2+ (2.0), whereas Zn2+ (1.6) and Ni2+ (1.8) are relatively more readily substituted for Fe2+ (1.8) or Mg2+ (1.3) (McBride, 1981). The three metals also readily coprecipitate with and form solid solutions in iron oxides (Lindsay, 1979 Table 5.7). 

Chromium has a similar electron configuration to Cu, because both have an outer electronic orbit of 4s. Since Cr3+, the most stable form, has a similar ionic radius (0.64 A0) to Mg (0.65 A0), it is possible that Cr3+ could readily substitute for Mg in silicates. Chromium has a lower electronegativity (1.6) than Cu2+ (2.0) and Ni (1.8). It is assumed that when substitution in an ionic crystal is possible, the element having a lower electronegativity will be preferred because of its ability to form a more ionic bond (McBride, 1981). Since chromium has an ionic radius similar to trivalent Fe (0.65°A), it can also substitute for Fe3+ in iron oxides. This may explain the observations (Han and Banin, 1997, 1999 Han et al., 2001a, c) that the native Cr in arid soils is mostly and strongly bound in the clay mineral structure and iron oxides compared to other heavy metals studied. On the other hand, humic acids have a high affinity with Cr (III) similar to Cu (Adriano, 1986). The chromium in most soils probably occurs as Cr (III) (Adriano, 1986). The chromium (III) in soils, especially when bound to... 

As a consequence of its closed-shell electron configuration, zinc has a negative electron affinity, that is, the removal of an electron from Zn is exothermic. The electronegativity of zinc (1.588 PU) is intermediate between those of the alkaline earth metals and the first row transition metals and remarkably similar to that of beryllium (1.57 PU). 

Electronegativity, Mendeleev number, Miedema parameters. A few semi-empirical parameters and scales which are useful as reference data in the systematic description (or even prediction) of the alloying behaviour of the different metals will be presented here also as an introduction to the following paragraphs. The closely related basic concepts of chemical periodicity and electron configurations will be reminded in Chapter 4. 

Element Atomic number Atomic mass Electronic configuration Pauling electronegativity Ionization potential Ionic radius Atomic radius... 

Symbol Sb atomic number 51 atomic weight 121.75 Group VA (group 15) element atomic radius 1.41A ionic radius 86 + 0.76A covalent radius 1.21A electronic configuration [Kr] 4di°5s25p3 a metalloid element electronegativity 1.82 (Allred-Rochow type) valence states +5, +3, 0 and -3 isotopes and natural abundance Sb-121 (57.3%), Sb-123 (42.7%)... 

Symbol As atomic number 33 atomic weight 74.922 covalent radius AsS+ 1.2 lA electron configuration [Ar] 4s23di°4p3 a Group VA (Group 15) metalloid element electronegativity 2.20 (Allred-Rochow type) principal valence states, -1-5, +3, 0, and -3 stable isotope As-75. 

---