Electron transfer diabatic

The two-dimensional electron transfer diabatic free energy surfaces in Figure 7 have been analyzed with the Golden Rule rate expression given in Eq. 46. This analysis suggests that FT and EPT are possible for both systems, but FT is the dominant path due to significant overlap between the proton vibrational wave... 

Figure 6. Diabatic and corresponding adiabatic potential energy along a relevant reaction coordinate for normal electron transfer...

M Marchi, IN Gehlen, D Chandler, M Newton. Diabatic surfaces and the pathway for primary electron transfer in a photosynthetic reaction center. 1 Am Chem Soc 115 4178-4190, 1993. 

Figure 6. Diabatic potential energy surfaces for electron transfer reactions in the system AL/B.

Fig. 12.2. Free energy data for electron transfer between the protein cytochrome c and the small acceptor microperoxidase-8 (MP8), from recent simulations [47]. Top Gibbs free energy derivative versus the coupling parameter A. The data correspond to solvated cytochrome c the MP8 contribution is not shown (adapted from [47]) Bottom the Marcus diabatic free energy curves. The simulation data correspond to cyt c and MP8, infinitely separated in aqueous solution. The curves intersect at 77 = 0, as they should. The reaction free energy is decomposed into a static and relaxation component, using the two steps shown by arrows a static, vertical step, then relaxation into the product state. All free energies in kcalmol-1. Adapted with permission from reference [88]...

Wigner rotation/adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrices, 92 Electronic structure theory, electron nuclear dynamics (END) structure and properties, 326-327 theoretical background, 324-325 time-dependent variational principle (TDVP), general nuclear dynamics, 334-337 Electronic wave function, permutational symmetry, 680-682 Electron nuclear dynamics (END) degenerate states chemistry, xii-xiii direct molecular dynamics, structure and properties, 327 molecular systems, 337-351 final-state analysis, 342-349 intramolecular electron transfer,... 

Fig. 1. The Marcus parabolic free energy surfaces corresponding to the reactant electronic state of the system (DA) and to the product electronic state of the system (D A ) cross (become resonant) at the transition state. The curves which cross are computed with zero electronic tunneling interaction and are known as the diabatic curves, and include the Born-Oppenheimer potential energy of the molecular system plus the environmental polarization free energy as a function of the reaction coordinate. Due to the finite electronic coupling between the reactant and charge separated states, a fraction k l of the molecular systems passing through the transition state region will cross over onto the product surface this electronically controlled fraction k l thus enters directly as a factor into the electron transfer rate constant...

The Landau-Zener expression is calculated in a time-dependent semiclassical manner from the diabatic surfaces (those depicted in Fig. 1) exactly because these surfaces, which describe the failure to react, are the appropriate zeroth order description for the long-range electron transfer case. As can be seen, in the very weak coupling limit (small A) the k l factor and hence the electron transfer rate constant become proportional to the absolute square of A ... 

Figure 6. Comparison of SH (thin lines), MFT (dashed lines), and exact quantum (thick lines) calculations obtained for Model IVb describing ultrafast intramolecular electron transfer. Shown are the time-dependent population probabilities P t) and Pf i) of the initially prepared adiabatic (a) and diabatic (b) electronic state, respectively, as well as the mean momentum of a representative vibrational mode (c).

Figure 7. Comparison of SH (thin solid line), MFT (dashed line), and quantum path-integral (solid line with dots) calculations (Ref. 198) obtained for Model Va describing electron transfer in solution. Shown is the time-dependent population probability Pf t) of the initially prepared diabatic electronic state.

Finally, we consider the performance of the MFT method for nonadiabatic dynamics induced by avoided crossings of the respective potential energy surfaces. We start with the discussion of the one-mode model. Model IVa, describing ultrafast intramolecular electron transfer. The comparison of the MFT method (dashed line) with the quantum-mechanical results (full line) shown in Fig. 5 demonstrates that the MFT method gives a rather good description of the short-time dynamics (up to 50 fs) for this model. For longer times, however, the dynamics is reproduced only qualitatively. Also shown is the time evolution of the diabatic electronic coherence which, too, is... 

Let us begin with the one-mode electron-transfer system. Model IVa, which still exhibits relatively simple oscillatory population dynamics [205]. SimUar to what is found in Fig. 5 for the mean-field description, the SH results shown in Fig. 13 are seen to qualitatively reproduce both diabatic and adiabatic populations, at least for short times. A closer inspection shows that the SH results underestimate the back transfer of the adiabatic population at t 50 and 80 fs. This is because the back reaction would require energetically forbidden electronic transitions which are not possible in the SH algorithm. Figure 13 also shows the SH results for the electronic coherence which are found to... 

Finally, we consider Model V by describing two examples of outer-sphere electron-transfer in solution. Figures 7 and 8 display results for the diabatic electronic population for Models Va and Vb, respectively. Similar to the mean-field trajectory calculations, for Model Va the SH results are in excellent agreement with the quantum calculations, while for Model Vb the SH method only is able to describe the short-time dynamics. As for the three-mode Model IVb discussed above, the SH calculations in particular predict an incorrect long-time limit for the diabatic population. The origin of this problem will be discussed in more detail in Section VI in the context of the mapping formulation. 

Finally, we discuss applications of the ZPE-corrected mapping formalism to nonadiabatic dynamics induced by avoided crossings of potential energy surfaces. Figure 27 shows the diabatic and adiabatic electronic population for Model IVb, describing ultrafast intramolecular electron transfer. As for the models discussed above, it is seen that the MFT result (y = 0) underestimates the relaxation of the electronic population while the full mapping result (y = 1) predicts a too-small population at longer times. In contrast to the models... 

Figure 28. Time-dependent (a) adiabatic and (b) diabatic electronic excited-state populations as obtained for Model Vb describing electron transfer in solution. Quantum path-integral results [199] (big dots) are compared to mapping results for the limiting cases y = 0 (dashed lines) and Y = 1 (dotted lines) as well as ZPE-adjusted mapping results for Yi p, = 0.3 (full lines).

Figure 29. Comparison of quantum path-integral results (thick tines) and ZPE-corrected mapping results (thin lines) for the diabatic electronic populations of a three-state electron transfer model describing (a) sequential and (b) superexchange electron transfer.

---