Electron rate-limiting effect

Theoretical models available in the literature consider the electron loss, the counter-ion diffusion, or the nucleation process as the rate-limiting steps they follow traditional electrochemical models and avoid any structural treatment of the electrode. Our approach relies on the electro-chemically stimulated conformational relaxation control of the process. Although these conformational movements179 are present at any moment of the oxidation process (as proved by the experimental determination of the volume change or the continuous movements of artificial muscles), in order to be able to quantify them, we need to isolate them from either the electrons transfers, the counter-ion diffusion, or the solvent interchange we need electrochemical experiments in which the kinetics are under conformational relaxation control. Once the electrochemistry of these structural effects is quantified, we can again include the other components of the electrochemical reaction to obtain a complete description of electrochemical oxidation. 

A seed dressing method based on electrons was developed and tested by Lindner et al. (1996) and Schauder (2003) as a direct method to improve seed quality and remove/reduce seedborne disease inocula. Electron seed dressing effectively removed common bunt spores (Tilletia caries) and reduced bunt levels compared to untreated seeds in field trials. However, its efficacy against M. nivale has not, as yet, been confirmed. Since this technique has potentially negative effects on germination rates of seed, it is limited to surface treatments (Jahn, 2002 Jahn et al., 2005). 

Consider first the diffusion-limited regime. The simplest experiment to perform is a chronoamperometric measurement, i.e. to monitor the current after a potential step to a value where an electroactive species will undergo electron transfer. This effectively allows us to monitor the rate of reaction, v, as a function of time, through the relationship ... 

The formation of the Wheland intermediate from the ion-radical pair as the critical reactive intermediate is common in both nitration and nitrosation processes. However, the contrasting reactivity trend in various nitrosation reactions with NO + (as well as the observation of substantial kinetic deuterium isotope effects) is ascribed to a rate-limiting deprotonation of the reversibly formed Wheland intermediate. In the case of aromatic nitration with NO, deprotonation is fast and occurs with no kinetic (deuterium) isotope effect. However, the nitrosoarenes (unlike their nitro counterparts) are excellent electron donors as judged by their low oxidation potentials as compared to parent arene.246 As a result, nitrosoarenes are also much better Bronsted bases249 than the corresponding nitro derivatives, and this marked distinction readily accounts for the large differentiation in the deprotonation rates of their respective conjugate acids (i.e., Wheland intermediates). 

Measured by CV at 100 mV s"1. When the effect of reversibility is taken into account the value is 6.3 kcal mol"1 for rate-limiting electron transfer. 

Because this reaction must involve two steps, diffusion of selenate into the interlayer spaces of the green rust followed by electron transfer from Fe(ll) green rust, Johnson and Bullen (2003) interpreted this result using a two-step model similar to that discussed above. The diffusion step presumably has very little isotopic fractionation associated with it. Step 2 might be expected to involve a kinetic isotope effect similar to that observed in the HCl reduction experiments. As is discussed above, if the diffusion step is partially rate-limiting, the isotopic fractionation for the overall process should be less than the kinetic isotope effect occurring at the reduction step. This appears to be the case, as the ese(vi)-se(iv) value of 7.4%o is somewhat smaller than that observed for reduction by strong HCl (12%o). 

---