Electron donor inner-sphere

Let us consider the electron transfer between two rigid metal ions located some distance x from each other in the bulk of the solution. It is assumed that the inner-sphere reorganization of the donor D and acceptor A does not take place. The experiments show that the rate constants of these reactions differ by many orders of magnitude and the processes have an activated character even for identical ions D and A. The questions to be answered are Why does the electron exchange between identical ions in the solution require activation What is the reaction coordinate ... 

Traditionally, electron transfer processes in solution and at surfaces have been classified into outer-sphere and inner-sphere mechanisms (1). However, the experimental basis for the quantitative distinction between these mechanisms is not completely clear, especially when electron transfer is not accompanied by either atom or ligand transfer (i.e., the bridged activated complex). We wish to describe how the advantage of using organometals and alkyl radicals as electron donors accrues from the wide structural variations in their donor abilities and steric properties which can be achieved as a result of branching the alkyl moiety at either the a- or g-carbon centers. 

When a reaction is adiabatic, the electron is transferred every time the system crosses the reaction hypersurface. In this case the preexponential factor is determined solely by the dynamics of the inner-and outer-sphere reorganization. Consequently the reaction rate is independent of the strength of the electronic interaction between the reactant and the metal. In particular, the reaction rate should be independent of the nature of the metal, which acts simply as an electron donor and acceptor. Almost by definition adiabatic electron-transfer reactions are expected to be fast. 

It has long been assumed that the rates of inner-sphere electron-transfer reactions for transition-metal complexes should be sensitive to the nature of the donor and acceptor orbital symmetries. Efforts to... 

Despite intense study of the chemical reactivity of the inorganic NO donor SNP with a number of electrophiles and nucleophiles (in particular thiols), the mechanism of NO release from this drug also remains incompletely understood. In biological systems, both enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways appear to be involved [28]. Nitric oxide release is thought to be preceded by a one-electron reduction step followed by release of cyanide, and an inner-sphere charge transfer reaction between the ni-trosonium ion (NO+) and the ferrous iron (Fe2+). Upon addition of SNP to tissues, formation of iron nitrosyl complexes, which are in equilibrium with S-nitrosothiols, has been observed. A membrane-bound enzyme may be involved in the generation of NO from SNP in vascular tissue [35], but the exact nature of this reducing activity is unknown. 

It is important to distinguish between outer-sphere and inner-sphere complexes. In inner-sphere complexes the surface hydroxyl groups act as o-donor ligands which increase the electron density of the coordinated metal ion. Cu(II) bound inner-... 

The Marcus classical free energy of activation is AG , the adiabatic preexponential factor A may be taken from Eyring s Transition State Theory as (kg T /h), and Kel is a dimensionless transmission coefficient (0 < k l < 1) which includes the entire efiFect of electronic interactions between the donor and acceptor, and which becomes crucial at long range. With Kel set to unity the rate expression has only nuclear factors and in particular the inner sphere and outer sphere reorganization energies mentioned in the introduction are dominant parameters controlling AG and hence the rate. It is assumed here that the rate constant may be taken as a unimolecular rate constant, and if needed the associated bimolecular rate constant may be constructed by incorporation of diffusional processes as ... 

The action of one-electron redox systems is readily understandable in the context of inner- and outer-sphere mechanisms, whereas two-electron redox systems require additional considerations. First, if a double one-electron transfer is possible from an organic substrate to the same metal ion, does it mean that the same molecule of an organic donor provides these two electrons, or do two molecules of the substrate act as one-electron donors ... 

Figure 11.1. Schematic views of various ways in which an organic chemical, i, may sorb to natural inorganic solids (a) adsorption from air to surfaces with limited water presence, (b) partitioning from aqueous solutions to the layer of vicinal water adjacent to surfaces that serves as an absorbent liquid, (c) adsorption from aqueous solution to specific surface sites due to electron donor-acceptor interactions, (d) adsorption of charged molecules from aqueous solution to complementarily charged surfaces due to electrostatic attractions, and (e) chemisorption due to surface bonding or inner sphere complex formation.

Y, this bond is at first going to be a two-center, three-electron bond (H5C6.. Y). This process of nucleophile addition can and must be viewed as an inner-sphere electron transfer. In other words, formation of the new bond is connected with a transfer of the electron to phenyl radical. Therefore, the good electron donor character of Y is necessary for this step eventually to lead to the efficient formation of (H5C6Y), i.e., the product anion radical. Galli and Gentili (1998) have evaluated the thermodynamic driving force (TDDF) of the nucleophile/radical addition step. With respect to this step, they classified a nucleophile... 

Two questions are inseparable how to optimize ion radical reactions, and how to facilitate electron transfer. As noted in the preceding chapters, electron transfers between donors and acceptors can proceed as outer-sphere or inner-sphere processes. In this connection, the routes to distinguish and regulate one and another process should be mentioned. The brief statement by Hubig, Rathore, and Kochi (1999) seems to be appropriate Outer-sphere electron transfers are characterized by (a) bimolecular rate constants that are temperature dependent and well correlated by Markus theory (b) no evidence for the formation of (discrete) encounter complexes (c) high dependence on solvent polarity (d) enhanced sensitivity to kinetic salt effects. 

But if we examine the localized near the donor or the acceptor crystal vibrations or intra-molecular vibrations, the electron transition may induce much larger changes in such modes. It may be the substantial shifts of the equilibrium positions, the frequencies, or at last, the change of the set of normal modes due to violation of the space structure of the centers. The local vibrations at electron transitions between the atomic centers in the polar medium are the oscillations of the rigid solvation spheres near the centers. Such vibrations are denoted by the inner-sphere vibrations in contrast to the outer-sphere vibrations of the medium. The expressions for the rate constant cited above are based on the smallness of the shift of the equilibrium position or the frequency in each mode (see Eqs. (11) and (13)). They may be useless for the case of local vibrations that are, as a rule, high-frequency ones. The general formal approach to the description of the electron transitions in such systems based on the method of density function was developed by Kubo and Toyozawa [7] within the bounds of the conception of the harmonic vibrations in the initial and final states. 

For both modern reagents PIFA and MoCls an inner-sphere radical transfer is expected, as depicted in Scheme 7. The Lewis acidic additives involved in the PIFA-mediated transformation create an iodonium species that forms a Jt-com-plex 26 with the substrate this subsequently leads to an electron transfer. In contrast, the electrophilic molybdenum chloride most probably coordinates to the oxygen atoms of the donor functions which will then start the transformation. Smooth conversions are obtained if the substituent R" adjacent to the donor (27) is another methoxy group or a bulky moiety. 

B. Inner-Sphere Complexes with Aromatic Amine Electron Donors... 

Figure 9.11 Two alternative pathways of redox cycles photocatalyzed by Te111 complexes (a) inner-sphere photoinduced electron transfer (PET) with ligand (L) electron donor and (b) outer-sphere PET with an external electron donor (D). (Adapted from Ciesla et al. [20])...

---