Electron and proton probes

ELECTRON AND PROTON PROBE DATA FROM PATHOLOGICAL SKIN... 

For fast reactions, the simplest kinetics experiment is to resolve the disappearance of the reactants, for example, by transient emission if the reaction can be photoinitiated and a reactant is luminescent. If there are multiple reaction channels available for reactant decay, the kinetics are described by a mono-exponential decay according to the sum of these rates of which PCET is only one. A more powerful experiment is to observe the disappearance of PCET reactants and growth of PCET products directly. In photoinitiated optical experiments, this means probing by transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy rather than transient emission. If PCET proceeds in a concerted fashion then concomitant mono-exponential disappearance of reactant and growth of product will be observed. If a stepwise mechanism operates, the growth of the products will be delayed (and fit by a bi-exponential function), however, this observation does not reveal the sequence in which the electron and proton were transferred. Moreover, in the limit where one of the steps is significantly faster then the other, the bi-exponential character of the kinetics trace will not be discernible, and the reaction may appear as if it were concerted. 

PCET rate formalisms are cast primarily in terms of solvent coordinates for both the electron and proton, since both are charged particles that couple to the solvent polarization [5, 24]. In a concerted PCET reaction, the coupled transfer must occur via a common transition state and a common solvent configuration on both solvent coordinates. An ultrafast PCET reaction could be photoinitiated with resonant excitation, and a TOR probe would subsequently reveal the evolution of the two-dimensional reaction coordinate via the solvent response. Working in concert, these experiments would offer a powerful means to evaluate the coupling between the two coordinates in different types of PCET reactions and thus enable the PCET trajectories within the 2D space of Fig. 17.2 to be determined with much greater clarity. 

The second question probes deeper Why do the two electrometer spheres, when charged, exert force on each other What is our explanation of this phenomenon We say that the spheres have an excess of electrons (or protons) and these electrons (or protons) exert force on... 

After the discovery of the combined charge and space symmetry violation, or CP violation, in the decay of neutral mesons [2], the search for the EDMs of elementary particles has become one of the fundamental problems in physics. A permanent EDM is induced by the super-weak interactions that violate both space inversion symmetry and time reversal invariance [11], Considerable experimental efforts have been invested in probing for atomic EDMs (da) induced by EDMs of the proton, neutron, and electron, and by the P,T-odd interactions between them. The best available limit for the electron EDM, de, was obtained from atomic T1 experiments [12], which established an upper limit of de < 1.6 x 10 27e-cm. The benchmark upper limit on a nuclear EDM is obtained from the atomic EDM experiment on Iyt,Hg [13] as d ig < 2.1 x 10 2 e-cm, from which the best restriction on the proton EDM, dp < 5.4 x 10 24e-cm, was also obtained by Dmitriev and Senkov [14]. The previous upper limit on the proton EDM was estimated from the molecular T1F experiments by Hinds and co-workers [15]. 

If high temperatures eventually lead to an almost equal population of the ground and excited states of spectroscopically active structure elements, their absorption and emission may be quite weak, particularly if relaxation processes between these states are slow. The spectroscopic methods covered in Table 16-1 are numerous and not equally suited for the study of solid state kinetics. The number of methods increases considerably if we include particle radiation (electrons, neutrons, protons, atoms, or ions). We note that the output radiation is not necessarily of the same type as the input radiation (e.g., in photoelectron spectroscopy). Therefore, we have to restrict this discussion to some relevant methods and examples which demonstrate the applicability of in-situ spectroscopy to kinetic investigations at high temperature. Let us begin with nuclear spectroscopies in which nuclear energy levels are probed. Later we will turn to those methods in which electronic states are involved (e.g., UV, VIS, and IR spectroscopies). 

High-resolution compositional measurements are possible through use of a variety of microanalytical methods. Ideally, these should be non-destructive, can be targeted on small areas of sample, and have low minimum detection limits. Electron-probe X-ray microanalysis (EPXMA) and proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) techniques have both been used successfully on archaeological sediment thin sections (19, 20). Both techniques yield elemental composition data for a range of elements. EPXMA has the advantage of being nondestructive, whereas PIXE when used on thin-section samples is typically destructive conversely the detection limit for PIXE is lower than EPXMA. 

Conformational changes in diiron center of stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase caused by substrate binding have been probed by EPR and proton ENDOR of cryoreduced diferric protein.80 EPR spectra of the one-electron reduced Fe(III)Fe(II)... 

In particle probe analysis systems, x-rays are generated from the elements due to an excitation caused by the impinging particles, whether they are electrons or protons, and these secondary x-rays are emitted in all directions. However, the detector can only cover a small part of the sphere of secondary radiation (Figure 5.3), even if the geometry of the experimental setup allows the detector to come very close to the object, which will increase the spatial angle from which the detector sees the volume of analysis. Here we see a factor which influences markedly the sensitivity of the analysis method. 

The two most important methods of both probing and stimulating supramolecular devices are photochemical and electrochemical techniques. The most prevalent events to occur in such devices are electron, energy and proton transfer, as well as molecular rearrangement. Any of these events can provide the basis for forms of transducable output on which molecular electronic devices may be based. Therefore, the theories most commonly applied to such electrochemically and photochemically triggered events are outlined in this chapter. In addition, an overview of the mechanisms by which such events occur is provided, identifying the molecular or physical parameters required to make such events feasible in a supramolecular structure. 

These interfacial pH effects have been investigated by probing the voltammetry in buffered solutions. Figure 5.16 shows that for 1.0 < pFl < 10.6, E0 depends linearly on pH, with a slope of 63 3 mV. This value is indistinguishable from the slope of 59 mV pH-1 expected for a coupled proton/electron transfer and indicates that the H2Q species is produced when the monolayer is reduced. Between pH 10.6 and 12.0, the slope decreases to 25 4 mV pH-1, which compares favorably with the slope expected (29.5 mV pH-1) for a two-electron, one-proton transfer reaction. Therefore, over this pH range Q is reduced to HQ- and the p/12.0, E0 is independent of pH, thus indicating that the pKa of the HQ-/Q2- couple is 12.0 0.2. 

---