Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electromagnetic field gauge transformation

Now the Lagrangean associated with the nuclear motion is not invariant under a local gauge transformation. Eor this to be the case, the Lagrangean needs to include also an interaction field. This field can be represented either as a vector field (actually a four-vector, familiar from electromagnetism), or as a tensorial, YM type field. Whatever the form of the field, there are always two parts to it. First, the field induced by the nuclear motion itself and second, an externally induced field, actually produced by some other particles E, R, which are not part of the original formalism. (At our convenience, we could include these and then these would be part of the extended coordinates r, R. The procedure would then result in the appearance of a potential interaction, but not having the field. ) At a first glance, the field (whether induced internally... [Pg.151]

The electromagnetic field is a well-known example of a gauge theory. A gauge transformation of the form... [Pg.134]

The electromagnetic field may now formally be interpreted as the gauge field which must be introduced to ensure invariance under local U( 1) gauge transformation. In the most general case the field variables are introduced in terms of the Lagrangian density of the field, which itself is gauge invariant. In the case of the electromagnetic field, as before,... [Pg.168]

The transformation of the relativistic expression for the operator of magnetic multipole radiation (4.8) may be done similarly to the case of electric transitions. As has already been mentioned, in this case the corresponding potential of electromagnetic field does not depend on the gauge condition, therefore, there is only the following expression for the non-relativistic operator of Mk-transitions (in a.u.) ... [Pg.31]

Here,, 4 ( is the vector 4-potential introduced in the vacuum as part of the covariant derivative, and therefore introduced by spacetime curvature. The electromagnetic field and the topological charge g are the results of the invariance of the Lagrangian (868) under local U(l) gauge transformation, in other words, the results of spacetime curvature. [Pg.152]

The total Lagrangian if I X I if2 is now invariant under the local gauge transformation because of the introduction of the 4-potential A, which couples to the current of the complex A of the pure gauge vacuum. The field A also contributes to the Lagrangian, and since if + ifj + if2 is invariant, an extra term if3 appears, which must also be gauge-invariant. This can be so only if the electromagnetic field is introduced... [Pg.163]

Since ip depends on space-time coordinates, the relative phase factor of ip at two different points would be completely arbitrary and accordingly, a must also be a function of space-time. To preserve invariance it is necessary to compensate the variation of the phase a (a ) by introducing the electromagnetic potentials (T4.5). In similar vein the gravitational field appears as the compensating gauge field under Lorentz invariant local isotopic gauge transformation [150]. [Pg.166]

Chemical behaviour depends on chemical potential and electromagnetic interaction. Both of these factors depend on the local curvature of space-time, commonly identified with the vacuum. Any chemical or phase transformation is caused by an interaction that changes the symmetry of the gauge field. It is convenient to describe such events in terms of a Lagrangian density which is invariant under gauge transformation and reveals the details of the interaction as a function of the symmetry. The chemically important examples of crystal nucleation and the generation of entropy by time flow will be discussed next. The important conclusion is that in all cases, the gauge field arises from a symmetry of space-time and the nature of chemical matter and interaction reduces to a function of space-time structure. [Pg.166]

If the physical results are to remain unchanged under a unitary transformation, it is necessary to transform the operators as well as the state functions (eqns (8.28) and (8.29)). A gauge transformation has no effect on a coordinate operator but the momentum operator p is changed into p + [e/c) x- Thus, to maintain gauge invariance in properties determined by the momentum operator, p must be replaced by a new operator. In the presence of an electromagnetic field or just a magnetic field, the momentum operator is replaced by the expression... [Pg.404]

It was slowly realized [39] that whereas the electromagnetic potentials uniquely defines the electromagnetic fields, they are themselves unique only to within gauge transformations... [Pg.351]

At this point it is crucial to note that this latter form was chosen to obey the requirement of Lorentz invariance. Under a gauge transformation only the interaction term is modified as the electromagnetic field tensor is gauge invariant... [Pg.354]

That is, this pair of A and also leads to the same B and E. This kind of transformation of potential functions is called a gauge transformation. Thus, we can say that the electromagnetic field is invariable against the gauge transformation. [Pg.37]

Although Weyl s geometry did not produce the desired unification, the modified theory developed into a convincing definition of the electromagnetic field in wave formalism. The gauge transformation is now formulated as... [Pg.115]

The principle of local invariance in a curved Riemannian manifold leads to the appearance of compensating fields. Like the electromagnetic field, which is the compensating field of local phase transformation, the gravitational field may be interpreted as the compensating field of local Lorentz transformations. In modern physics all interactions are understood in terms of theories which combine local gauge invariance with spontaneous symmetry breaking. [Pg.115]

In the case of an electron wave function the required gauge field must be the electromagnetic field. To find the correct form of this compensating field we look for the transformed wave function... [Pg.396]


See other pages where Electromagnetic field gauge transformation is mentioned: [Pg.637]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.768]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.466]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]




SEARCH



Electromagnetic field

Field gauge

Gauge transformation

© 2024 chempedia.info