Electrochemical machining limitations

Manufacturing engineers wishing to use ECM processes in industry need to address the challenge of proper tool design. The cost of design can be as much as 20% of the cost of an electrochemical machine for complex components. PredictabiUty of overcuts obtained for specific appHcations and the particular electrolytes to be used for the alloy metals that have to be machined must also be considered along with specific controls and limits on the ECM equipment needed. 

Investigations of random processes by pulse experiments, which are not limited by diffusion in the electrolyte, are much less common. The increasing interest of industry to introduce pulse techniques, such as pulse plating [22], formation of gradient layers, or pulse electrochemical machining (PECM) [23], will help making these techniques more popular. 

Static electrode electrochemical machining techniques are limited in the form and accuracy of their machined products as metal is removed from the workpiece, the interelectrode gap increases and the metal removal rate falls. This problem may be overcome by continuously moving the tool (or the workpiece) in order to maintain a constant gap. This is the principle behind electrochemical forming (sometimes called electrochemical sinking), which is perhaps the most important and versatile application of electrochemical machining. 

These effects are important for intense metal dissolution during pitting and electrochemical machining of metals where very high anodic current densities are effective. For anodic potentiostatic transients, the precipitation of a salt film slows down an initially higher dissolution rate and starts diffusion-limited electropolishing of the metal surface. 

Electrochemical milling (ECM) offers complete freedom of choice of material and pocket shape. This technique employs a liquid electrolyte to erode the roll or segment material thereby reproducing exactly the shape of the electrode (Figure 281). Using this method, not only finally machined and hardened materials can be treated economically without any distortion but also no limitation whatsoever exists regarding pocket shape. The ECM technique can reproduce such detail that even identifying marks can be incorporated. 

The counter-electrode chosen should be as large as possible and made up of a material that is resistant to the electrolyte used. For sodium hydroxide, a good choice is stainless steel or nickel. As the counter-electrode is generally used with anodic polarisation, one should be aware that some electrochemical dissolution will take place. If the electrode surface is very large, current densities will remain small and therefore limit anodic dissolution of the electrode material. The geometry of the counter-electrode should be such that the inter-electrode resistance will remain constant during machining. This resistance should also... 

However, although countless examples of fluorescence or electrochemical labels have been demonstrated as signal-generating components of aptamer-based sensors, the specific nucleic acid structure of these novel binders has so far not been used sufficiently to improve the sensitivities, and thus the detection limit, of sensorial approaches. A combination of aptamers and DNA machines might take the field to new heights. 

However, WECM is a transport-limited electrochemical dissolving process and as the tiny lEG of several micron or submicron dimensions become deeper and narrower with machining time, removal of electrolysis products, namely the hydroxides and hydrogen gas, and renewal of fresh electrolytes... 

---