Electrical double charge

A number of refinements and applications are in the literature. Corrections may be made for discreteness of charge [36] or the excluded volume of the hydrated ions [19, 37]. The effects of surface roughness on the electrical double layer have been treated by several groups [38-41] by means of perturbative expansions and numerical analysis. Several geometries have been treated, including two eccentric spheres such as found in encapsulated proteins or drugs [42], and biconcave disks with elastic membranes to model red blood cells [43]. The double-layer repulsion between two spheres has been a topic of much attention due to its importance in colloidal stability. A new numeri-... 

Often the van der Waals attraction is balanced by electric double-layer repulsion. An important example occurs in the flocculation of aqueous colloids. A suspension of charged particles experiences both the double-layer repulsion and dispersion attraction, and the balance between these determines the ease and hence the rate with which particles aggregate. Verwey and Overbeek [44, 45] considered the case of two colloidal spheres and calculated the net potential energy versus distance curves of the type illustrated in Fig. VI-5 for the case of 0 = 25.6 mV (i.e., 0 = k.T/e at 25°C). At low ionic strength, as measured by K (see Section V-2), the double-layer repulsion is overwhelming except at very small separations, but as k is increased, a net attraction at all distances... 

The adhesion between two solid particles has been treated. In addition to van der Waals forces, there can be an important electrostatic contribution due to charging of the particles on separation [76]. The adhesion of hematite particles to stainless steel in aqueous media increased with increasing ionic strength, contrary to intuition for like-charged surfaces, but explainable in terms of electrical double-layer theory [77,78]. Hematite particles appear to form physical bonds with glass surfaces and chemical bonds when adhering to gelatin [79]. 

Much use has been made of micellar systems in the study of photophysical processes, such as in excited-state quenching by energy transfer or electron transfer (see Refs. 214-218 for examples). In the latter case, ions are involved, and their selective exclusion from the Stem and electrical double layer of charged micelles (see Ref. 219) can have dramatic effects, and ones of potential imfKntance in solar energy conversion systems. 

As we have discussed earlier in the context of surfaces and interfaces, the breaking of the inversion synnnetry strongly alters the SFIG from a centrosynnnetric medium. Surfaces and interfaces are not the only means of breaking the inversion synnnetry of a centrosynnnetric material. Another important perturbation is diat induced by (static) electric fields. Such electric fields may be applied externally or may arise internally from a depletion layer at the interface of a semiconductor or from a double-charge layer at the interface of a liquid. 

Here we consider the total interaction between two charged particles in suspension, surrounded by tlieir counterions and added electrolyte. This is tire celebrated DLVO tlieory, derived independently by Derjaguin and Landau and by Verwey and Overbeek [44]. By combining tlie van der Waals interaction (equation (02.6.4)) witli tlie repulsion due to the electric double layers (equation (C2.6.lOI), we obtain... 

The well-known DLVO theory of coUoid stabiUty (10) attributes the state of flocculation to the balance between the van der Waals attractive forces and the repulsive electric double-layer forces at the Hquid—soHd interface. The potential at the double layer, called the zeta potential, is measured indirectly by electrophoretic mobiUty or streaming potential. The bridging flocculation by which polymer molecules are adsorbed on more than one particle results from charge effects, van der Waals forces, or hydrogen bonding (see Colloids). 

When two conducting phases come into contact with each other, a redistribution of charge occurs as a result of any electron energy level difference between the phases. If the two phases are metals, electrons flow from one metal to the other until the electron levels equiUbrate. When an electrode, ie, electronic conductor, is immersed in an electrolyte, ie, ionic conductor, an electrical double layer forms at the electrode—solution interface resulting from the unequal tendency for distribution of electrical charges in the two phases. Because overall electrical neutrality must be maintained, this separation of charge between the electrode and solution gives rise to a potential difference between the two phases, equal to that needed to ensure equiUbrium. 

On the electrode side of the double layer the excess charges are concentrated in the plane of the surface of the electronic conductor. On the electrolyte side of the double layer the charge distribution is quite complex. The potential drop occurs over several atomic dimensions and depends on the specific reactivity and atomic stmcture of the electrode surface and the electrolyte composition. The electrical double layer strongly influences the rate and pathway of electrode reactions. The reader is referred to several excellent discussions of the electrical double layer at the electrode—solution interface (26-28). 

Electrically, the electrical double layer may be viewed as a capacitor with the charges separated by a distance of the order of molecular dimensions. The measured capacitance ranges from about two to several hundred microfarads per square centimeter depending on the stmcture of the double layer, the potential, and the composition of the electrode materials. Figure 4 illustrates the behavior of the capacitance and potential for a mercury electrode where the double layer capacitance is about 16 p.F/cm when cations occupy the OHP and about 38 p.F/cm when anions occupy the IHP. The behavior of other electrode materials is judged to be similar. 

The physical separation of charge represented allows externally apphed electric field forces to act on the solution in the diffuse layer. There are two phenomena associated with the electric double layer that are relevant electrophoresis when a particle is moved by an electric field relative to the bulk and electroosmosis, sometimes called electroendosmosis, when bulk fluid migrates with respect to an immobilized charged surface. 

In some cases, e.g., the Hg/NaF q interface, Q is charge dependent but concentration independent. Then it is said that there is no specific ionic adsorption. In order to interpret the charge dependence of Q a standard explanation consists in assuming that Q is related to the existence of a solvent monolayer in contact with the wall [16]. From a theoretical point of view this monolayer is postulated as a subsystem coupled with the metal and the solution via electrostatic and non-electrostatic interactions. The specific shape of Q versus a results from the competition between these interactions and the interactions between solvent molecules in the mono-layer. This description of the electrical double layer has been revisited by... 

The potential difference across the electric double layer A. This cannot be determined in absolute terms but must be defined with reference to another charged interface, i.e. a reference electrode. In the case of a corroding metal the potential is the corrosion potential which arises from the mutual polarisation of the anodic and cathodic reactions constituting the overall corrosion reaction see Section 1.4). 

Fig 20.13 (a) Electrical double layer and (b) electrical triple layer (after Bockris and Reddy ). Note that Layer 2 in (b) is produced by adsorption of negative ions on the negatively charged... 

---