Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electric potential across double layer

Fig. 1. The structure of the electrical double layer where Q represents the solvent CD, specifically adsorbed anions 0, anions and (D, cations. The inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) is the center of specifically adsorbed ions. The outer Helmholtz plane (OHP) is the closest point of approach for solvated cations or molecules. O, the corresponding electric potential across the double layer, is also shown. Fig. 1. The structure of the electrical double layer where Q represents the solvent CD, specifically adsorbed anions 0, anions and (D, cations. The inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) is the center of specifically adsorbed ions. The outer Helmholtz plane (OHP) is the closest point of approach for solvated cations or molecules. O, the corresponding electric potential across the double layer, is also shown.
The surface potential of a liquid solvent s, %, is defined as the difference in electrical potentials across the interface between this solvent and the gas phase, with the assumption that the outer potential of the solvent is zero. The potential arises from a preferred orientation of the solvent dipoles in the free surface zone. At the surface of the solution, the electric field responsible for the surface potential may arise from a preferred orientation of the solvent and solute dipoles, and from the ionic double layer. The potential as the difference in electrical potential across the interface between the phase and gas, is not measurable. However, the relative changes caused by the change in the solution s composition can be determined using the proper voltaic cells (see Sections XII-XV). [Pg.16]

AC Electroosmosis is due to the interactions of the tangential electric field with the induced charges on each electrode, which results in electroosmotic force and fluid velocity in the horizontal direction. The AC-EO flow was previously explained in Refs. [2-4]. The tangential AC electric field produces electroosmotic fluid velocity due to the potential drop across double layer on the electrodes, which can be represented as [4]... [Pg.275]

Figure 1. Schematic diagram (top) of electric potential across the double layer based on Gouy-Chapman-Stem model in which the solvent is a continuum dielectric. The cartoon (bottom) depicts a hypothetical arrangement of solvent and ions near a charged surface. Similar pictures are found in electrochemical texts. The labels IHP and OHP mark the inner and outer Helmholtz planes. Figure 1. Schematic diagram (top) of electric potential across the double layer based on Gouy-Chapman-Stem model in which the solvent is a continuum dielectric. The cartoon (bottom) depicts a hypothetical arrangement of solvent and ions near a charged surface. Similar pictures are found in electrochemical texts. The labels IHP and OHP mark the inner and outer Helmholtz planes.
A very pronounced double-layer effect is also observed in the voltammetry of adsorbed outer-sphere reactants." For instance, the voltammetry of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkane-thiols containing a terminal redox group (e.g., ferrocene) is strongly influenced by the electric field across the SAM, and this is manifested in peak broadening and a shift in the half-wave potential. Because redox-active SAMs are frequently geometrically very well defined, and their dielectric properties can be measured, the electric field across these layers can be readily computed from electrostatics to obtain the electric potential at the redox center. This in turn can be used to compute the influence of the electric potential distribution on voltammetric response, which can then be quantitatively compared to experiment. [Pg.31]

The potential difference across the electric double layer A. This cannot be determined in absolute terms but must be defined with reference to another charged interface, i.e. a reference electrode. In the case of a corroding metal the potential is the corrosion potential which arises from the mutual polarisation of the anodic and cathodic reactions constituting the overall corrosion reaction see Section 1.4). [Pg.1005]

FIGURE 1-12 Variation of the potential across the electrical double layer. [Pg.20]

An electric potential drop across the boundary between two dissimiliar phases as well as at their surfaces exposed to a neutral gas phase is the most characteristic feature of every interface and surface electrified due to ion separation and dipole orientation. This charge separation is usually described as an ionic double layer. [Pg.14]

The presence of an electrical potential drop, i.e., interfacial potential, across the boundary between two dissimilar phases, as well as at their surfaces exposed to a neutral gas phase, is the most characteristic feature of every interface and surface electrified due to the ion separation and dipole orientation. This charge separation is usually described as the formation of the ionic and dipolar double layers. The main interfacial potential is the Galvani potential (termed also by Trasatti the operative potential), which is the difference of inner potentials (p and of both phases. It is a function only of the chemical... [Pg.18]

The description of the ion transfer process is closely related to the structure of the electrical double layer at the ITIES [50]. The most widely used approach is the combination of the BV equation and the modified Verwey-Niessen (MVN) model. In the MVN model, the electrical double layer at the ITIES is composed of two diffuse layers and one ion-free or inner layer (Fig. 8). The positions delimiting the inner layer are denoted by X2 and X2, and represent the positions of closest approach of the transferring ion to the ITIES from the organic and aqueous side, respectively. The total Galvani potential drop across the interfacial region, AgCp = cj) — [Pg.545]

Potential differences at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) are typical Galvani potential differences and cannot be measured directly. However, their existence follows from the properties of the electrical double layer at the ITIES (Section 4.5.3) and from the kinetics of charge transfer across the ITIES (Section 5.3.2). By means of potential differences at the ITIES or at the aqueous electrolyte-solid electrolyte phase boundary (Eq. 3.1.23), the phenomena occurring at the membranes of ion-selective electrodes (Section 6.3) can be explained. [Pg.201]

For semiconductor electrodes and also for the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES), the greatest part of the potential difference between the two phases is represented by the potentials of the diffuse electric layers in the two phases (see Eq. 4.5.18). The rate of the charge transfer across the compact part of the double layer then depends very little on the overall potential difference. The potential dependence of the charge transfer rate is connected with the change in concentration of the transferred species at the boundary resulting from the potentials in the diffuse layers (Eq. 4.3.5), which, of course, depend on the overall potential difference between the two phases. In the case of simple ion transfer across ITIES, the process is very rapid being, in fact, a sort of diffusion accompanied with a resolvation in the recipient phase. [Pg.289]

Emersion has been shown to result in the retention of the double layer structure i.e, the structure including the outer Helmholtz layer. Thus, the electric double layer is characterised by the electrode potential, the surface charge on the metal and the chemical composition of the double layer itself. Surface resistivity measurements have shown that the surface charge is retained on emersion. In addition, the potential of the emersed electrode, , can be determined in the form of its work function, , since and represent the same quantity the electrochemical potential of the electrons in the metal. Figure 2.116 is from the work of Kotz et al. (1986) and shows the work function of a gold electrode emersed at various potentials from a perchloric acid solution the work function was determined from UVPES measurements. The linear plot, and the unit slope, are clear evidence that the potential drop across the double layer is retained before and after emersion. The chemical composition of the double layer can also be determined, using AES, and is consistent with the expected solvent and electrolyte. In practice, the double layer collapses unless (i) potentiostatic control is maintained up to the instant of emersion and (ii) no faradaic processes, such as 02 reduction, are allowed to occur after emersion. [Pg.227]

The electroosmotic pumping is executed when an electric field is applied across the channel. The moving force comes from the ion moves in the double layer at the wall towards the electrode of opposite polarity, which creates motion of the fluid near the walls and transfer of the bulk fluid in convection motion via viscous forces. The potential at the shear plane between the fixed Stem layer and Gouy-Champmon layer is called zeta potential, which is strongly dependent on the chemistry of the two phase system, i.e. the chemical composition of both solution and wall surface. The electroosmotic mobility, xeo, can be defined as follow,... [Pg.388]

Despite these arguments and the conceptual attractiveness of the procedure which is sketched in Fig. 1 convincing evidence for the relevance of a particular gas phase adsorption experiment can only be obtained by direct comparison to electrochemical data The electrode potential and the work function change are two measurable quantities which are particularly useful for such a comparison. In both measurements the variation of the electrostatic potential across the interface can be obtained and compared by properly referencing these two values 171. Together with the ionic excess charge in the double layer, which in the UHV experiment would be expressed in terms of coverage of the ionic species, the macroscopic electrical properties of the interracial capacitor can thus be characterized in both environments. [Pg.56]

The electrokinetic potential (zeta potential, Q is the potential drop across the mobile part of the double layer (Fig. 3.2c) that is responsible for electrokinetic phenomena, for example, elecrophoresis (= motion of colloidal particles in an electric field). It is assumed that the liquid adhering to the solid (particle) surface and the mobile liquid are separated by a shear plane (slipping plane). The electrokinetic charge is the charge on the shear plane. [Pg.50]

Usually, there is an electrostatic potential of the order of 1 V across the electric double layer at tbe interface between a metal and an aqueous solution this potential produces an intense electric field of the order of 10 V cm in the compact layer 0.3 to 0.5 mn thick. Such an intense electric field can not be realized in any dielectrics of macroscopic size, because of dieleelectron avalanche, but the intense electric field can be sustained in a layer of several atomic thidmess where no electron avalanche can occur. [Pg.128]


See other pages where Electric potential across double layer is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.774]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.131]   


SEARCH



Double layer potential across

Electric double layer

Electrical Double Layer Potential

Electrical double layer

Electrical potential

Electrical/electrically double-layer

Potential across

Potential double layer

© 2024 chempedia.info