Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sieve tray extractors efficiency

The sieve tray extractor is amenable to mechanistic modeling. Seibert and Fair (1993) provide a rigorous model for the prediction of efficiency. [Pg.513]

The Graesser contactor takes an extreme position in the diagram. It has the highest separation efficiency (10 stages per meter) but the lowest capacity (1-2 m/h). The other extremum takes the static sieve tray extractor with only one equilibrium stage per meter and up to 50 m/h capacity. The capacity of a pulsed sieve tray column is as high as 30 m/h with a separation efficiency of 5 to 6 stages per meter. [Pg.365]

FIG. 23-38 Efficiency and capacity range of small-diameter extractors, 50 to 150 mm diameter. Acetone extracted from water with toluene as the disperse phase, V /V = 1.5. Code AC = agitated cell PPC = pulsed packed column PST = pulsed sieve tray RDC = rotating disk contactor PC = packed column MS = mixer-settler ST = sieve tray. (Stichlmair, Chem. Ing. Tech. 52(3), 253-255 [1980]). [Pg.2118]

Pulsing means that either the whole liquid content of a sieve tray column is continually pushed up and down by a piston that moves to and fro, or the whole plate package is moved up and down [3]. Figure 9.5 illustrates the two extractor constructions schematically. They show about the same efficiency... [Pg.378]

Sieve-tray towers are very effective, both with respect to liquid-handling capacity and extraction efficiency, particularly for systems of low interfacial tension which do not require mechanical agitation for good dispersion. The general assembly of plates and downspouts is much the same as for gas-liquid contact except that a weir is not required. Towers packed with the same random packing used for gas-liquid contact have also been used for liquid extractors however, mass-transfer rates are poor. It is recommended instead that sieve-tray towers be used for systems of low interfacial tension and mechanically agitated extractors for those of high interfacial tension (Treybal, 1980). [Pg.463]

Generally, the mass transfer between two liquid phases in liquid-liquid extraction is substantially slower than that for rectification processes. Small values of the tray efficiency factors therefore follow. With average extraction, tray efficiency factors range from 0.3-0.7 with sieve trays, and 0.3-0.6 with Koch cascade trays. Only in mixer-settler cascades and with centrifugal extractors is the actual tray efficiency almost the theoretical tray efficiency. [Pg.412]


See other pages where Sieve tray extractors efficiency is mentioned: [Pg.476]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.1730]    [Pg.1782]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.1724]    [Pg.1776]    [Pg.2118]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.1875]    [Pg.1730]    [Pg.2132]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.1724]    [Pg.2122]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.512 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]




SEARCH



Efficiency extractors

Extractor

Sieve tray extractors

Sieve trays

Sieves efficiency

Tray efficiency

© 2024 chempedia.info