Efficacy testing, clinical trials

Once a suitable strain is available, the prachce is to grow, often ftom a single organism, a sizeable culture which is distributed in small amounts in a large number of ampoules and then stored at 70°C or freeze-dried. This is the seed lot. From this seed lot, one or more ampoules are taken and used as the seed to originate a limited number of batches of vaccine which are first examined exhaustively in the laboratory and then, if found to be satisfactory, tested for safety and efficacy in clinical trials. Satisfactory results in the clinical trials validate the seed lot as the seed from which batches of vaccine for routine use can subsequently be produced. 

The previous chapter provided examples of statistical analyses that are used to assess efficacy in clinical trials. In this and the following chapter, the focus moves to assessments of safety. As will be seen in the first part of this chapter, general safety assessments are conducted quite differently from those for efficacy, in that descriptive statistics are used as opposed to hypothesis testing. However, in the domain of cardiovascular safety, hypothesis-testing approaches are employed to investigate the potential occurrence of specific cardiac and cardiovascular adverse events. In the language introduced in this chapter, these can be regarded as adverse events of special interest. 

Human growth hormone, used as a human pharmaceutical, is approved for only one indication in the United States, treatment of growth failure owing to hGH deficiency, a condition known as pituitary dwarfism. However, clinical trials are under way to test its efficacy in Turner s syndrome, bums, wound healing, cachexia, osteoporosis, constitutional growth delay, aging, malnutrition, and obesity. 

The first study to demonstrate the activity of enfuvirtide in HIV-infected patients (Kilby et al. 1998) showed that patients receiving the maximum 100 mg intravenous dose had maximum median declines in HIV-1 RNA of -1.96 logjo copies/mL through 14 days. Several additional studies (Kilby et al. 2002 Lalezari et al. 2003a, b) further demonstrated the safety and efficacy of enfuvirtide and led to the selection of twice-daily subcutaneous injections of a 90 mg nominal dose for testing in the TORO (T-20 vs. optimized regimen only) pivotal clinical trials. 

Phase II investigates the compound s efficacy and safety in controlled clinical trials for a specific therapeutic indication. To eliminate as many competing factors as possible, Phase II trials are narrowly controlled. They are characterized as small—several hundred subjects with the indicated disease or symptoms—and are closely monitored. The control may be either a placebo study arm or an active control arm. The endpoint measured may be the clinical outcome of interest or a surrogate. Phase II trials may last for several months or even several years. Early pilot trials to evaluate safety and efficacy are called Phase Ila. Later trials, called Phase lib, are important tests of the compound s efficacy. These trials may constitute the pivotal trials used to establish the drug s safety and efficacy. At least one pivotal trial (most frequently a large, randomized Phase III study) is done. Only about one third of compounds entered into Phase II will begin Phase III studies [61],... 

---