Effective resonance integral table

Table 10.1 Effective Resonance Integrals for Infinitely Dilute Mi.xtures of Various Nuclear Fuels (in barns)...

This result is the so-called infinite-dilution effective resonance integral. The sum of over all resonances has been measured for many materials (see, for example, Table 10.1). At the other extreme, when /S 1 — b, as often happens in the low-energy resonances of uranium and thorium or other absorbers in fairly concentrated mixtures, it is seen that is proportional to This rule is roughly verified by experiment. ... 

Table 10.4 Calculated Contributions to the Effective Resonance Integrals of U and Th ...

The previous discussion has been concerned with thiocyanate complexes, but a similar situation obtains with selenocyanates [437, 438). Table XI includes the frequency ranges for different modes of seleno-cyanate coordination. Kharitonov et al. (439) obtained similar results for selenocyanate complexes as for thiocyanate complexes in their theoretical treatment outlined previously, and their conclusions are the same in both cases. Thus, frequency shifts can be due to electronic effects or to changes in the bonding mode. The relative contributions of the resonance forms of NCSe (Table X) are comparable to those of NCS so that integrated intensities can be used in a similar way, and with the same possible dangers. Table XII contains some infrared data... 

The progress of the reaction was again monitored by NMR spectroscopy. Our criterion for catalytic turnover was that each cucurbituril molecule would lead to the formation of more than one triazole ring. This ratio was calculated from the integration of the sum of all triazole proton resonances (encapsulated and free) divided by 1/12 of the integration arising from a cucurbituril resonance. In an exploratory effort the effect of catalyst concentration, temperature and type of solvent, as shown in Table 1.2, were investigated. ... 

Table 1.2 The Butadiene tc-system, with AN=N =4, frontier energetic quantities, ionization potential IP), electron affinity EA), electronegativity (x), and chemical hardness (rj) of Eqs. 1.7 and 1.8 - in electron volts (eV), and the resulted parabolic energy of Eq. 1.98, alongside with the 7t-related energy based on the Hiickel simplified (with Coulomb integrals set to zero, a = 0) expression of (1.97) for the experimental/Hiickel method and on the related energy form of Eq. 1.101 and the other semi-empirical methods CNDO, INDO, MINDO, MNDO, AMI, PM3, ZINDO) as described in the previous section - expressed in kilocalories per mol (kcal/mol) their ratio in the last column reflects the value of the actual departure of the electronegativity and chemical hardness parabolic effect from the pi-bonding energy, while for the first (Exp Hiickel) line it expresses the resonance contribution (and a sort of P factor integral) in (1.97) for the tt-bond in this system the eV to kcal/mol conversion follows the rule 1 eV = 23.069 kcal/mol...

---