Earthquakes magnitude

Fig. 2. Regulatory Levels [1 ] and Detection Limits (Lj,). The upper portion of the figure traces a presumed relation between earthquake magnitude [abscissa] and cost to society [ordinate). The "Delaney amendment" viewpoint (not defined for earthquakes) might be interpreted as requiring zero societal risk and a corresponding Ij magnitude of zero, which of course is scientifically unattainable. Rather, an acceptable cost to society for undetected earthquakes, here imagined to be 0.1 M, is used to establish the requisite "regulatory" level. The lower part of the figure...

Fig. 10. Discrimination Limits. Curve F represents the loss to society as a function of earthquake magnitude F represents the cost of avoidance (evacuation, etc.), the dashed portion simulating indirect costs associated with false alarms -- eg, mental anguish, damaged credibility, lawsuits, etc. Points of imbalance between F and F which exceed what is acceptable to society are taken as lower and upper regulatory limits, which must be matched by corresponding lower (L ) and upper (Lq) measurement limits whose difference is the Discrimination Limit (Ap). A non-zero lower limit forces an improved precision requirement in comparison to the "simple" Ln of Fig. 2.

Let V denote the data that include the measured PGA and the corresponding earthquake magnitude, observation station-to-hypocenter distance and site foundation properties. 

Equation (4.36) already showed this for the earthquake magnitude. Other random variables are the degree of filling of the tank and the focal depth. For the sake of the example the following assumptions are made ... 

The reduction factor, y , accounts for the variation of the number of effective stress cycles with the variation of the earthquake magnitude. 

Earthquake magnitudes, Mw, and their approximate epicentral distances to the site of the damage are listed in Table 1.1. 

Fig. 23.12 Effect of earthquake magnitude (m settlement-rotation behavior. PIA peak input...

Figure 1. The map of earthquake epicenters in South Primorye and the adjacent part of the Sea of Japan //<30 km earthquakes with epicenters in the Earth s crust over the period of 1867-2006, which represental seismic hazard for the Primorye (shown in red) H > km earthquakes with epicenters under the Earth s crust over the period of 1990-2006 do not represent real seismic hazard. Over the period up to 1990 a large number of earthquakes with > 30 km were recorded. However, they are not shown in this figure, so that it will be readable. A circle size shows conventionally an earthquake magnitude (MJ.

Let us consider the seismic reliability assessment of a structure and assume that the site seismic hazard is described by the earthquake magnitude M and the source-to-site distance R. The probability of structural failure P(F), that is, the probability of exceeding a threshold response level, can be expressed by the Theorem of Total Probability as ... 

No. Earthquake Magnitude Station No Distance km Site Cond. PGA g PGV cmis PGD cm... 

Trifunac, M. D. Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source-to-station distance, and recording site conditions. Bulletin Seismological Society America, Vol. 66, No. 4,... 

Parameters which are monitored for Ball <3X) circuit trip actuation are earthquake (magnitude 5 or greater on the modified llercalli scale) emergency cooling water flow to reactor failure of neutron flux to decay following a IX safety circuit crip, and reactor-supercritical-a ter a safety rod scram. ... 

It is assumed that safety under seismic impacts will be assured in conformity with practices set forth in the regulatory documents. The strength analysis of the basic project of the VK-300 confirmed the seismic resistance of the plant up to an earthquake magnitude of 7 on the MSK... 

Several sources and projects define the earthquake magnitude in different ways. Day (2002) and Youd et al. (2001) differentiate between the local magnitude (Ml), the surface wave magnitude (Mg) and the moment magnitude (My, ). The latter (M ) is defined as Mg in Eurocode, and best represents the energy associated with the earthquake. However it is concluded that below a value of 7 the magnitude are reasonably close to one another and there is no need to identify which scale is meant in design specifications. 

Table 8.14 Relation between earthquake-magnitude and (epicentral) acceleration (Day 2002).

Design earthquake Peak ground acceleration PGA (bedrock level or fill level), earthquake magnitude M. Alternatively the Contractor can be instructed to perform a site specific seismic study ... 

Coefficient of active earth pressure at rest Horizontal seismic coefficient Vertical seismic coefficient Yield coefficient Earthquake magnitude Constrained Modulus Local magnitude Surface wave magnitude Moment magnitude of earthquake Porosity Initial porosity... 

---