Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

E1 and E2 mechanisms

Outline the basic chemistry of alkyl halides including nucleophilic attack at saturated carbon (substitution and elimination reactions S. 1, S 2, E1 and E2 mechanisms). A brush up with Cram chs 10 and 14, Norman ch 4, Roberts ch 11, Sykes chs 3 and 8, or Tedder vol 1... [Pg.5]

Mechanisms of 8-Elimination Experimental Evidence for E1 and E2 Mechanisms Substitution Versus Elimination... [Pg.373]

There are two types of elimination reactions, E1 and E2 reactions. The mechanism for E1 is a multistep reaction that involves the formation of a carbocation intermediate. The E2 mechanism is a series of steps, bond breaking and bond formation, that occurs simultaneously. Similar to the Sn2 case outlined above, both the haloalkane and the base are involved in the transition state. [Pg.195]

If an elimination product is desired from a tertiary substrate, it is advisable to use a strong base so as to encourage an E2 mechanism over the competing E1 and Sn1 mechanisms. [Pg.282]

For many pairs of reactants, at least two of the mechanisms SnI, Sn2,E1, and E2 are in competition with one another. Each of the following pairs is an exception to this trend in that it goes almost exclusively by one of these four reaction mechanisms. For each reaction... [Pg.219]

Dehydration of alcohols (Sections 5.9-5.13) Dehydration requires an acid catalyst the order of reactivity of alcohols is tertiary > secondary > primary. Elimination is regioselective and proceeds in the direction that produces the most highly substituted double bond. When stereoisomeric alkenes are possible, the more stable one is formed in greater amounts. An E1 (elimination unimolecular) mechanism via a carbo-cation intermediate is followed with secondary and tertiary alcohols. Primary alcohols react by an E2 (elimination bimolecular) mechanism. Sometimes elimination is accompanied by rearrangement. [Pg.229]

As shown in Sects. 3.4.1 and 4.5.1, the first-order catalytic mechanism is much simpler to study than the first CE and EC mechanisms. Thus, when any sequence of potential pulses E1,E2,..., Ep is applied and diffusion coefficients of species B and C in reaction scheme (6.IV) are assumed equal, it is fulfilled that... [Pg.391]

Elimination reactions often compete with substitution. They involve elimination of the halogen and a hydrogen from adjacent carbons to form an alkene. Like substitution, they occur by two main mechanisms. The E2 mechanism is a one-step process. The nucleophile acts as a base to remove the adjacent proton. The preferred form of the transition state is planar, with the hydrogen and the leaving group in an anti conformation. The E1 mechanism has the same first step as the SN1 mechanism. The resulting carbocation then loses a proton from a carbon atom adjacent to the positive carbon to form the alkene. [Pg.109]

Use of Model Alcohols in Mechanistic Studies. - Much use has been made of model alcohols of various types in order to elucidate the detailed mechanism of dehydration, and in so doing, most catalysts have been compared with either alumina or thoria representing respectively E1/E2 and ElcB mechanisms. [Pg.155]

The E2 mechanism is a concerted one-step process in which a nucleophile abstracts a hydrogen ion from one carbon while the halide is leaving from an adjacent one. The Ei mechanism is two-steps and involves a carbocation intermediate formed upon departure of the halide ion in the first step. E2 reactions are bimolecular and the reaction rate depends on the concentrations of both the alkyl halide and nucleophile. E1 reaction rates depend on the slowest step, formation of the carbocation, and are influenced only by the concentration of the alkyl halide the reaction is unimolecular. E2 reactions involve anti elimination and produce a specific alkene, either cis or trans. E1 reactions involve an intermediate carbocation and thus give products of both syn and anti elimination. [Pg.187]

Remember that reactions in which arenediazonium ions are involved must be carried out at 0 °C because they are unstable at higher temperatures. Alkanediazonium ions are even less stable. They lose molecular N2—even at 0 °C—as they are formed, reacting with whatever nucleophiles are present in the reaction mixture by both Sn1/E1 and Sn2/E2 mechanisms. Because of the mixture of products obtained, alkanediazonium ions are of limited synthetic use. [Pg.652]

Fig. 7.1 Chemical reaction mechanism representing a biochemical NAND gate. At steady state, the concentration of species 85 is low if and only if the concentrations of both species Ii and I2 are high. All species with asterisks are held constant by buffering. Thus, the system is formally open although there are two conservation constraints. The first constraint conserves the total concentration of S3 -F 84 -F 85, and the second conserves -F 87. All enzyme-catalyzed reactions in this model are governed by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Lines ending in over an enzymatic reaction step indicate that the corresponding enzyme is inhibited (noncom-petitively) by the relevant chemical species. We have set the dissociation constants, Kp j, of each of the enzymes Ei-Eg, from their respective substrates equal to 5 concentration units. The inhibition constants, K i and K 2, for the noncompetitive inhibition of E1 and 7 by 11 and I2, respectively, are both equal to 1 unit. The Vmax for both Ej and E2 is set to 5 units, and that for E3 and E4 is 1 unit/s. The Vmax s for E5 and Eg are 10 and 1 units/s, respectively. (From [1].)... Fig. 7.1 Chemical reaction mechanism representing a biochemical NAND gate. At steady state, the concentration of species 85 is low if and only if the concentrations of both species Ii and I2 are high. All species with asterisks are held constant by buffering. Thus, the system is formally open although there are two conservation constraints. The first constraint conserves the total concentration of S3 -F 84 -F 85, and the second conserves -F 87. All enzyme-catalyzed reactions in this model are governed by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Lines ending in over an enzymatic reaction step indicate that the corresponding enzyme is inhibited (noncom-petitively) by the relevant chemical species. We have set the dissociation constants, Kp j, of each of the enzymes Ei-Eg, from their respective substrates equal to 5 concentration units. The inhibition constants, K i and K 2, for the noncompetitive inhibition of E1 and 7 by 11 and I2, respectively, are both equal to 1 unit. The Vmax for both Ej and E2 is set to 5 units, and that for E3 and E4 is 1 unit/s. The Vmax s for E5 and Eg are 10 and 1 units/s, respectively. (From [1].)...
In the optical activity arising from higher-order cross-terms, the effects are in most cases expected to be orientation-dependent. Pseudoscalar terms are the only ones which survive in random orientation (molecules in solution or liquid phase). At the same order of perturbation as El-Ml there is a product of the electric dipole and electric quadrupole transition operators (E1-E2). Since the latter product involves tensors of unequal rank, the result cannot be a pseudoscalar and this term would not, therefore, contribute in random orientation but can be significant for oriented systems with quadrupole-allowed transitions. The E1-E2 mechanism was developed by Buckingham and Dunn and recognized by Barron" as a potential contribution to the visible CD in oriented crystals containing the [Co(en)3] " ion. [Pg.67]

In all XNCD measured so far, it has been found that the predominant contribution to X-ray optical activity is from the E1-E2 mechanism. The reason for this is that the El-Ml contribution depends on the possibility of a significant magnetic dipole transition probability and this is strongly forbidden in core excitations due to the radial orthogonality of core with valence and continuum states. This orthogonality is partially removed due to relaxation of the core-hole excited state, but this is not very effective and in the cases studied so far there is no definite evidence of pseudoscalar XNCD. [Pg.77]

Write the products of the following elimination reactions. Specify the predominant mechanism (E1 or E2) and formulate it in detail. [Pg.274]


See other pages where E1 and E2 mechanisms is mentioned: [Pg.213]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.75]   


SEARCH



E2 mechanism

Experimental Evidence for E1 and E2 Mechanisms

© 2024 chempedia.info