Duphos

It was assumed that pyridine derivative 181 yielded pyrido[l,2-c]pyrimidine betaine 182 under catalytic hydrogenation conditions over (5,S)-Et-DuPHoS-Ph catalyst (99TL1211). 6,7-Dehydro derivative 184 of trequinsin (3) was obtained from pyrimidinone 183 by heating in an 1 1 mixture of MeOH and cone. HCl under reflux (97IJC(B)349). 

The numerous chiral phosphine ligands which are available to date [21] can be subclassified into three major categories depending on the location of the chiral center ligands presenting axial chirality (e.g., BINAP 1 and MOP 2), those bearing a chiral carbon-backbone (e.g., DIOP 3, DuPHOS 4), and those bearing the chiral center at the phosphorus atom (e. g., DIPAMP 5, BisP 6), as depicted in Fig. 1. 

Significant advance in the field of asymmetric catalysis was also achieved with the preparation of l,2-bis(phospholano)benzene (DuPHOS 4) and its confor-mationally flexible derivative (l,2-bis(phospholano)ethane, known as BPE) by Burk et al. [59]. Two main distinctive features embodied by these Hgands, as compared to other known chiral diphosphine ligands, are the electron-rich character of the phosphorus atoms on the one hand and the pseudo-chirality at phosphorus atoms, on the other. These properties are responsible for both the high activity of the corresponding metal complex and an enantioselection indepen-... 

An iron complex-catalyzed asymmetric hydrosilylation of ketones was achieved by using chiral phosphoms ligands [68]. Among various ligands, the best enantios-electivities (up to 99% ee) were obtained using a combination of Fe(OAc)2/(5,5)-Me-Duphos in THF. This hydrosilylation works smoothly in other solvents (diethylether, n-hexane, dichloromethane, and toluene), but other iron sources are not effective. Surprisingly, this Fe catalyst (45% ee) was more efficient in the asymmetric hydrosilylation of cyclohexylmethylketone, a substrate that proved to be problematic in hydrosilylations using Ru [69] or Ti [70] catalysts (43 and 23% ee, respectively). 

Dupont s DuPhOS catalyst A.symmetric hydrogenation for making S-metolachlor Blaser and Spindler... 

Eastman Chem. Co. has utilized a Ru(I) (R,R)-dimethyl-DuPhOS catalyst, based on singleisomer 2,5-dialkylphospholane ligands, to hydrogenate an enol ester such as 4-phenyl-1,3-butadien-2-yl acetate, to give 4-phenyl-3-buten-(2R)-yl acetate in 94% ee (Stinson, 1999). 

Recently, the chiral Pt(0) precatalyst Pt[(R, R)-Me-Duphos](trows-stilbene) (11) has been used to prepare enantiomerically enriched chiral phosphines via hydrophosphination of acrylonitrile, t-butyl acrylate and related substrates. This chemistry is summarized in Scheme 5-13. 

Scheme 5-13 Platinum(Me-Duphos)-catalyzed asymmetric hydrophosphination...

Scheme 5-14 Stoichiometric reactions of Pt(Me-Duphos) complexes relevant to the proposed catalytic cycle for asymmetric hydrophosphination...

The reaction rate appears to be limited by the P-H oxidative addition because of tight binding of the olefin in the complexes Pt(Me-Duphos)(olefin). Increasing the reaction temperature to speed up this step, however, reduced the enantiomeric excess [13]. 

Scheme 8.9 Hydrogenations of olefins with UlluPHOS and Me-DuPHOS.

In 2006, Berens et al. reported the synthesis of novel benzothiophene-based DuPHOS analogues, which gave excellent levels of enantioselectivity when applied as the ligands to the asymmetric rhodium-catalysed hydrogenation of various olefins, such as dehydroamino acid derivatives, enamides and itaco-nates (Scheme 8.10). ... 

Scheme 8.10 Hydrogenations of olefins with benzothiophene-based DuPHOS analogue ligands.

More recently, these authors have reported the synthesis of a new thiophene-based analogue of (I ,i )-Me-DuPHOS called UlluPHOS. The facial recognition and enantioselection associated with ruthenium complexes of UlluPHOS and Me-DuPHOS were shown to be similarly high in various hydrogenations of p-keto esters (Scheme 8.32). The most important difference between these two ligands was found by comparing the reaction rates. Indeed, the authors have observed that the use of UlluPHOS considerably increased the activity of the complexes. 

The pharmaceutical industry has been giving increased attention to homogeneous asymmetric hydrogenation for the synthesis of chiral molecules due to significant improvements in this technology (1). We recendy synthesized a chiral a-amino acid intermediate using Et-DuPhos-Rh catalyst, obtaining enantiomeric pmities (EP) of... 

Based upon the above-mentioned assumptions, the reaction scheme in Figure 3.1 is reduced to the scheme shown in Figure 3.2A. It should be noted that active catalyst is used in the reaction scheme in Figure 3.1 while most asymmetric hydrogenation processes use a pre-catalyst (11). Hence, the relationship between the precatalyst and active catalyst needs to be established for the kinetic model. The precatalyst used in this study is [Et-Rh(DuPhos)(COD)]BF4 where COD is cyclooctadiene. The active catalyst (Xq) in Figure 3.2A is formed by removal of COD via hydrogenation, which is irreversible. We assume that the precatalyst is completely converted to the active catalyst Xq before the start of catalytic reaction. Hence, the kinetic model derived here does not include the formation of the active catalyst from precatalyst. 

The eonversion as a function of time for Et-DuPhos-Rh eatalyst determined in a Buehi reaetor is presented in Figure 3.3. It takes more than 700 minutes to get eomplete eonversion. It should be noted that the relationship between the reaction conversion and time is not linear exeept at the beginning of the reaetion as shown in this figure. 

It should be noted that the reaetion using Et-DuPhos-Rh catalyst is not limited by hydrogen mass transfer sinee the hydrogen mass transfer rate is at least 5 times as fast as the initial reaction rate. Furthermore, the overall reaction time, 700 minutes, remained the same regardless of the size of the reactor. 

Figure 3.3 Conversion of SM vs. Reaction Figure 3.4 Comparison between Time Using Et-DuPhos-Rh Experimental Data and...

Catalyst Decay. Asymmetric hydrogenation of the SM using the Et-DuPhos-Rh catalyst exhibits a catalyst threshold behavior. When the initial charge of the catalyst is below this threshold value, the reaction is not completed. This indicates that the catalyst may become deactivated. 

The results from the kinetic study using Et-DuPhos-Rh catalyst lead to the following snggestions for reactivity improvement ... 

Figure 3.8 Impact of MSA Addition on Figure 3.9 Reactivity of Et-FerroTane-Rh Induction Time and Reactivity. Catalyst vs. Et-DuPhos-Rh Catalyst.

Table 3.n Criteria for Commercially Viable Process Et-DuPhos-Rh Catalyst... 

Search for More Active Catalyst. An extensive screening effort was undertaken to find a catalyst more active than Et-DuPhos-Rh. As a result of this effort, Et-FerroTane-Rh and some other competitive catalysts were found. The reactivity of Et-FerroTane-Rh and Et-DuPhos-Rh, is presented in Figure 3.9. The reaction rate with Et-FerroTane-Rh catalyst is very high with a small induction period, and the total time for reaction completion is drastically less than with Et-DuPhos-Rh. 

Manufacture of rhodium precatalysts for asymmetric hydrogenation. Established literature methods used to make the Rh-DuPhos complexes consisted of converting (1,5-cyclooctadiene) acetylacetonato Rh(l) into the sparingly soluble bis(l,5-cyclooctadiene) Rh(l) tetrafluoroborate complex which then reacts with the diphosphine ligand to provide the precatalyst complex in solution. Addition of an anti-solvent results in precipitation of the desired product. Although this method worked well with a variety of diphosphines, yields were modest and more importantly the product form was variable. The different physical forms performed equally as well in hydrogenation reactions but had different shelf-life and air stability. 

---