Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Donor relative strengths

Hydrogen bonds 12-30 0.3 Relative strength is proportional to the polarity of the H bond donor and H bond acceptor. More polar atoms form stronger H bonds. [Pg.15]

The relative strengths of conjugative and hyperconjugative interactions are sharply altered, and general delocalization phenomena become much more pronounced near transition metals, where the abundance of low-lying unfilled valence orbitals provides many new pathways for donor-acceptor stabilization. [Pg.574]

On the basis of relative electronegativities (Section 3.2.5), the order of donor (nA) strengths of group 5-7 AH hydrides is expected to be... [Pg.607]

In conclusion, the C/E ratios for donors (acids) indicate whether hardness or softness is most important in interactions of a particular donor (acid), but softness or hardness so defined does not enable one to predict even the relative strength of interaction towards a soft or hard acid (base) because the magnitude of the C and E numbers are lost when the ratio is taken. [Pg.120]

Arynes are formed when haloarenes are treated with a strong base. Deprotonation at the ortho position of the halogen atom is favored because of polarity alternation, and the facility ofbenzyhe formation from halobenzene (PhF > PhCl > PhBr p Phi) also corresponds with the relative strength of the donor. [Pg.97]

It can be seen from the above discussion that the varying structural modes present in Figure 14 are readily available. For the partially encapsulated complexes there is not only a dependence upon the cation cavity best fit but also on the relative strengths of the competing counter donors, both anions and/or solvent molecules. This is shown in the structures of (79)NaI H20, where the water is held by the metal rather than the I-,402 and (72)NaBr-H20, where the sodium is either symmetrically coordinated with two H20 in axial positions, or non-symmetrically coordinated and lying out of the ligand plane towards the Br not the H20 (Figure 19).421... [Pg.41]

A large number of molecules can react in this way and typically HX contains an H—S or H—O bond or else is a hydrohalic acid. There are both kinetic and thermodynamic considerations as to whether this type of reaction can take place. Firstly, the mechanism of the reaction rarely involves direct protonation of the M—OR bond. Instead, initial coordination of HX through lone pairs of electrons on X is necessary prior to transfer of die proton. Hence, the rate of the reaction will be dependent on the steric constraints of both HX and the metal coordination sphere as well as the electronic donor-acceptor properties of the two substrates. Thermodynamically the position of the equilibrium will depend on a number of variables, the relative strengths of the M—O and M—X bonds being important ones. [Pg.352]

This can be construed as the competition between the bases HX and Y" for protons. It should be apparent that the more powerful HY is as a proton donor, the weaker will be Y as a proton acceptor. In other words, a strong acid will have a weak conjugate base and vice versa. It is often more convenient to rationalise the relative strengths of acids in terms of the proton affinities of their conjugate bases. We look first at acids in aqueous solution, and then at acid/base and other equilibria in non-aqueous polar solvents. [Pg.329]

The relative donor-acceptor strength of various ligands in Lig2Ni(CO)2 complexes has been studied by Meriwether and Fiene (55) using IR techniques. In Table IV the CO stretching frequencies are correlated with... [Pg.55]

Going down th motal column, any metal will replace any metal below it in solution. Relative strength of the metals as reducing agents (electron donors) decreases down the table... [Pg.73]

Thus, the rate of energy transfer depends on the square of the dot product between the acceptor dipole (transition dipole) Pa and the field Eo of the donor dipole (transition dipole), po (Eq. 11 and Fig. 3b). For any chosen locations and orientations of the donor and acceptor, the value of involves the cosine of the angle between the unit vectors Po and Pa (i.e., po Pa) as well as the cosine of the angles between f and Pa (i.e., r Pa) and between f and Po (i.e., f -Pd)- Therefore, for any constant selected angle between the donor and acceptor dipoles (that is, constant Po Pa), the value of will depend on the position in space where the acceptor dipole is relative to the donor. The strength of the field of the donor molecule for any particular constant values of Qo, 0a and Po Pa changes with the distance r as 1/r, that is, for any particular direction of r relative to po As illustrated in Fig. 3a, for a particular angle between the orientations of the donor and acceptor dipoles (Po Pa),... [Pg.517]


See other pages where Donor relative strengths is mentioned: [Pg.99]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.112]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.607 ]




SEARCH



Donor-acceptor interaction relative strengths

© 2024 chempedia.info