Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Domain pinning mechanism

The exponent m cannot be regarded as a fitting parameter but depends on the symmetry of the system. In most cases, m = 3/2 [16, 140, 158, 166, 167, 174, 175], but m = 2 for highly symmetric systems, such as aligned Stoner-Wohlfarth particles. In particular, the m = 3/2 law is realized for misaligned Stoner-Wohlfarth particles and for most domain-wall pinning mechanisms [5], Experimental values of m tend to vary between 1.5 to 2 [136, 158]. Linear laws, where m = 1, are sometimes used in simplified models, but so far it hasn t been possible to derive them from physically reasonable energy landscapes [5, 16, 176]. The same is true for dependences such as /H- l/H0 [177], where series expansion yields an m = 1 power law. [Pg.72]

Fig. 15. Coercivity versus maximum applied field at r = 200K for a NdFeB (20nm)/Fe(0.5nm) sample. The result indicates that magnetization reversal in the easy direction is controlled by a domain-wall pinning mechanism. (By courtesy of Dr. D. Sellmyer, Behlen Lal5. of Physics, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NB, USA). Fig. 15. Coercivity versus maximum applied field at r = 200K for a NdFeB (20nm)/Fe(0.5nm) sample. The result indicates that magnetization reversal in the easy direction is controlled by a domain-wall pinning mechanism. (By courtesy of Dr. D. Sellmyer, Behlen Lal5. of Physics, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NB, USA).
The mechanism for coercivity in the Cr—Co—Fe alloys appears to be pinning of domain walls. The magnetic domains extend through particles of both phases. The evidence from transmission electron microscopy studies and measurement of JT, and anisotropy vs T is that the walls are trapped locally by fluctuations in saturation magnetization. [Pg.383]

For ferroelectrics, mainly two possible mechanisms for irreversible processes exist. First, lattice defects which interact with a domain wall and hinder it from returning into its initial position after removing the electric field that initiated the domain wall motion ( pinning ) [16]. Second, the nucleation and growth of new domains which do not disappear after the field is removed again. In ferroelectric materials the matter is further complicated by defect dipoles and free charges that also contribute to the measured polarization and can also interact with domain walls [17]. Reversible contributions in ferroelectrics are due to ionic and electronic... [Pg.32]


See other pages where Domain pinning mechanism is mentioned: [Pg.183]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.1227]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.755]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.168]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.777 ]




SEARCH



Domain mechanism

Domains pinning

Pin, pins

Pinning

Pinning mechanisms

© 2024 chempedia.info