Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Distribution Center Existing Conditions

Rolfgaard [2.2] compares the types of trays and heating systems The ribbed trays are said to have an uneven temperature distribution, because the distances between shelf and tray vary between 0.1 mm and 1 mm. The ribs could compensate this only partially. The variation in distances is correct, but Rolfgaard overlooks that the thermal conductivity in the bottom of the tray is so effective that practically no temperature differences are established in the bottom. Even with an evaporation of 3 kg ice/m2 h and the assumption that all heat is Transmitted only in the center of the tray (8 cm from the border of the tray), the temperature difference between border and center is approx. 5 °C. During the drying under actual conditions, no measurable temperature differences can exist. [Pg.140]

Gas-phase intracomplex substitution in (R)-(- -)-l-arylethanol/CHs OH2 adducts. It is well established that bimolecular Sn2 reactions generally involve predominant inversion of configuration of the reaction center. Unimolecular SnI displacements instead proceed through the intermediacy of free carbocations and, therefore, usually lead to racemates. However, many alleged SnI solvolyses do not give fully racemized products. The enantiomer in excess often, but not always, corresponds to inversion. Furthermore, the stereochemical distribution of products may be highly sensitive to the solvolytic conditions.These observations have led to the concept of competing ° or mixed SNl-SN2 mechanisms. More recently, the existence itself of SnI reactions has been put into question. ... [Pg.263]

A sufficient condition is lim oo i/ — ihy)B(t) = (A)(B (= 0 since A and B are centered).4 In systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom, and thus with oscillating response and correlation functions, this limit does not even exist. Nevertheless, Eqs. (40) and (41) still apply, provided we introduce a small damping which will be eventually let equal to zero, or, which amounts to the same, we treat the response and correlation functions as distributions. [Pg.272]

In Refs. [303-305], the interface structure was also investigated by cross-sectional HRTEM. The diamond films were grown by the three-step process, and the conditions are listed in Table H.3. Consequently, an HOD film was grown in the center of the Si(lOO) substrate. In the carburization step, there was an a-C film of 250-nm thickness on Si, in which p-SiC, diamond, and graphite were embedded. A closer examination indicated that there existed an interlayer of 1.5- to 2-pm thickness between Si and the a-C layer, which was identified as a-SiC [305]. Since the bias voltage is not usually applied uniformly across the Si wafer, the distribution of these materials depended on the location on the Si substrate. Near the edge of the... [Pg.184]

First, we shall use a quasi-stationary approach already mentioned earlier, based on the assumption that characteristic times of heat and mass transfer in the gaseous phase are much shorter than in the liquid phase, since the coefficients of diffusion and thermal conductivity are much greater in the gas than in the liquid. Therefore the distribution of parameters in the gas may be considered as stationary, while they are non-stationary in the liquid. On the other hand, small volume of the drop allows us to assume that the temperature and concentration distributions are constant within the drop, while in the gas they depend on coordinates. Another assumption is that the drop s center does not move relative to the gas. Actually, this assumption is too strong, because in real processes, for example, when a liquid is sprayed in a combustion chamber, drops move relative to the gas due to inertia and the gravity force. However, if the size of drops is small (less than 1 pm) and the processes of heat and mass exchange are fast enough, then this assumption is permissible. As usual, we assume the existence of local thermodynamic equilibrium at the drop s surface, as well as equal pressures in both phases. The last condition was formulated at the end of Section 6.7. [Pg.151]


See other pages where Distribution Center Existing Conditions is mentioned: [Pg.344]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.429]   


SEARCH



Conditional distribution

Distributed distribution centers

Distribution centers

Distributive condition

© 2024 chempedia.info