Distillation column design limitations

No one steel exceeds the tensile modulus of mild steel. Therefore, in applications in which rigidity is a limiting factor for design (e.g., for storage tanks and distillation columns), high-strength steels have no advantage over mild steel. Stress concentrations in mild steel structures are relieved by plastic flow and are not as critical in other, less-ductile steels. 

A condenser is required to condense n-propanol vapour leaving the top of a distillation column. The n-propanol is essentially pure, and is a saturated vapour at a pressure of 2.1 bara. The condensate needs to be sub-cooled to 45°C. Design a horizontal shell and tube condenser capable of handling a vapour rate of 30,000 kg/h. Cooling water is available at 30°C and the temperature rise is to be limited to 30° C. The pressure drop on the vapour stream is to be less than 50 kN/m2, and on the water stream less than 70 kN/m2. The preferred tube size is 16 mm inside diameter, 19 mm outside diameter, and 2.5 m long. 

All such processes suffer one disadvantage in that the capacity of the adsorbent for the adsorbate in question is limited. The adsorbent has to be removed at intervals from the process and regenerated, that is, restored to its original condition. For this reason, the adsorption unit was considered in early industrial applications to be more difficult to integrate with a continuous process than, say, a distillation column. Furthermore, it was difficult to manufacture adsorbents which had identical adsorptive properties from batch to batch. The design of a commercial adsorber and its operation had to be sufficiently flexible to cope with such variations. 

Figure 1.3. Notation of flow quantities in a reactor (1) and distillation column (2). A 1 designates the amount of component A in stream k proceeding from unit i to unit j. Subscripts 0 designates a source or sink beyond the boundary limits. F designates a total flow quantity.

While the limiting phenomenon of upper limit flooding in a vertical pipe is similar to ultimate capacity in distillation, there is a distinct difference. Upper limit in a vertical pipe applies to a design where a conscious effort should be made to minimize gas-liquid contact. Carried to extremes, it would involve separate tubes for liquid flowing down and vapor going up. In contrast, ultimate capacity in a distillation column corresponds to the condition where effective mass transfer disappears due to high entrainment. One could force more vapor up through the contactor, but fractionation would be poor. 

One of the challenging aspects of distillation column control is the many limitations imposed on the operation of the column. There are hydraulic constraints, separation constraints, heat-transfer constraints, pressure constraints, and temperature constraints. We recommend the excellent books by Kister (1992 and 1990) on distillation design and operation. 

Reactive distillation, as the name implies, refers to a distillation process that incorporates a reaction and a separation step within a distillation column. The technique offers a key opportunity for improving the structure of a process. - It is a so-called hybrid process, i.e. it merges two different unit operations in a single apparatus, namely reaction and distillation. But the combination of distillation and reactions is possible only if the conditions of both unit operations can be combined. This means that the reactions have to show reasonable data for conversions at pressure and temperature levels that are compatible with distillation conditions. Because of the limited hold-up in distillation column, those reactions having a conversion half-time of 10-30 min are preferred. So, the judicious use of the chemical equilibrium constant is the basis for the design of reactive distillation processes. 

In fact, through use of matrix models of mass transfer in multicomponent systems (as opposed to effective diffusivity methods) it is possible to develop methods for estimating point and tray efficiencies in multicomponent systems that, when combined with an equilibrium stage model, overcome some of the limitations of conventional design methods. The purpose of this chapter is to develop these methods. We look briefly at ways of solving the set of equations that model an entire distillation column and close with a review of experimental and simulation studies that have been carried out with a view to testing multicomponent efficiency models. 

---