Discriminatory classifiers

MR spectra from 33 patients with breast cancer with vascular invasion and 52 without were subjected to the SCS-based analysis. Maximally discriminatory subregions were 0.47-0.55, 0.57-0.62, 0.86-0.92, 1.00-1.03, 1.69-1.71, 1.99-2.05, 2.55-2.56 and 2.63-2.72 ppm for the first derivatives of the spectra, and 0.75-0.81, 0.90-0.94, 1.03-1.12, 1.21-1.24, 1.59-1.63, 2.00-2.04, 2.24-2.27 and 2.70-2.74 ppm for rank-ordered spectra. Using LDA and bootstrap-based cross-validation, two separate classifiers, A (using the optimal regions from the first derivatives of the spectra) and B (using the optimal regions from the rank-ordered spectra), were developed. The final classifier was the Wolpert-combined A + B classifiers.61... 

Discriminant analysis techniques (also called classification techniques) are concerned with classifying objects into one of two or more classes. Discriminant techniques are considered to be learning procedures. Given, a set of objects whose class identity is known, a model learns from the variables which have been measured for each of the objects, a procedure which can be used to assign a new object, whose class identity is unknown, into one of the predefined classes. Such a procedure is performed using a well-defined discriminatory rule. 

If the discriminant score, C, exceeds a certain threshold value (discriminatory value or cutoff value), the credit quality of a corporation will be classified as good, otherwise as poor. The estimation of the discriminant function requires a set of corporations that are already classified as solvent or insolvent (good or poor). Thus it is possible to assess the reliability of the function via the number of misclassified corporations. 

---