Directed relation graph method

The original DRG method of Lu and Law (2005) defines the connection weight from species i to species j in the following way  

A variant of the DGR method was suggested by Luo et al. (2010a) for the reduction of reaction mechanisms containing many isomers. Luo et al. recommended the application of the maximum norm instead of the 

Here S is the full set of chemical species and Rj i is a coimection weight defined in Eqs. 7.7 and 7.8, and it is implicitly assumed that if two species are not connected, then Rj i = 0. This approach defines the importance coefficient for species i as the smallest connection on any path towards a target species, is calculated 

The DRG method was first applied to a model system of ethylene combustion (Lu and Law 2005 Luo et al. 2011) with a full scheme of 70 species. A value of e of 0.16 gave a skeleton scheme of 33 species, i.e. quite a substantial degree of reduction. In application to n-heptane and iso-octane combustion using full schemes of 561 and 857 species (Lu and Law 2006c), e values of 0.19 and 0.17 resulted in reduced schemes of 188 and 233 species, respectively. DRG methods have since been widely applied for the reduction of large combustion schemes including for methane (Sankaran et al. 2007), primary reference fuel (Lu and Law 

---

In the following, reaction flow analysis, sensitivity analysis and the directed relation graph method will be presented as static and dynamic reduction procedures. Thereafter will the main features of ILDM (including extensions such as flamelet generated manifolds (FGM) and reaction-diffusion manifolds (REDIM)), CSP and the LOI be discussed, including the fundamentals of the quasi steady state elimination procedure and the rate-controlled constrained equilibria (RCCE) approach. 

The step wise reduction procedure described above can been automated by the use of the Directed Relation Graph method (Lu and Law, 2005) (Lu and Law, 2006). This procedure quantifies the coupling between species, and assigns an "pair wise" error which contains the information of how much error is introduced to a species A by elimination of a species B ... 

Lu, T., Law, C.K. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proc. Combust Inst 30, 1333-1341 (2005)... 

Tosatto, L., Bennett, B.A.V., Smooke, M.D. A transport-flux-based directed relation graph method for the spatially inhomogeneous instantaneous reduction of chemical kinetic mechanisms. Combust. Flame 158, 820-835 (2011)... 

An, J., Jiang, Y. Differences between direct relation graph and error-propagation-based reduction methods for large hydrocarbons. Procedia Eng. 62, 342-349 (2013)... 

There are several properties of a chemical that are related to exposure potential or overall reactivity for which structure-based predictive models are available. The relevant properties discussed here are bioaccumulation, oral, dermal, and inhalation bioavailability and reactivity. These prediction methods are based on a combination of in vitro assays and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) [3]. QSARs are simple, usually linear, mathematical models that use chemical structure descriptors to predict first-order physicochemical properties, such as water solubility. Other, similar models can then be constructed that use the first-order physicochemical properties to predict more complex properties, including those of interest here. Chemical descriptors are properties that can be calculated directly from a chemical structure graph and can include abstract quantities, such as connectivity indices, or more intuitive properties, such as dipole moment or total surface area. QSAR models are parameterized using training data from sets of chemicals for which both structure and chemical properties are known, and are validated against other (independent) sets of chemicals. 

When the analytical instrument used is not able to directly produce signals for the analyte but only for a substance able to react with the analyte, calibration by the indirect method is used. The reagent is added in a constant and known amoimt to both sample and standard solutions. If it is added in excess in relation to the highest analyte concentration, the amoimt remaining after reaction decreases in successive standard solutions. The calibration graph produced is presented in Fig. 3.7. 

In the aluminate route to LDH, aluminum salt (113,114), aluminum hydroxide (115,116), or aluminate (117-119) is initially treated with the required amount of base (e.g., six hydroxides for each aluminum if the product is to be of type M(II)2A1(0H)6X), followed by addition of M(II), either in a salt or a carbonate form (113-115,117,119) or in the form of an oxide or hydroxide (116,118,120,121). The pH graph observed for this titration shows endpoints related to the formation of Al(OH)3, aluminate, and LDH. This method of formation yields LDH directly from solution, with no intervening solid phase. The product has an increased degree of order in the metal hydroxide layer and slightly smaller surface area when compared to LDH prepared by other methods, as shown by infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy, and MAS Al and MAS Cl NMR (113,114,122). 

---