Dipole longitudinal

Figure C2.2.5. Fmstrated smectic phases. Here tire arrows denote longitudinal molecular dipoles.

Kurogoshi and Hori [ 104] determined the crystal structures of the mesogenic ethyl and butyl 4-[4-(4-n-octyloxybenzoyloxy)benzylidene]aminobenzoates. The compounds have different phase sequences crystal-smectic A-nematic-isotropic and crystal-smectic C-smectic A-nematic-isotropic for the ethyl and butyl compounds, respectively. Both compounds have layer structures in the solid phase. The butyl compound contains two crystallographically independent molecules. Within the layers, adjacent molecules are arranged alternately so as to cancel their longitudinal dipole moments with each other. In the ethyl compound the core moieties are almost perpendicular to the layer plane, while in the butyl compound these moieties are tilted in the layer. 

Many of the mesogenic molecules are stericaUy asymmetric, which is determined by the fractures and bending of the molecular core as well as by the presence of the tail chains of different nature, including the branched, biforked or polyphilic moieties (Fig. 2c-f). In terms of the multipole model of molecular asymmetry introduced by Petrov and Derzhanski [34], we can speak about longitudinal or transverse steric dipoles or multipoles (Fig. 3). 

Nuclear spins can be considered as dipoles that interact with each other via dipolar couplings. While this interaction leads to strongly broadened lines in soUd-state NMR spectroscopy, it is averaged out in isotropic solution due to the fast tumbUng of the solute molecules. In Uquid-state NMR spectroscopy, the dipolar interaction can only be observed indirectly by relaxation processes, where they represent the main source of longitudinal and transverse relaxation. 

When l l, the above gives the so-called cross-correlation functions and the associated cross-correlation rates (longitudinal and transverse). Crosscorrelation functions arise from the interference between two relaxation mechanisms (e.g., between the dipole-dipole and the chemical shielding anisotropy interactions, or between the anisotropies of chemical shieldings of two nuclei, etc.).40 When l = 1=2, one has the autocorrelation functions G2m(r) or simply... 

A new NMR method for the determination of the anomeric configuration in mono- and disaccharides has been described.18 The protocol is based on the different cross-correlated relaxation between proton chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) and dipolar relaxation for the a and (3 anomers of sugars. Only the ot-anomers show the presence of CSA (HI or Hl )-proton dipole (H1-H2 or Hl -H2 ) in the longitudinal relaxation of the anomeric protons. The method is of special interest for cases in which vicinal coupling constants between HI and H2 in both anomers a and (3 are similar and small, such as D-mannose, and the non-ambiguous description of the anomeric configuration needs additional measurements. 

Without the external field, the Stockmayer fluid near the wall exhibits symmetric density oscillations that die out as they reach the middle of the film. Near the surface, the fluid dipoles are oriented parallel to the walls. Upon turning on the electric field, the density profile of the Stockmayer fluid exhibits pronounced oscillations throughout the film. The amplitude of these oscillations increases with increasing field strength until a saturation point is reached at which all the fluid dipoles are oriented parallel to the field (perpendicular to the walls). The density profile remains symmetric. The dipole-dipole correlation function and its transverse [] and longitudinal [] com-... 

These results suggest that the signals arise from dipole-dipole coupled protons. Kreis et al. confirmed this finding by measurements using one-dimensional zero- and double-quantum filtering, two-dimensional J-resolved spectroscopy, two-dimensional constant time COSY and longitudinal order separation... 

Recapitulating, the SBM theory is based on two fundamental assumptions. The first one is that the electron relaxation (which is a motion in the electron spin space) is uncorrelated with molecular reorientation (which is a spatial motion infiuencing the dipole coupling). The second assumption is that the electron spin system is dominated hy the electronic Zeeman interaction. Other interactions lead to relaxation, which can be described in terms of the longitudinal and transverse relaxation times Tie and T g. This point will be elaborated on later. In this sense, one can call the modified Solomon Bloembergen equations a Zeeman-limit theory. The validity of both the above assumptions is questionable in many cases of practical importance. 

---